Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Samuel Riehn

Samuel Riehn has started 1 posts and replied 30 times.

Post: Is this strategy Legit?

Samuel RiehnPosted
  • Investor
  • San Antonio, TX
  • Posts 30
  • Votes 11
Originally posted by @Andrew Johnson:

@Samuel Riehn It's fun to think through.  I think they'd have an appraiser in on the scam and it's #2 who gets short changed.  #1 could just bribe a renter to pay over market rent for a few months for the rehabbed unit so that #2 feels that it would cash-flow.  The bribed appraiser appraises it at $200K,  person #2 is now saddled with a $160K mortgage, it fake cash-flows as long as the shill renter pays rent.  Once that renters leaves, it can only rent out at market value and #2 and the bank are stuck holding the $160K note.  #2 ends up either upside down or foreclosed upon by the bank.  #1 ends up with $80K in their pocket.  

Yeah, my brain has been wrapping itself around this mess ever since. Its good to get fresh eyes on it, and talk about it.  I'm just happy my first post on bigger pockets was able to bring something new. I guess adds value to know the types of schemes out there.

Post: Is this strategy Legit?

Samuel RiehnPosted
  • Investor
  • San Antonio, TX
  • Posts 30
  • Votes 11
Originally posted by @Jassem A.:

@Samuel Riehn

I don't see a problem with helping out family or allowing family to help you but I try not to mix family with business. The loss you are taking each month will likely reduce your DTI and might prevent you from obtaining another mortgage in the future.

Absolutely agree, it could drive a wedge. But I think of it more as a gift than a loan or a lease, if he doesn't pay I'm fine with shouldering the cost myself. Actually expecting that to happen, so anything I do get will be a surprise but not an expectation. And as far as the DTI I actually would appreciate the loss to curb my LLC's tax bill.

Post: Is this strategy Legit?

Samuel RiehnPosted
  • Investor
  • San Antonio, TX
  • Posts 30
  • Votes 11

@JD Martin

I was actually being told that I would be Guy 1# for the first round, and they would give me the 20% up front to go find a property I liked. So... yeah idk wtf was I thinking, this is crazy!

Only in  Vegas lol

Post: Is this strategy Legit?

Samuel RiehnPosted
  • Investor
  • San Antonio, TX
  • Posts 30
  • Votes 11
Originally posted by @Michael P.:

This is 100% a scam.  

No legit deals ever start out this way. Dude flies you to Vegas and buys you a watch?  WTF Scam.

No person worth Millions has any legit reasons why he needs your help. Scam.

And I would wager you get to be guy #3.  The other two get bought out and you are left holding the bag with a house not worth anywhere close to what you just paid.  

Scam Scam Scam

I don't even like Apple! haha. Yeah you're very very likely right. Don't know why I didn't see it when I was there.  Took a few nights of sleeping on it before I realized how shady it was.

Post: Is this strategy Legit?

Samuel RiehnPosted
  • Investor
  • San Antonio, TX
  • Posts 30
  • Votes 11
Originally posted by @JD Martin:

Wow. There are so many holes in this thing I'm glad it's not a canoe, and I'm glad I'm not in it?

What are the chances you buy a house for $100k, spend zero dollars on rehab on it, and have it be worth $200k?

What are the chances of an appraiser magically making it out to $200k without any real money having been spent on rehab? I've done cash-out on lots of houses I owned, cash, and few of them doubled in less than a year and that was *after* spending good money on a rehab.

What are the chances that you find a renter willing to pay some much in rent that when Guy #2 buys it for an inflated price, it's still a cash-flow monster?

What happens when any of the following happen:

Appraisal on House #1 doesn't cut it and Guy #2 declines to purchase;

Renter on House #1 was a scam, or left early, and renter #2 doesn't pay enough for Guy #2 to cover his costs?

Guy #1 decides he doesn't want to pay for Guy #3's house and just keeps his cash in his pocket?

    There were two ways they thought of doing this. 1) buying HUD blind auction homes (obviously nowhere near 100K I used that as an easy example) and reno them and get a HUD renter in there paying 10% of the home's purchase price every month. Or 2) Pretty sure they intended to develop properties, buy land at auction or tax lien and build. Doubling their money is probably unreasonable and unlikely, again, I used fictional numbers. But you're right, things look way to rosy, and there are way too many things that could go wrong. I'm out.

    Post: Is this strategy Legit?

    Samuel RiehnPosted
    • Investor
    • San Antonio, TX
    • Posts 30
    • Votes 11

    @Jassem A.

