Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Rachel S.

Rachel S. has started 2 posts and replied 120 times.

Originally posted by @Mike Franco:


@Daniel McNulty

Hey, Donald Trump's dad gave him such a gift. I should be doing the same.

I don't mind sweat equity. I might even want to ramp up to 20 units for a $15M target.

Can syndications really turn $300k into $7.5M in 30 years like an infinite BRRRR can?

Syndications typically return less than 10% yearly, which isn't much different from the S&P 500. 

300k would be just over $5m after 30 years compounded at 10%, if it even hits that. At 8% compounded it would only be $3m. 

Hopefully your kids are more deserving than Donald Trump. lol

Post: Is San Pedro The Next Highland Park?

Rachel S.Posted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 127
  • Votes 63
Originally posted by @Delbert Standifer:

@Rachel S.well put. To each it’s on but when automation takes over at the port San Pedro will get hit the hardest. However investors have a good 15 years to try and do something but trust me it’s coming I literally see it everyday.

We've already had this conversation and I still disagree with you. Not everyone in San Pedro is a longshoreman, LA has a lot of diversity in employment opportunities and San Pedro is commutable to a lot of places, even if your job doesn't allow you to telecommute. Plus, in recent years it has been much more difficult for casuals to get enough hours to ever get in. Going forward, younger generations are not going to see the port as the golden opportunity that they once did. If they're smart. 

The point about people/investors not coming here was past tense. They are watching the city now because of the larger planned development. I even noticed more traffic coming in just from Crafted and Brewery West. 

Toyota was a big employer in Torrance. Their packing up and leaving doesn't seem to have caused much death and destruction there.

Post: Is San Pedro The Next Highland Park?

Rachel S.Posted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 127
  • Votes 63
Originally posted by @Charles Cooper:

@Vu Thai

The port is determined to go green.

Have you actually noticed a lot of pollution living here? I haven't. I feel like a lot of it misses us and ends up in LB. My theory about the difference in price is that most people/potential investors didn't come here. It's not on the way to anywhere, so unless you know someone here, you would never just drive through. If you do get off the freeway, you are not exactly seeing the potential of the city unless you take the time to explore a little. Plus, some of the people are a little different. Very insulated and resistant to change. Born here, work at the port and die here. :-D

Post: I found a property to buy?

Rachel S.Posted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 127
  • Votes 63
Originally posted by @Bryan Danger:
Originally posted by @Rod Lambe:

Hi Lance,

All these RE investing guru's make it sound that as long as I am willing to work hard everything will turn out for a great financial future. After I have put down my money to join the pro program I emailed and ask for 5 minutes of advice. There support team sends me to a forum. Oh well, it great that I heard from you & Randy. You are right, I have learned I'm not alone and Randy gave some great advice. I am the type of guy that will differently do what ever it takes but it sounds like what it takes is MONEY. Hard work alone will not do it!

Well... sadly, that's what many "gurus" do - they tell you all the positives without all the realities.
That doesn't mean that you should run away, nor that whatever excited you about this to begin with isn't still valid/real... it might just mean that you need to lay some foundation first.

Hard work will get you there... but at this very first stage it may be that your initial work should be focused on getting some money in hand.  Spend a bit of time working, selling things, downsizing, cancelling the pro memberships... whatever it takes to gather that initial investment - and then you'll be in a better to place to make those appointment, place offers and allow that money to work for you and making your hard work even more valuable.

Anyone who tells you that this is "easy" or a "get rich quick" plan is probably just getting rich off of whatever they are selling you... but this IS worth the hard work and CAN lead to the great financial future you're trying to achieve.  

I feel like that's a lot of people on BP. Yeah, borrow money from anyone who will lend it to you. You have nothing saved at all... Sure it's a great idea for you to invest right away, just get an FHA loan, borrow from family etc, etc. It's like 2006 sub-prime loans, the investor edition.

Post: Home or rental property?

Rachel S.Posted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 127
  • Votes 63

Understood. I bought a SFR in the inland empire in 2011. I got it for a rock bottom price and it cash flows nicely. For my next investment I would like a small multifamily in LA. I will be looking in more transitional areas though with a much smaller budget. I wouldn't be comfortable carrying an almost 2 million dollar mortgage on a single property. That's too much risk for me personally. Unless it were a commercial multi-family with 4-5 units, because then you would need to be pretty unlucky for all your tenants to stop paying all at once. Everyone has different comfort levels though.

