@Jaysen Medhurst The numbers you listed seems to be very good. But could you please share an example in more details? Sorry I'm a bit slow in this. The last two rentals were our primary residents before that turn into rentals when we move to another property. So we've always been looking at buying a primary residents. I'm reading through the forum here trying to learn more but my knowledge have been very limited to our local area residential market. It's hard to imagine, buying a $2.4m property with $600k down (25%), means a $1.8m loan, so with PITI, I'm looking at about $10k per month on expenses. So to have $5k cash flow, I should then expect the rent would be $15k/month? What kind of property and area have that kind of potential? Sorry that in SF Bay Area, a $2.4m home is just an average 4 bedroom SFR home in a good school district, that can probably produce about $5k rent per month at max... You can tell how little I know about the world out there :(
@Jason Turgeon I'm glad all the hard work pay off. After seeing Shawn putting out the number for me, I'm now convince that I'm just sitting on a bunch of cash that could have so much more potential than just relying on the market appreciation. It's almost like keeping the money in a shoe box under my bed (not that I do that) than investing in a good stock/mutual funds. However, with young kids at home, it's hard for me to be managing rehab or any kind of non turn-key thing on my own that is out of state. My husband is not very keen on flying alone, and also I have more real estate knowledge than he does. I'm a licensed Realtor in CA for 16 years, but not doing this full time currently. So I'm doing most of the research, evaluation, process, etc... I guess when my kids are older and I have more experience in multi-family properties, I should be able to adventure into more challenging investments.
@Shawn Regnier wow, thanks for putting that into a clear formula for me to see. I always know the cash flow sucks, but didn't think of it that way. And the worst is that, we are actually sitting on more equity than what you estimate. We had put in 30% down to keep the loan amount conforming when we purchase it as our primary home 10 years ago. And we are now sitting at about $650k equity. Ouch! That's why if we are selling it to our tenants, it'll have to be 1031, there's no way I'm paying Uncle Sam anything now. The problem is nothing that I buy here in the SF Bay area will make sense in terms of cash flow. Need to research a lot more to find something out of area for the exchange...
@Tony Kim Thanks for sharing your story. The Bay Area is not really good at finding properties like that. The poorer neighborhood all have rent control and it's not the most ideal place to buy a rental property. Our townhouse was at an up and coming neighborhood and thus the appreciation was nice, but just as any homes in the Bay Area, things have gone up a lot the past few years, I don't know when it'll plateau, or it'll ever be. We have a lot of overseas money from China buying homes left and right, I'm sure it's the same situation in LA area as well. This is why most homes here doesn't make any rental sense... really have to look harder at other areas.