Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Ryan Zaninovich

Ryan Zaninovich has started 8 posts and replied 23 times.

Post: Remove solar lien after trustee sale

Ryan ZaninovichPosted
  • Investor
  • Bakersfield, CA
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 11

HI Laura,

I'm sorry you are dealing with a solar lease situation. No, I don't have experience with Solar Mosiac, however, most of these solar companies operate in a similar way. It seems to me that the minute the government got involved these solar companies started acting like they were protected and did not need to give any customer service. 

My situation did not really end well for either party. We had to hire an attorney and racked up legal fees that amounted to what the solar system was worth in the first place. We ended up not paying anything to the solar company but spent just as much. 

Unfortunately, there is not a whole lot of legal precedent out there for these solar lease situations and the solar companies are banking on that because they know most homeowners cannot afford to take them to court and sue them. You didn't give much detail in your post about your situation but the only way we got through to them was to hire an attorney. The attorney's name who worked for the solar company was James MaCleod. If anyone reading this comes up against him send me a message and I might be able to help.

Maybe if you share some more information about your situation you might get some more detailed advice. Hope you find a solution.

Post: Remove solar lien after trustee sale

Ryan ZaninovichPosted
  • Investor
  • Bakersfield, CA
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 11

I'm dealing with this issue as well, but it is with Sunstreet Solar. The options they gave us were 1) leave the panels in place but get no benefit and do no harm to them 2) purchase the panels (we were quoted the full retail price which is ridiculous) 3) sign a new agreement IF AND WHEN we wanted to. That all sounded fine really so we put them in touch with our buyers so they could explain those options to them as well. They took that opportunity to scare them in the hopes that we or they would pay them something for their equipment. They lied to the buyers and told them they would be responsible for paying the lien or they would have to sign an agreement with Sunstreet at close of escrow. The attorney is actually a debt collector so you can imagine his demeanor and ethics.


Now the buyer and I want their equipment removed and have sent a certified letter stating so. Their attorney is claiming they do not have to remove the panels. We will see what their response is once they receive my request for removal. 

I am a little surprised this hasn't been fully settled by the courts at this point. It seems very clear to me. They have a UCC that shows they still own the panels, however, we do not have an agreement with them and are not in default in any way. Their property is on our home and we want them to come and collect it or it will have been adandoned and we will petition to have the UCC removed. Seems cut and dry. We are willing to see this all the way through and get this settled. I'm not sure why they think they are special and get to play by different rules. If you leave your property on my property and I ask that you come and get it but you refuse then you are forfeiting your right to that property. If my buyers walk then I will be forced to sue them for any monetary damages that will cause as well. I just don't see how this ends well for them.

If anyone has an update to how this went for them please share that!

Connection sent Rich. Shoot me a message when you get a chance. Thanks.

The true property value is probably around $1.65 and the reason I got the deal at such a good price is because the doctor is moving and had to sell before he could be approved for the next building and this was a 1031 exchange with all that entails. So I was aware when I purchased it would be vacant soon. He was supposed to leave late last year but there was a construction delay with his new building and I wasn't going to kick him out at such a good return. The current timeframe is it will be vacant in May (unless there is another delay). It is already being marketed and should attract a tenant fairly quickly as it is the only vacancy in a high end medical park consisting of 20 other buildings. 

So without at least a one year lease agreement I'm dead in the water on a LOC? Even with owning the building outright and it being worth what it is worth? I'm only looking for maybe $250,000 to $500,000 so the LTV would be incredibly low. I can always change it up later on when I have a more favorable lease agreement in place. What about hard money options? Is a deal such as this something that a hard money lender would be interested in?

And, again, thank you for the help!

Hi Roger,

Thanks for the reply. The lease is month to month. The doctor is going to be moving eventually to a new location but it is unclear when that might happen. The property is only 8 years old and is in excellent condition. It will appraise very well for at least $1.5 if not more. 

My Fico is 825 and I have more than $100,000 in cash so it would seem I have the credit and liquidity requirements? 

Any advice on what bank to start with? Or am I wasting my time without a tenant in a long term lease agreement? Without a long term lease agreement will a bank still loan but at a lower LTV?

Hello everyone,

I own a commercial building worth $1.5 million that is unemcumbered. I purchased it a little over 6 months ago. It is leased by the doctor I purchased it from with a month to month triple net at $9200 a month. I'd like to get a LOC on this building. Can anyone give me some advice on how much I can expect a bank would be willing to loan on this? Is my credit and other income a factor (I guess a better question is how much of a factor are those items in this situation) or is the building the main consideration? Also, what type of banks/institutions would be inclined to do this type of loan? Anyone have a referral?

Thanks!

