Originally posted by @Tony Kim:
But I think with your knowledge of the local market and with the size of your deals, I believe you when you say you are able to find deeply discounted properties that make the 40%+ irr projections feasible. So although the promote is highly favorable to the sponsor, the LP still benefits because of the huge cushion created by the low acquisition cost. Also, my impression is that you are a developer first and an investment manager second. Whereas most sponsors are investment firms first and don't necessarily do their own construction work. Thereby allowing you to implement your forced rent raises at a much more efficient price and timetable.
I'll DM you for some more info as I've been looking to deploy some capital in an apt syndication. Thanks.
it's simple risk/reward
for both the GP side and the LP side
a lot of LPs might be turned off by the split, yet others are attracted to the potential IRR
and the OP has to make his money off of the deal since he is putting more work into the deal
neither side is forced to do 80/20, 70/30 or 30/70
it depends on the GP and LP and the education/trust that the GP instills