Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Sudeep Jain

Sudeep Jain has started 6 posts and replied 24 times.

Originally posted by @Chris Mason:
Originally posted by @Sudeep Jain:

Between two properties, one with market rate rents, and another with bmr rents, but both at the same GRM, which one would you prefer? Obviously, with the BMR rents, there is a tremendous potential for appreciation if the existing tenants leave, but as a landlord in Oakland, there is no way I know of, that can make a BMR tenant with several years of tenancy leave.. If I was in their place, I would not leave either!

To flesh out the scenario, one unit is a fourplex with three tenants paying 50% of what market rents are in the area today, and one unit is vacant. The second unit is a duplex that will be delivered vacant and caters to a 'higher end' tenant. The GRMs are the same for both, roughly 12. Both units are expected to have perhaps 20-40K$ worth of deferred maintenance, but the duplex is about 20 years 'younger' than the fourplex. Further, the operating cost of the duplex will be a few thousand dollars less than the fourplex.

So which one would you prefer and why? I would really like to know your thought process behind the preference.  

 Write offers that make sense on both properties. If both offers get accepted, then you will be the envy of everyone else in the Bay Area.

I'd lean towards the one that is vacant, if for some reason there was a space alien holding a laser to my head and ordering me to only write one offer. This way I could screen for tenants less likely to intend to live there for decades, Costa-Hawkins Act for the win.

But, real world answer, write offers on both properties. Worry about this fantasy scenario of "too many people in Oakland want to sell homes to me at price points that I love as the buyer!!!!" if the fantasy actually becomes reality. 

Believe it or not, I am in this situation. I dont have the money to buy both. I take your point taken about vacancy, however, the rents in the occupied building are so low, that if tenants were to vacate, it would immediately appreciate, a lot. That, is the dilemma. 

This is my first 'investment prop' and I am buying at what could be a pricey time. So naturally, I keep rethinking, Is there anything else that I need to consider that I am not? Is a GRM of 12 overpaying for the Fruitvale area of Oakland?

Originally posted by @DG A.:

If you owner occupy a property 3 units or smaller in Oakland, and the rents are below market, that investment will win every time (assuming a few hundred dollars bmr). The reason being, you can adjust the rents to market rate after you (the owner) have lived in the property for 2 years. 

Unfortunately, that option is not available to me. My better half will not move! :-) 

Between two properties, one with market rate rents, and another with bmr rents, but both at the same GRM, which one would you prefer? Obviously, with the BMR rents, there is a tremendous potential for appreciation if the existing tenants leave, but as a landlord in Oakland, there is no way I know of, that can make a BMR tenant with several years of tenancy leave.. If I was in their place, I would not leave either!

To flesh out the scenario, one unit is a fourplex with three tenants paying 50% of what market rents are in the area today, and one unit is vacant. The second unit is a duplex that will be delivered vacant and caters to a 'higher end' tenant. The GRMs are the same for both, roughly 12. Both units are expected to have perhaps 20-40K$ worth of deferred maintenance, but the duplex is about 20 years 'younger' than the fourplex. Further, the operating cost of the duplex will be a few thousand dollars less than the fourplex.

So which one would you prefer and why? I would really like to know your thought process behind the preference.  

Post: Looking for G.C partners in the Oakland area

Sudeep JainPosted
  • Fremont, CA
  • Posts 24
  • Votes 9

I am looking for a project partner who can handle redoing electrical, plumbing and windows. I need a general contractor because my day job wont allow me to coordinate different activities on a construction site. Needs to be licensed and insured or make use of someone elses license. 

In my experience of doing a renovation on my primary residence, high-mid end finishes etc. dont really matter towards the final cost of the project, the biggest variable is the labor cost, so you might as well pay for top end finishes and get the most for the top dollar labor. :-) 

Post: Looking for G.C partners in the Oakland area

Sudeep JainPosted
  • Fremont, CA
  • Posts 24
  • Votes 9

Yeah.. I heard that. How about out of area G.Cs? :-) Doesnt help that Sacramento is booming too. 

Post: Looking for G.C partners in the Oakland area

Sudeep JainPosted
  • Fremont, CA
  • Posts 24
  • Votes 9

I have submitted bids on some fixers in the Oakland area, so far I haven't been able to get a rental unit I really liked but I am hopeful. After the fact, I realized that I actually had no clarity on getting the right contractors in a reasonable time frame (2-3 months). If I cant fix the property fast, that just adds to the cash hemorrhage :-) 

I have heard off and on that most good contractors in Oakland area really really busy and booked for years, if not months out. I would like to get to know some contractors on the forum so I have a better handle on this aspect. My goals are the acquire a fixer and rent it out in the shortest time possible. Hoping I can get some references and contacts. 

Post: Single Family with low GRM in West Oakland?

Sudeep JainPosted
  • Fremont, CA
  • Posts 24
  • Votes 9

Thanks Sergey! I visited a few Oakland open houses this weekend and for sure, the deals are out there.. Especially if one can do some OMI evictions and get to market rents. Unfortunately, that phase of my life when I could take such a task on is gone but I am sure enterprising young bp members can make it happen. Hundreds of thousands of dollars on the table if you can.. For a couple of years worth of disruption in your life. :-) 

One interesting thing I saw in Oakland was unpermitted duplex conversions of old Victorians. Basically, an unpermitted apartment has been created under the permitted space, within the footprint of the old house. Unpermitted is unpermitted, and a huge liability if one were to rent it, but a few of the places looked like they were up to code.. Is it possible to get a permit for such a unit after the fact? I supposed inspectors would want to peek behind the walls etc. Just how difficult is such a thing? Is it as simple as taking down the sheetrock at a few places for the inspection, fixing up any issues and putting it back up again? Or more difficult than that? Any interesting stories to share? :-)

I went to a few open houses in Oakland for duplex units this weekend but it turned out that a couple of them were unpermitted basement units. The work appeared professional enough and looked upto code, but unpermitted is unpermitted and a liability. Has anyone gone through the process of getting a permit for unpermitted work?  How difficult is it? 

Post: Single Family with low GRM in West Oakland?

Sudeep JainPosted
  • Fremont, CA
  • Posts 24
  • Votes 9

Hi Ray, Thanks for all the great tips! I am continuing to research more about the area, check out open houses etc. and was surprised to find out that a few murders happened recently, a couple of blocks from a house I was really interested in. Perhaps this is just.. Oakland.. and not a cause for concern? 

apropos investment choices, here is my take on it. The stock market is at a CAPE of nearly 30, and all of Martin's charts apply to that as well. Staying in cash is also a choice..  Going out of bay area is also a choice, but then those areas tend to be hit more than the Bay area by macro events/recessions etc. So far I have looked at Stockton and Sacramento, which to my naive eyes appeared as expensive/cheap as the bay area. 

This being my first investment,  and I dont have any connections with contractors, I did not want to overextend myself and go for fixers. 

Post: Single Family with low GRM in West Oakland?

Sudeep JainPosted
  • Fremont, CA
  • Posts 24
  • Votes 9

Thank you very much Ray! I think you guys might have saved me from a bad deal! :-)