All Forum Posts by: Richard Dunlop
Richard Dunlop has started 7 posts and replied 715 times.
Post: No liquid cash

- Investor
- Detroit, MI
- Posts 755
- Votes 462
Originally posted by @Brian Mathews:
Originally posted by @Jerry Padilla:
You can get into an owner occupied FHA with only 3.5% down and you can ask for 6% sellers concessions to go towards closing costs. You still need to come up with the money for 3.5% down and the required 3 months of reserves if you purchase a 3-4 family. Do you have any one to gift the money to you?
Who would ask somebody to gift money to them? Especially for a real estate deal. I'm just curious if that is something you have run into. You need to make it on your own in life, not rely on others for handouts.
FHA does not allow a buyer to borrow money for their low down payments so "maybe" sometimes a loan is labeled a "gift".
Post: I am now convinced.....

- Investor
- Detroit, MI
- Posts 755
- Votes 462
Originally posted by @Karen Hurd:
Kevin Delaney I'm having dessert.
"I am no(sic) convinced"
Karen apparently you're convinced Realtors are the problem
There are people on this site who are Realtors
There are people on this site who like Realtors
There are people on this site who don't like Realtors
There are people on this site who are Wholesalers
There are people on this site who like Wholesalers.
There are people on this site who are confused about what you are trying to do. (me included)
All different kinds of people have tried to give you good advice in this thread and others. But you respond with insults.
I even discovered there are people on this site who appreciate @Kevin Delaney (you in previous threads)
There are people on this site who strongly dislike @Kevin Delaney (you in this thread)
See there are all types here.
My impression is that you don't really understand the Wholesaler business model; but there are many successful ones here so read and learn.
Post: New Member from Metro-Detroit

- Investor
- Detroit, MI
- Posts 755
- Votes 462
Originally posted by @Chris Hogg:
Hello everyone. My name is Chris and I am contractor/business owner of a painting and remodeling company in the Metro Detroit area. Been in business for myself a few years now and have been working in the construction field for the last 12 years, I have always wanted to get into real estate investing/rehab.
Currently I'm helping a investor/friend with a rehab project (doing most of the construction work) in the Warren area and I am still taking painting/remodeling work as well. The goal is to transition into a company rehabbing it's own properties.
This website has been a wealth of knowledge so I thank you and keep up the good work. Podcasts are great and so are the forums. I'm super excited to get a deal of my own going very soon.
Welcome to BP the market that you're in is the easy to get started in but has lots of challenges.
Post: Is 6% a good rate for being a silent partner?

- Investor
- Detroit, MI
- Posts 755
- Votes 462
Originally posted by @Richard C.:
My mind boggles at the notion of a "socially-responsible" gated community. Almost a contradiction in terms.
But to answer the question, 6% is too low.
The gates are only so the specially bred methane free goats can mow the lawn.
Post: 2% rule..is it still real?

- Investor
- Detroit, MI
- Posts 755
- Votes 462
Originally posted by @Steve Olafson:
Originally posted by @Richard Dunlop:
Yes there was a thread about 2 months ago where one poster said he would stay clear of properties that had a 2% gross rent because he would KNOW something was wrong with it.
Haha... To each their own...
I look for negative cashflow because that is where I see opportunity. That does not mean that I would say no to a property that actually had cashflow if the upside in value was still there.
I like what you have done. We are not on different sides of the table. We just approached it differently.
The flip side of the argument is people attribute to to me the assumption that I think appreciation is bad.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
My point has always been I believe in my market Appreciation will be way higher than most markets AND rents are way way way higher than 2%.
Post: 2% rule..is it still real?

- Investor
- Detroit, MI
- Posts 755
- Votes 462
Originally posted by @Steve Olafson:
Originally posted by @Richard Dunlop:
When I was starting out I had good credit but I had no money. I could not buy in an area that did not have good cash flow. Somebody has to pay the bills if not the tenant. Who would?
....Did anyone really say that cashflow is a bad thing?
Yes there was a thread about 2 months ago where one poster said he would stay clear of properties that had a 2% gross rent because he would KNOW something was wrong with it.
Post: Is 6% a good rate for being a silent partner?

