Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Brian Eastman

Brian Eastman has started 4 posts and replied 2797 times.

Post: recommendation of banks for Solo 401k checking account

Brian Eastman
Pro Member
Posted
  • Self Directed IRA & 401k Advisor
  • Wenatchee, WA
  • Posts 2,877
  • Votes 2,533

@Joshua Talamante

It is actually not that common for Solo 401(k) bank accounts to exceed $250K in cash for any extended period of time.  

Once the plan has invested into assets like real estate or securities, that value is no longer covered by FDIC. Only the cash portion is insured.

If your plan has multiple participants, each would have $250K coverage on their cash account within the plan.

If you will be in cash for an extended period of time, you can check to see if your bank offers enhanced FDIC coverage through a service called IntraFi. You can alternately split your cash between different banks if needed.

Post: ROBS 401K for Fix & Flip

Brian Eastman
Pro Member
Posted
  • Self Directed IRA & 401k Advisor
  • Wenatchee, WA
  • Posts 2,877
  • Votes 2,533

@Jeff Drury  When you work with a professional firm that establishes a ROBS program, they will assist with the valuation process.  How that is addressed will depend on whether this is a new venture funded with cash, an acquisition, a round of expansion funding, etc.

Post: Quest Trust Suddenly Closed down Administration on their Solo 401K Plans

Brian Eastman
Pro Member
Posted
  • Self Directed IRA & 401k Advisor
  • Wenatchee, WA
  • Posts 2,877
  • Votes 2,533
Quote from @Michael Plaks:

Quest is no more. It has been sold to Inspira.

For those who are interested in some background, here is today's public Facebook post from  my friend John Hyre, the brilliant tax attorney well known to most real estate investors, one of the keynote speakers at every Quest Expo.

======================================================

by John M Hyre III
8/1/2024

With regard to Quest:

I am rushed (as usual) and haven’t the time to write. But I also haven’t the time to wait because people are people. And people are fast to panic, to turn on others, to talk smack. Also, the other custodial vultures are circling. But I also have to have a care. Being both a lawyer (e.g., privileged communication) and Youngstowner (where omerta is still a thing), I sometimes learn things I cannot discuss. Facts will also change, I'll edit as appropriate.

So.

Quest Trust aka Quest IRA sold to Millenium Trust (now Inspira, ugh, did the Bud Light marketing lady get hired there? OK, it's just a name). The sale evidently resulted in Quest's owners getting zippo (hearsay, working to confirm that).

Per Beatriz Adkins (acting Prez at Quest), Inspira shall honor Quest's pricing schedule. Which based on the gnashing of (mostly "frugal" REI) teeth, was the lowest in the industry (for most of you, especially with multiple, active accounts).

I have my IRA, HSA, and CESA accounts (more on Solo's shortly) with Quest. They shall go to Inspira and remain there (especially with the transfer of the pricing structure) unless Inspira gives me reason to move them. They get a chance.

Quest had two kinds of 401k’s: The cheap version and one with a “Does bookkeeping and some (perhaps all) federal forms” apps. They were priced differently. The cheap DIY (“rent a plan”) 401k’s need to be moved to a new custodian. Some people online (I’d be especially wary of prior Quest employees who were long ago let go as well as opportunistic custodian vultures) are being real a**hats & throwing tantrums over that…along with Quincy under the bus. A few thoughts on that:

1) The reason those accounts are “administratively unfeasible” is that they were so cheap that nobody (like say Inspira) wanted them, even for free. THAT is the kind of value Quest gave. You got a screaming bargain that was so good that no one else wanted it from the provider side, even for free. So, for the crap-talkers & whiners, maybe a little gratitude would be in order.

2) There are other rent-a-SoloK-plan providers out there who let you DIY for a pretty low fee. Moving to one of them involves some paperwork & hassle. That’s life, things happen. Be grateful for the screaming deal you had, adapt to change. It’s not that big of a deal.

For those who had Quest’s “fancier” 401k with the app that does an awful lot: Those accounts are being moved to SEPIRAK. It’s run by JP Ruiz. JP Ruiz: Knows more about 401ks than anyone I’ve ever met…crazy smart, articulate, highly inappropriate sense of humor. He and his team built the app that Quest’s “fancy” 401k used. People on that app with Quest shall be on exactly the same app (which does an awful lot for the money…some of you are so penny wise, pound foolish when it comes to your time & money, valuing the latter over the former by much too much) with different window dressing. That’s it. 

So everyone take a Quaalude or whatever it is people use nowadays.

As to “The Texas Banking Commission destroyed Quest” and “Boy, did Quincy mess up” crowd: Screw you and your backbiting ways.

First, I am biased. I’ve known Q for over 20 years. I did and do consider him a Man Among Men. But not without reason. 

There’s the genius. Everyone knows about that, so I’ll move along.

There’s also the big heart…minus the Jesus fish on the sleeve or the cards. He lives it without bragging about it – which is how it is supposed to be done. It’s not my place to cross that line…but let’s just say I learned of some serious generosity on his part, generosity that most of us cannot or will not (mostly “will not” from what I’ve seen) match – and I did not learn of it from Quincy. Some honest little birds might have mentioned a few things…. God bless good-hearted, honest little birds.

