I get it why some are more comfortable with a paid off property and that if you're going to be leveraged at all you must have a plan for the times when you won't have rent money coming in, unexpected expenses, and all that, but curious if anyone ever does the math on return on equity for a paid off rental property and then thinks to themselves "Dang I could have just dollar cost averaged into an S&P 500 index fund all these years which has returned about 10% on average over the past 90 years"?
If you think about a paid off property hitting the 1% rule, it is probably returning 6-8% ROE, hitting the 1.5% rule is probably 9-11%. These are rough ranges, some probably do better (and some probably do worse). But is it worth dealing with tenants, repairs, maintenance, evictions, and all of that for an ROE in this range?
Now of course if you're the type of person who's going to panic and sell their mutual fund after a sell-off like we had today, then being invested instead in real estate, even with "dead equity," is probably the best way to go.