- Investor
- Detroit, MI
- Posts 755
- Votes 462
Originally posted by @Jacobus Bor:
YES YES YES silent no problems no worries secure reliable yes yes yes
yes you can always speculate and get more OR LESSSSS
If you didn't already have 50 posts I would think you were @Olivia C.'s developer that she is in the process of vetting.
Why the enthusiasm? Most everyone else is saying she should get more.
@Olivia C. Test his confidence in his project by having him pledge his personal residence as additional security for your funding.
I don't think we are at the top yet but new developments crash fast when they can no longer presell from their models.
There are safer investments WITH better returns!
Post: 2% rule..is it still real?

- Investor
- Detroit, MI
- Posts 755
- Votes 462
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
Well I'm not Emily Post so I won't even try to address your bad manners but I do know some math and real estate. All three of you think a price to rent ratio predicts a return/yield when in fact it doesn't. You think a higher number is better when in it isn't....
All three of you would benefit from educating yourselves on return...
Your totally mischaracterize my points.
When I was starting out I had good credit but I had no money. I could not buy in an area that did not have good cash flow. Somebody has to pay the bills if not the tenant. Who would?
I could keep working and pay to maintain my tenants property on the hope that property values would increase.
My question has always been why choose between cash flow and appreciation.
Why not BOTH?
I think the market I'm in will have better appreciation over the next ten years than the market I left (CA)
AND Cash Flow!
Post: If you had 180k how would you invest it

- Investor
- Detroit, MI
- Posts 755
- Votes 462
Originally posted by @John Horner:
Originally posted by @Leo F.:
$180,000 investment and 20,000 per month cash flow… Sign me up!
Did I miss something in this conversation?
I agree, maybe he meant per year???
No I did mean to say $20,000 per month. See the example I gave above. It is not typical (YMMV) but I have others that will be better than that one.
Post: Cashflow Doesn't Build Wealth?

- Investor
- Detroit, MI
- Posts 755
- Votes 462
Originally posted by @Jay Hinrichs:
What happens with this out of state buying phenom is the what I call
GET YOURSELF STARTED IN REAL ESTATE syndrome....
Jay I agree with all of your assessment and this thread is debating: "is cash flow or appreciation more important."
My question is why not both?
You refer to the gentrification of downtown Sacramento, have you looked at the gentrification of downtown Detroit?
My personal opinion is Detroit reached the very bottom in 2010 and is coming back way too fast!
Downtown has 98-99% occupancy rate. Dan Gilbert has invested about $2 Billion in the past 5 years.
When I was in school in Santa Clara (San Jose) lots of areas of Oakland scared me more than Detroit does today. I've not seen it but I'm told it's coming back.
You refer to out of state want to be investors and when people approach me on BP and other contacts I insist they have to come up here and actually see what is happening. But there are many many properties where they could give away 80% of the deal and still make a fortune.
People in this thread talk about 11% gains for year over year for long spans of time. My neighborhood has done way better and I expect it to continue for years to come. Bought my house for $16,000 when it was worth $75,000. Six years on it is worth $225-$250,000 today.
1800 Sq ft Wood frame house in my neighborhood just sold for $219,900. Mine is 4700 Sq ft built out of 500lb quarried stones. But people laugh at my valuation because it's Detroit. (Over built? yes but still a great value)
Metro Detroit has problems, Yes, But it also has SF homes that would sell for $10,000,000.00 in today's down market.
Detroit was about 60% auto industry now is rebuilding as about 9-10% dependant on auto. Like Pittsburg shed its dependance on the steel industry.
My personal prediction (I'm no expert) is Detroit will see double digit appreciation for the forseeable future. Much better than most other markets.
Detroit needs the the money changers /HML to come back.
I started with $150 (I had good credit) and now have $750,000 in Equity.
Appreciation OR Cash Flow?
Why not BOTH?