Originally posted by @EJ K.:
@Ryan Heywood
Gotcha. Thank you. That was my interpretation. There was no infrastructure for a day care. One bathroom. She added multiple bathrooms fit for little people. There was no kitchen so she took back all that was hers. The painting was probably the only overboard part. The jungle gym was hers and looks like it did prior to her renting now. Security wasn’t there before and isn’t now. Cabinets and wall mounts/shelves aren’t there as they were before. Water fountain isn’t there as it was before. It was a dump, we left it better than it was.
this was probably the wrong forum to post on but I wanted opposition views and I sure got them. I don’t think a lot of the situation is easily translatable. The floor damage was due to her not fixing leaks and it caused the carpet to pull up the floor when I pulled it up. By carpet I mean child rug with car lanes on it. The only permanent things we took, which weren’t there before anyway was water fountains, industrial sink ( was no kitchen before), and painting over a mural which I doubt she knows was there as she’s managing from afar.
The appliances are ours and not permanent. We left the toilets. Figured it’s doubtful another daycare goes in there now anyway.
The jungle gym wasn’t cemented in. Figured that was fair pickings too.
She needed to paint the place anyway. It was run down and never maintained except by renter....
they had to paint immediately upon leasing so it wouldn’t make sense to return something prestine that was garbage before.
Did your MIL have an agency agreement between her company and the landlord allowing her to make improvements to the place?
Did your MIL give written notice to the landlord regarding the repairs she had to make, plus allow the landlord the opportunity to fix any problems, or did she just do them without notifying the landlord?
As others have suggested, refer back to your lease regarding how to handle any improvements.
You need to speak with a lawyer about this before you do anything vindictive. Selling off used toilets comes off as particularly petty and if this goes to litigation a judge might not side with you.