There’s the fighter. Parkinson’s scares me, probably more than death itself. Q has handled it manfully, with gratitude (“it could always be worse”) and attitude. In Quest he and his attitude built a thing that I (and 99% of you) sure as **** could not have. He was at the heart (and brain) of a fantastic educational operation – one that was undervalued because he did not charge much for it. He wrote a great & practical book – with Parkinson’s, dammit. He taught deal structuring that has helped many make & protect wealth. 

He does have a blind spot. He sometimes attributes his own good nature to those who do not deserve it. It is a weakness, but a noble one. You might think about that one for a second.

But the Texas Department of Banking! 

Yeah, they hit Quest with an order (with which Quest was complying before being sold) – after Q had stepped back. How dare he! Yeah, screw those of you who “think” that. Even someone of his phenomenal fortitude has limits against a dread disease. And even (no “especially”) someone who has done so much for so many (that awesome free or cheap education, those fees so cheap at Quest that he evidently sold for nada and, as to most of the 401k’s, no one wanted them even for free) perhaps deserves a freaking break. Both a literal break (time off, not legs) and perhaps a little freaking grace (especially from those of you who profess to be Christians). 

I do NOT trust “regulators”. Google Operation Chokepoint for just ONE example of what banking regulators do with their massive power. These same banking regulators required banks (which include Trust Companies) to hold reserves of safe assets. One of those “safe” assets are US Treasury bonds. Talk about self-serving! For those of you who follow the news, banks did what the regulators (who could instantly destroy them at any time, why do you think Operation Chokepoint worked? “Be a shame if sometin happened to dat liddle bank of youz”) forced them to do: Bought T-Bills as “Safe Assets”. Then what? The Fed raised rates and dropped the values of those T-Bills. Which meant that the banks suddenly did not have enough “safe” assets like that super-valuable & honest Treasury Paper. Some banks adapted. Some – almost invariably small ones that did not or could not adapt fast enough to suit their regulatory Masters – had to be sold for pennies on the dollar to banks that are Too Big To Fail. That is, banks that are connected enough to have, umm, “fewer regulatory issues” and ex-employees or soon-to-be employees “regulating” them. And when the Too Big To Fail banks fail? Bailouts! Nice gig. Screw up, get bailed out. Someone little screws up – buy them for a song. A great book on the overall subject is Jonathan Tepper’s “The Myth of Capitalism: Monopolies and the Death of Capitalism”. Tepper is no leftist, very much the opposite. Just setting some context here. Quest was a little bank. A buyer needed, I heard through the grapevine, $100M of liquid capital to acquire them for very darned little. Hmm, no pattern here. Nope.

But let’s say the Texas Banking Commission was right: Q screwed up. I’m not so sure, but let’s say. He loses his baby. He spent 20 years building it. Providing superior service, cheaply. Doing a lot for employees (not that he’d expound on that, not in his nature). Creating something 99% of us simply could not do. A brief inattention with horrid regs and horrid regulators (talk to small community bank officers & owners privately & with alcohol. I have.) and 20 years of excellence at generous prices, all gone. Sorry, no soup for you. Have a nice day. 

The customers were protected. The employees were protected.

But some of you want to pile on? 

I think Q paid dearly for errors he did or did not make. He built a great thing that helped a great many people. He did it while confronting obstacles that would make invalids of most. He confronted (and still does confront, present tense) the hand he was dealt with dignity and a “no excuses” approach. Good Lord, given what he’s accomplished with his challenges (not just Quest, but also being a very good man), what in the heck is our excuse for doing less?

Quest account holders face some inconvenience. Big deal.

Show a Great Man some grace and Heaven forfend, a little gratitude. 

PS: I don’t think Q is done. I don’t think Q is capable of being done until it’s time for him to depart this mortal coil. Good.

PPS: When reading or listening to the smack talkers, the ones who kick when one is down…you are next if they get the chance. Just saying.

 Thank you for sharing this Michael.

John is spot-on about what a quality human being Quincy is and what a great role he has played in building the self-directed investment industry over the last 20 years.  It is very unfortunate what has happened as a result of interest rate changes.  Quincy has always put his clients and his staff first.  We could use more leaders with his character.

Post: Quest Trust Suddenly Closed down Administration on their Solo 401K Plans

Brian Eastman
Pro Member
Posted
  • Self Directed IRA & 401k Advisor
  • Wenatchee, WA
  • Posts 2,877
  • Votes 2,533
Quote from @Jag C.:
Quote from @Brian Eastman:

@Tina Artigliere

The company SEPiraK provided software for Solo 401(k) recordkeeping to Quest.   

I understand they are planning to to offer recordkeeping and plan document maintenance services to Quest clients with no cost to transition.  This is true whether those clients were on the optional recordkeeping program or not.

I don't have a lot of details and am not personally involved in this program in any way, but I have experience with SEPiraK separately and they are a quality operation.

