@William Bohan as others outlined, there are several logical options, all with pros and cons (of course.) Another option is to just keep what you have. Do you live in that area? Do you believe in it’s mid to long term growth potential? If you live there you probably have a good handle on the subtle market dynamics.
One significant risk of buying any property out of state is that you have a lot less knowledge and first hand experience with all the nuances of that specific market. You simply can’t ignore the risk of investing in an area that you’re not intimately familiar with. And now with rates being high, plus many areas overbuilt with new apartment buildings, I’d be careful with unknown areas, and also what you read in the media about “hot” areas, up and comers, etc.
I was in a similar situation to yours a couple years ago. In my case I sold off appreciated properties in a location I deemed as having limited future upside, and used the proceeds to eliminate all debt on the better located prime properties I wanted to keep long term. I’m in CA also and paid cap gains on huge profits to the tune of 28%, which included CA state cap gains. I was lucky to split the sales over 2 years, so the first ~80k gain is tax free and 80-480k was at 15%, which I was able to take advantage of twice. (Over 480k was at 20%.) So that helped.
I personally wanted to be more conservative as I pretty much reach “the number” that I needed (note that what “I needed” is different from what “I wanted” or what I was expecting by default.) In my case I was lucky that I still kept half of my portfolio, so didn’t get out of the RE game altogether. But always remember that RE is a risky venture, and you could go through years of less than stellar performance. So think twice before taking any outsized risks, as you already achieved a nice equity base, and you don’t want to end up screwing the pooch by taking unneeded risks ;)
Good luck and keep us posted on your decisions…