Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Stephen Flynt

Stephen Flynt has started 6 posts and replied 40 times.

Post: Should I pay down rental property?

Stephen FlyntPosted
  • Alpharetta, GA
  • Posts 44
  • Votes 23
Originally posted by @James Teutschmann:

@Ola Dantis If rental properties are "the get rich slow game" then using the extra rental income to pay down the principal changes the game to "the get rich in 60 years game". I guess it all depends on your goals with the cash flow as you said. I do like the idea of having more equity in the property to use as a HELOC later.

Keep in mind when it comes to HELOC's, that they can and will be cancelled in a recession. I found that out in 2008! I recommend that rather than paying down a mortgage, to set that money aside, because it will do you more good in your bank account when things get bad than having equity in a house that you can't get out. You also may find in a downturn that the equity you thought you had isn't really as much as you had planned for if the value of the property declines.

Post: 22 year old about to start a new job with 401k match

Stephen FlyntPosted
  • Alpharetta, GA
  • Posts 44
  • Votes 23

Originally posted by @Harrison Tull:

@Mark Pipkin,

I don’t want to hijack the thread with our differing opinions but I would hope people who were retired or on the verge of retiring in 2008 had a portfolio weighted toward bonds. The key is matching up your asset allocation with your goals and the risks and volatility you are willing to withstand. Now, let me say I am only putting in my minimum to get my max and putting everything else into a high interest savings account and looking for good rental investments. My only point is there is rarely one right answer but a guaranteed 50% return is going to be hard to match anywhere else.

I would also hope those retiring in 2008 would not need to cash out their entire retirement account but rather were following something like the 5% withdrawal rule of thumb.  If they were in the position to have to cash out their entire retirement account, that would not even really be retirement would it lol.

I began using Stessa this year and really like it.

Originally posted by @Jay Hinrichs:
Originally posted by @Nathan Gesner:

@Jay Hinrichs  I quit watching the BP podcasts. First, they generally regurgitate the same information so less than 10% is applicable to me. Second, I like David but he's not as entertaining as Josh was.

BP Business Podcast will be right up my alley if they produce the same level of value as the standard podcast does for a new(er) investor.

 cant honestly say I have watched a pod cast of anyones.. I watch a few minutes of MOrris and his wife blaming all their problems on others.. and I listened to about 10 minutes of Mike Quarles podcast.. I liked him.. he is a pro no doubt.

I never listened to mine either.. but I like talking about everything other than what is usually talked about on BP like how to get rich in the timber industry LOL

I would love to listen to a podcast that talked about how to get rich through buying and selling land as well as selling rights for timber, mining, what have you.  Does one exist??? Kinda kidding around in my question but would seriously love to learn more.  Seems like the right land purchase at the right time and right price could net much more for much less effort than doing rentals and flips (which I currently do).

Post: Hold or sell? Bay Area townhome

Stephen FlyntPosted
  • Alpharetta, GA
  • Posts 44
  • Votes 23
Originally posted by @Steve Graves:

1031 exchange it for a multi unit property and start making some money. Dump that place. I've done the negative cash flow before and it's a huge take out of your expenses every month.

Forgive my ignorance but how does a 1031 apply when selling a property at a loss?  

I get it why some are more comfortable with a paid off property and that if you're going to be leveraged at all you must have a plan for the times when you won't have rent money coming in, unexpected expenses, and all that, but curious if anyone ever does the math on return on equity for a paid off rental property and then thinks to themselves "Dang I could have just dollar cost averaged into an S&P 500 index fund all these years which has returned about 10% on average over the past 90 years"?

If you think about a paid off property hitting the 1% rule, it is probably returning 6-8% ROE, hitting the 1.5% rule is probably 9-11%.  These are rough ranges, some probably do better (and some probably do worse).  But is it worth dealing with tenants, repairs, maintenance, evictions, and all of that for an ROE in this range?  

Now of course if you're the type of person who's going to panic and sell their mutual fund after a sell-off like we had today, then being invested instead in real estate, even with "dead equity," is probably the best way to go.

Originally posted by @Robert M.:
Originally posted by @Joe Villeneuve:
Originally posted by @Robert M.:

 Ask any investor who went broke in the 2008 crash. What went wrong?  Oh, and there was a LOT of them, most of which will never recover.  Debt = liability. I personally hate liability and want to pay my self the 5%  mortgage interest over the years, rather than the bank. I can come up with deductions other than mortgage interest. Once the properties are paid off I can owner finance to keep the income stream in my golden years or continue to collect rent without paying the bank first. If I wanted to be a BIG investor my strategy would be different. I just want about 5 paid for properties, that's all I need, the Roths will do the rest. Besides, about 5 paid for rentals is so much less work and stress than say 40 or 50. I guess im a dumb a$$ at math.

 Lost equity in a rental isn't a loss until you sell the property.  If  you don't need to sell the property, you didn't lose anything...yet.  I had rentals in 2008.  They dropped in value to the point I was upside down.  I didn't lose anything because I kept the property.  The equity I recovered, and sold the property at a profit some years later...and continued to cash flow the entire time.