You can reach out to info at sepirak dot com to learn more.


 Brian I am looking at them as well - how long have you been with them? I am with Nabers and would prefer to move to a platform that provides robust book keeping and filing services. 

I do not have a role with any of the parties involved.  

I was a self-directed plan provider for 16+ years and have retired from working directly in the plan provisioning space.  I currently consult within the industry, so was aware that SEPira(k) is likely the best home for anyone from Quest needing a new Solo 401(k) provider.  

I just wanted to share that resource and potentially de-stress Quest 401(k) holders.

Post: Self-directed IRAs and rehab

Brian Eastman
Pro Member
Posted
  • Self Directed IRA & 401k Advisor
  • Wenatchee, WA
  • Posts 2,877
  • Votes 2,533

@Ryan Daulton

It sounds like a conversation with your IRA plan provider is in order.

Perhaps this will help. YOU are not purchasing the property using IRA money. The IRA is purchasing the property as an investment.

Because income to the IRA is tax-sheltered, you must keep it distinctly separate from yourself or close family members. Any kind of self-dealing or co-mingling of funds can void your IRA, with severe tax consequencees.

Post: Quest Trust Suddenly Closed down Administration on their Solo 401K Plans

Brian Eastman
Pro Member
Posted
  • Self Directed IRA & 401k Advisor
  • Wenatchee, WA
  • Posts 2,877
  • Votes 2,533

@Tina Artigliere

The company SEPiraK provided software for Solo 401(k) recordkeeping to Quest.   

I understand they are planning to to offer recordkeeping and plan document maintenance services to Quest clients with no cost to transition.  This is true whether those clients were on the optional recordkeeping program or not.

I don't have a lot of details and am not personally involved in this program in any way, but I have experience with SEPiraK separately and they are a quality operation.

You can reach out to info at sepirak dot com to learn more.

Post: Which Self-directed IRA company do you use?

Brian Eastman
Pro Member
Posted
  • Self Directed IRA & 401k Advisor
  • Wenatchee, WA
  • Posts 2,877
  • Votes 2,533

@Katie P.

It seems that Quest is exiting the Solo 401(k) line of business.

The company SEPiraK provided software for Solo 401(k) recordkeeping to Quest.

I understand they are planning to to offer recordkeeping and plan document maintenance services to Quest clients with no cost to transition. This is true whether those clients were on the optional recordkeeping program or not.

I don't have a lot of details and am not personally involved in this program, but I have experience with SEPiraK separately and they are a quality operation.

You can reach out to info at sepirak com to learn more.

Post: Conflicting info asset valuation for in-kind RMD's from real estate

Brian Eastman
Pro Member
Posted
  • Self Directed IRA & 401k Advisor
  • Wenatchee, WA
  • Posts 2,877
  • Votes 2,533

@John Cava

I missed a key point of your original question, but it goes back to discussing valuation with your custodian.

You will value the property to get the new value.

The IRA at this time will own 90%, so the valuation the custodian cares about is that 90%. They are only concerned with current value of the asset on their books.

They likely want to also see the full value so they can illustrate they are paying attention as a recordkeeper.

Post: Conflicting info asset valuation for in-kind RMD's from real estate

Brian Eastman
Pro Member
Posted
  • Self Directed IRA & 401k Advisor
  • Wenatchee, WA
  • Posts 2,877
  • Votes 2,533

@John Cava
Start by discussing the matter of valuation with your IRA custodian. Their policy may or may not require a certified 3rd party appraisal for any taxable event such as a distribution in kind.

Current valuation is all that matters here.  The rest is up to you.  

- If you want to own 20% of the property, then take the value that gets you there.  

- If you want to take specifically $50K, that may or may not equate to 10% of the total value. In that case, you could end up with person at 81.68% or 77.23% or whatever, and the IRA with the balance. It will then likely take more than 10 years to fully distribute the property as it appreciates in value.

The key to this exercise is that what was taken out last year does not matter.  The value resets, and the dollars you take out will determine the new equity split at that point in time.  

The same would be true if you had $500K of Apple stock and wanted to distribute it to yourself over a 10-year period.  You might have to take more or less than $50K in any given year to meet that target since the stock price would change over time.  Of course, you would not have a remaining equity split to deal with, but the dollars per distribution/time to distribute concept is the same.

BTW, in 16 years of setting up self-directed IRA plans, fractional distributions in-kind was my least favorite strategy. There is so much complexity and risk involved. If potential clients wanted to do that, we strongly encouraged them to work directly with a tax attorney with specific knowledge of IRA rules. (Not just any CPA, attorney, or even tax attorney).

Post: ROBS 401K for Fix & Flip

Brian Eastman
Pro Member
Posted
  • Self Directed IRA & 401k Advisor
  • Wenatchee, WA
  • Posts 2,877
  • Votes 2,533

@John N Cook

If you have $200K + in retirement funds, other capital, experience with construction, and want to explore creating a real estate development company doing 3+ flips or spec homes per year, check out a ROBS.  

It is not a tool to tap funds for a single flip.