Post: Home or rental property?

Rachel S.Posted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 127
  • Votes 63
Originally posted by @Rudy Avila:

@Jon Schwartz I didnt mean it in a bad way ma boi lol its expensive out here in LA. Im in the same boat. But I dont count your principal paydown out of your monthly expenditure. To me your paying $4,112 a month to live in that property. To me your last month using your numbers your increase networth is $2,840. Hey its still good not saying its not, im not calculating my principal paydown in my cashflow. 

I bet you could still house hack a duplex in El Monte and come out ahead though. It's not one of LA's most swanky areas and the price will reflect that. I feel ok saying that, because I also live in a neighborhood that is somewhat lacking in swank. :-D

Post: Lots of free time, no funds

Rachel S.Posted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 127
  • Votes 63

I am going to be the odd wo(man) out on this thread...

How well positioned are you to go from a pretty well paying job to (potentially) next to nothing while you build up your real estate gig? I am guessing not particularly, as you state that you have no funds. Sorry to be a downer, but if I were you I would find another w2 gig as soon as you can and start saving. Do this on the side until it you become more established and you see the $$ coming in. Especially as I am thinking that income might be something tech related. Those career paths generally don't respond well to gaps in your resume, if you do need to go back.

Post: Should I buy a flip with squatters in it during COVID-19

Rachel S.Posted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 127
  • Votes 63
Originally posted by @Steven Jackson:

@Larkin Adey thanks. I think I will let this deal go unless they can turn the home over empty

Yes. I would run like you're on fire and someone is chasing you with gasoline.

Post: Los Angeles Real Estate Market Update

Rachel S.Posted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 127
  • Votes 63
Originally posted by @Dennis Maynard:
Originally posted by @Rachel S.:

I agree that we are not seeing the amount of homeowners with low levels of equity in their homes that we saw in 2008. It follows that the homeowners who have high equity, but a sudden inability to pay the mortgage each month would just sell. This all sounds logical to me and is what I would do in their position. However, not everyone thinks the way I do. It ignores the fact that many homeowners view their home from more of an emotional perspective (shame of not being able to afford their home, hanging on to the perceived security of "owning their residence" etc, etc) than a financial one. It's this perspective that causes owners to get so far into the pre-foreclosure process that they couldn't hope to turn things around even if they had a shift in mindset. Denial is a powerful thing. I am seeing this happening already when I look at the default amounts on the pre-foreclosures in my local market. Most have been in pre-foreclosure for many months. The fact that more owners will follow this path is purely speculative on my part and I may be way off base. For my own perspective there is nothing in the current market that makes me feel an urgency to invest. Quite the opposite, in fact. Fast forward to next year, I may look back and see that I was completely wrong. With that said I am pretty confident that, even if I am, the market conditions will not be such that I will feel I missed an opportunity. 

And this is why we are in business... The numbers still don't bear out massive foreclosures, even in LA. Apartments are a different deal... SFR, not yet... There are some parts of town you can by a SFR for cheaper than a condo. The deals are here.

That is true. You can definitely buy an SFR in my neighborhood for less than a condo in Beverly Hills.

Post: Los Angeles Real Estate Market Update

Rachel S.Posted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 127
  • Votes 63

I agree that we are not seeing the amount of homeowners with low levels of equity in their homes that we saw in 2008. It follows that the homeowners who have high equity, but a sudden inability to pay the mortgage each month would just sell. This all sounds logical to me and is what I would do in their position. However, not everyone thinks the way I do. It ignores the fact that many homeowners view their home from more of an emotional perspective (shame of not being able to afford their home, hanging on to the perceived security of "owning their residence" etc, etc) than a financial one. It's this perspective that causes owners to get so far into the pre-foreclosure process that they couldn't hope to turn things around even if they had a shift in mindset. Denial is a powerful thing. I am seeing this happening already when I look at the default amounts on the pre-foreclosures in my local market. Most have been in pre-foreclosure for many months. The fact that more owners will follow this path is purely speculative on my part and I may be way off base. For my own perspective there is nothing in the current market that makes me feel an urgency to invest. Quite the opposite, in fact. Fast forward to next year, I may look back and see that I was completely wrong. With that said I am pretty confident that, even if I am, the market conditions will not be such that I will feel I missed an opportunity.