When you pay down the debt using your cash, you are buying money at a cost much higher than the money you bought.  If I let the tenant pay off my debt, instead of me, I'm ahead.  If I come out of pocket to pay off my debt, then the cash flow I'm getting, even if it's double what I was getting before I paid off the debt, is just "catching me up"...not making me money.

Basic math:

Spend $16k on a down payment (20%) with a $700/month cash flow ($8400/yr) means I start making a profit in the 24th month.

Spend $90k cash on a property (100% payoff) with $1075/m ($12,900/yr) means it will take 7 years before I break even and make a profit.  During those 7 years, you can count on having to replace the roof, and other misc items like the floors, appliances, etc...  This means more out of pocket cash you need to catch up to before you make a profit.

The bottom line is this.  Any and all cash you spend, is negative.  Income is positive.  If you spend more cash than you get back in profit...you are losing money.

In addition, you are losing the compounding effect of what you could get in added profits by investing with those funds you are spending by paying off the mortgage.

I'm not going to disagree with your post, I have the spreadsheets that back it up. With that being said, it's not the way I want to invest in real estate, nor would I recommend to the original poster of this thread. I love paid for assets, it gives me true freedom. I don't want to wait 20 or 30 years for a paid for asset. Too much could go wrong in life and being leveraged only makes it more dangerous. At the end of the day, it is my dept and my responsibility, not my tenants. Inevitably I will get all my money back plus a handsome bonus. 

Robert, all investing involves personal preferences and your personal comfort level with the risk / reward potential. We are all different, and approach things differently. The thing I try to urge everyone to do (so not really just directing this at you) is to make the effort to calculate the return on your investment. Then ask yourself, was it worth it? Most of the time, a paid for investment property (either paid for because it was bought with all cash to begin with or the loan has been repaid) is going to show an ROI of < 10%. There are exceptions of course, posters here on BP who buy very cheaply with all cash and are true local experts in their sub-market who may do better, and market appreciation may help you do better as well, but I suspect the vast majority of investors with paid for properties are earning < 10%. Take a simple example, a paid off house is worth $100K, you collect $1000 per month rent, perhaps your net income over a year is around $7000 long term (some years it will be higher, in other years when you replace a roof, or HVAC, it will be much lower), so that is a 7% ROI ($7,000 / $100,000). If the house appreciates 3% in the year, okay great now you're at 10% ROI. But you've put a lot of effort into that 10% ROI. Over the long term, investing in something like Vanguard's S&P 500 Index Fund VFINX will return 11% (that's what it's returned on average every year since its inception on 8/31/1976), and if you invested in it you did nothing but push a few buttons on your laptop. :-) So this is just food for thought, and to each his own, but when I look back at the work I've put into my investment properties over the years I now look for a minimum 20% ROI on every addition to my portfolio. In my market, this requires some leverage.

Originally posted by @Zach Cummins:

First of all, be present in the situation you are in. What an awesome dilemma to have!

My wife and I were recently in this situation with enough money in savings and individual investment portfolio to pay off our rental mortgage of 140k. We prayed about it and spoke with our financial advisor about it. And then I watched a YouTube video on Dave Ramsey. Look it up, it is called what To do if your investments can pay off your mortgage. He says, pay off the mortgage and if you don’t like the feeling of NOT having mortgage then go ahead and borrow on the property later.

We created an extra $730 in passive income monthly doing this. We are now one step closer to bringing my wife home from work to be with our son because this passive income is freed up!

Good luck!!

($730 x 12) / $140,000 = 6%. That's your ROI for paying off your mortgage early. I'd go borrow on that property again and look for an investment paying more than 6% but that's just me. :-)

Originally posted by @Son D.:

@Joe Splitrock when I started regretting investing with MI/OP I've already purchased property and paid rehab. It was not finished "rehabbing" in January yet. I used biggerpockets forum to post my story and update frequently to keep them publicly accountable. I believe it worked to a small extent. I think PM here would agree my property look a lot better, although still not up to standard living condition, than most MI/OP home they've seen. I hounded them to get an inspection right after I was told it was done "rehabbing". The inspection did not take place until March 28. I've already changed management.

I have to ask, when you say you hounded "them" to get a post-rehab inspection, are you saying you hounded MI/OP to do an inspection?  If so, why would you not have hired any third party inspector in the Indy area who would have been happy to inspect your house just as soon as he could put it on the schedule?  I realize this was probably a first-time investment for you and many others and not trying to be unduly critical but getting third-party (not seller-related) inspections is a pretty standard process when buying real estate.

Post: Seeking SFH Rental Buyers for Off Market Deals in Atlanta, GA

Stephen FlyntPosted
  • Alpharetta, GA
  • Posts 44
  • Votes 23

@Simmy Ahluwalia I'd be interested in seeing whatever you come across.