Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Stetson Oates

Stetson Oates has started 1 posts and replied 54 times.

Post: No Submitted Applications

Stetson OatesPosted
  • Posts 54
  • Votes 44

Hello,

I've received a lot of calls and have done many showings on my 2 properties in the same area.  I use Turbo Tenant and have sent the application link to 20 or so people. No one applies.  I've had several "potential" tenants, I've sent the application invitation to, none have filled out the application.  The Turbo Tenant fee is $55 per application.  Is the application fee a problem? If not, are these people just not going to qualify?  Loose qualifications are 3X income, 580 Credit Score, No evictions.....  Oklahoma City is the Location...

Quote from @Alexandra E Hartman:

Ya this has been exactly what I've been mulling on.  With interests rates at insane levels (the market I'm looking at seems to be over 10% for investors), a loan would deeply decrease my cash flow.  Is getting $50-100/month worth the hassle of the extra tenants and repairs?  Is it smarter to buy a house all cash now, with the plan to take a loan out when the market inevitably cools/crashes and interest rates are lowered?  Or maybe getting a loan and then having 3-4 properties vs. 1 is actually best for risk management.  Paying that much interest makes my skin crawl ha...

I've always looked at a property netting $100 per month as not worth anyone's time. At that point you are banking on appreciation 10 years down the road. If I'm going to be liable for $250K for 10 years, it better net me more than $100 per month. The issue is leverage, if used responsibly, it helps expand growth. If used irresponsibly it can crush you. Lots of investors are leveraged to the max. If there happened to be an event in the market that upset the financial lenders, they are toast. All cash or very low LTV leverage, you will sleep better and succeed in the longer run.


Option 2 is what I'm doing now. I plan to pull some cash out once rates go down, but leave the LTV at 25% to 35% on each property.

If you have the cash its best to use it. The more you leverage the more risk you have of failure. I'm using cash right now and IF rates turn lower Ill refi and keep the LTV at 25% to 35%. This gives you some cash back but still plenty of protection in a down market.