    I was actually looking to try it out with my Father. He is on the edge of retirement age and just had a brain aneurysm that will likely force him into retirement. He owns 2 homes, one is under construction that probably needs $60K to finish, he has taken HELOC's out on his primary residence throughout his life to maintain liquidity in his company, so even though he's been in the home I grew up in for 26 years he still owes 130K. I had an appraiser come out and said that it was worth 200K. If I bought his home for full retail, and had him pay me low rent for the rest of his life, I can write off the losses and he will pay for my down payment thru annual $10K tax-free gifts. He would have 70K to finish construction on his second home which he can sell free and clear for easily 180K. That, along with the sale of his business assets, would be his retirement.

    Meanwhile I own a $200K home that I paid no money down on, and I'm taking several hundred dollar loss on rent per month, but I'm taking care of my dad.  Plus, I wont have to pay for property management or anything to maintain the home because he always has and will still do repairs himself.   

    Post: Is this strategy Legit?

    Samuel RiehnPosted
    • Investor
    • San Antonio, TX
    • Posts 30
    • Votes 11

    @Jassem A. 

    I haven't actually been presented a property from the group yet. I was just using the made up numbers given during our meeting. But using those values I would want at least 16-1800/month gross rent.  Based on the areas that they operate out of (Baltimore, Alaska, and parts of Florida) I think that would be possible.

    Post: Is this strategy Legit?

    Samuel RiehnPosted
    • Investor
    • San Antonio, TX
    • Posts 30
    • Votes 11
    Originally posted by @Jassem A.:

    @Samuel Riehn

    Sounds like it could work if you would want to buy at 80-90% of appraisal.  I typically look to buy at closer 50% but I can understand how this might not be possible for all buyers because of competition and having to show up at the courthouse steps with cash and take on more risk in order to obtain that kind of deal.

    Right. 

    Though as a military guy I know there are wanna be investors or regular guys buying retail value homes with the VA loan for 105% LTV after they roll in that VA funding fee. I'm not necessarily afraid of buying 90% of appraisal if the rents are still cash flowing. These are A-B neighborhoods they'd be looking to buy in.

    Post: Is this strategy Legit?

    Samuel RiehnPosted
    • Investor
    • San Antonio, TX
    • Posts 30
    • Votes 11
    Originally posted by @Johnson Jacks:

    This seems pretty similar to a real estate scam, the name of which escapes me.  Basically, a group of investors flip properties to each other (usually land within a particular new development) and make it look like they are arms length transactions between unrelated parties, each time at say a 5-10% premium or even 30% premium over the previous "purchase" price, depending on how aggressive they want to get.  Eventually, they try to sell to an unrelated third party, and they use the history of non-arms length transactions to justify a sales prices that might be two to four times higher than the original investors paid a year or two before.  An alternative approach is to not bother selling to the third party, but simply sell to a related party using bank financing, and then skip town while leaving the bank with worthless collateral.  This has obviously become a less popular way to do the scam as there's no way to do it that way without the negative effects following you around.  

    This doesn't sound exactly like that scam. It sounds like the goal is just to use non-arms length transactions to squeeze a little bit more LTV out of the properties. But I'm still not sure that wouldn't be found to be illegal if you did a non-arms length transaction just to increase the leverage available to you and your partners.

    That is a new one to me, but yeah that does sound similar.  I agree, the law favors the banks in these types of situations which is why I'd rather not bother with it.  I think you're right, this strategy I don't think is intended to be a scam but instead a way to add value to the team by buying at best-case valuations, and splitting profits.  The smaller guys keep the rentals for longterm income, the bigger guy gets more to keep building.  I may have painted these guys to be scummier than they are. Like I said I've known Mike for years and don't think he's a scammer, cant speak for the other one, but for the limited times we've talked since I don't think he is capable of that.

    What I cant help but keep coming back to is the slight difference between this and a cash out refinance. When cashing out in a BRRR, we always try to get that valuation as high as possible to take as much money back out as possible (at least that's what I've gathered in my 6 months reading and listening to bigger pockets). Yet the selling at highest possibility valuation to someone willing (though arms length is questionable) to pay higher is somehow very bad/illegal. Doing it wrong the latter leaves the buyer with a lower value house, while doing it wrong with the BRRR can leave ME with the lower value asset. Makes you think...

    Post: Is this strategy Legit?

    Samuel RiehnPosted
    • Investor
    • San Antonio, TX
    • Posts 30
    • Votes 11
    Originally posted by @Jassem A.:

    @Samuel Riehn

    I have not heard of a situation where the seller is permitted to reimburse the buyer any part of the down payment. I suppose it could be done  with some maneuvering and might make it easier to offload rental properties to other investors more easily. I'd speak with a real estate attorney first.

    Absolutely, attorney's are the answer. But I've seen it done on Wall Street, the parent LLC just needs to hold a stake in the sub or yieldco LLC, then the money can flow back and forth pretty easily under "MSA's" and other tools. The subsidiary LLC would just need to maintain the corporate veil as a separate entity, in this case, backed by myself or Mike. We would be the ones looked into for credit checks.