Post: Post Frame Home Construction

Ryan ZaninovichPosted
  • Investor
  • Bakersfield, CA
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 11

@David Beard Hi David, I know a few people have asked for an update to this project without success but I thought I would throw my hat in the ring. Did any of this come to fruition? If not could you tell us why and if it did we would all love an update I am sure!

Post: Is there any decent market left to still get a decent return?

Ryan ZaninovichPosted
  • Investor
  • Bakersfield, CA
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 11

Wow, great responses everyone!

To clarify a few things. When I said 50% cost I was referring to lower end properties, really at the very lower end because those are the ones where I seem to be able to find decent returns even at higher costs. With higher grade properties I normally use 40%. Also, that would include property taxes and property management. I also think sometimes people underestimate or don't properly account for longer term cap ex costs so there is some money allocated there as well (maybe more than some people allocate). Having said all that, if someone out there has, say, 10 or more properties in one of the lowest class peoperty/neighborhood types and they are using property management, if they aren't at 50% for their costs they should probably take a second look to be sure they are including everything. Like I said, over 15 years doing this and we have properties all over and with different managers in different states and that is the reality for us anyway. Sometimes we've experienced even higher costs than that! That's just an average!

The other thing is that if I wanted to find a property that met my numbers I am sure I could. Like some of you mentioned it's simply a matter of looking hard enough and being willing to put some reno into the property. I guess what I am really saying is that if somebody needed/wanted to invest bigger sums of money in rentals in a relatively short period of time it would be very difficult to do that and still make a return better than 7.5%. More than likely I would have to purchase out of state, quickly and probably find multiple properties which makes it that much more difficult. 5 years ago or even before the crisis, it was totally possible but now it is more like finding the needle in the haystack and all the extra work limits how many you can accumulate quickly at those return levels.

We actually flipped our entire portfolio recently just because the value no longer made the returns good. The only way we were able to do that was because we found that great deal on a bunch of SFRs. Like someone else said, we sold in a higher value market and 1031'd into one of the few undervalued markets that are left. But we were sort of lucky to have found that deal and I don't want to be any heavier in that particular market. 

Oh, and I agree about Detroit. I actually flew there a year ago and met with a number of agents/turn key people and I left without buying anything. If you don't live there and know that market inside and out I think you have to be lucky not to get into trouble. 

I think, at least for the near term, I will look into some of the alternative methods of investing in real estate like some mentioned in this thread. But, I still need to invest that 1031 money in like kind property somewhere so hopefully I can find some decent returns in the next month or two.

Post: Is there any decent market left to still get a decent return?

Ryan ZaninovichPosted
  • Investor
  • Bakersfield, CA
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 11

Hi Everyone,

My wife and I have been buy/hold investors for going on 15 years now. For most of that time you could find an okay deal as long as you did your homework and were willing to look outside your local market. I think it is sort of funny watching through the years as everyone's criteria for what they call a good deal keeps changing as the market keeps going up.

I guess each person's idea of a good deal is going to be shaped by their local market, so at one time when things were really good our criteria was that we netted out a 12% return with a rental purchased with cash. My defeinition of net usually ends up assuming costs of 50% of rent so that was a pretty good deal! It's been a long time since we've achieved anything close to that. We did make some large SFR investments recently and I hope to end up close to 10% on those, but it was in a very risky market and we sort of got lucky.

I'm writing this post because I'm curious what all the other buy/hold cash investors are doing these days? At this point I'd be willing to accept a 7.5% return on a house purchased with cash and assuming 50% costs. I'm not finding anything close to that anywhere (other than maybe Detroit and we are already heavy in that area). The other thing is I'm not really talking about finding one house and fixing it up. I'm sure with some effort and time I could find that sort of return on one house. I'm more talking we have quite a bit of money sitting and wanting to purchase a lot of houses and average out to that return. I've spoken to several of the turn key type businesses but by the time they take their cut almost all of them are in the 5% range. Oh they will tell you it's right up at 10% but conveniently leave out some major cost center or use anticipated appreciation or something else to arrive at that number. I find that their rents are almost always inflated as well. Even the foreclosure prices are too high, at the point where by the time you get them fixed up there goes your return.

What is everyone doing? Just accepting the low returns? Refusing to buy? Going to war zones like Detroit and taking their chances? To make matters worse, I have a 1031 exchange coming that is a result of something outside of my control so one way or another I am buying something! The last year or two is the only time in the 15 years I've been doing this where I really am starting to think it's just not a good investment any more.

Post: Insurance/Self Insurance options?

Ryan ZaninovichPosted
  • Investor
  • Bakersfield, CA
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 11

Thanks for the responses guys. 

Greg, the cities are Saginaw, Muskegon etc. 

Jason, are you able to quote out of state?