Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Nick S.

Nick S. has started 6 posts and replied 67 times.

Post: Why would people buy condos/SFH in Texas?

Nick S.Posted
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 69
  • Votes 41

@Bryan Tasumi A few things could be happening here: 

1) They bought on a mortgage when the prices were significantly less than $200k

2) They bought with all cash, so there is no mortgage payment

3) They used to live there and have moved and are holding on, possibly hoping for appreciation and living with no or negative cash flow


Remember there are 4 aspects of buy and hold investing to consider, and cash flow is only one of them: Appreciation, cash flow, mortgage paydown, and depreciation. After considering all 4 aspects of a buy and hold investment, sometimes it's still a net positive to hold a property even if the cash flow is low or negative. I'm not saying I would invest in one of those condos, but someone else might be doing OK with one of the 3 scenarios above. 

Post: Why would people buy condos/SFH in Texas?

Nick S.Posted
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 69
  • Votes 41

@Bryan Tasumi I agree with your analysis. You can rent near the medical center for cheaper than you can buy a condo, even after considering everything like opportunity cost of capital, appreciation, and loan pay down. If you want to live in the med center and still invest in real estate, it would make sense to rent close to where you want to live and then invest in cheaper properties that cash flow outside of the inner loop.

Post: Dissen Heights Houston

Nick S.Posted
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 69
  • Votes 41

If your goal is to build a new home and sell, then it really comes down to what you think the final sale price is, and then you work back from there to get the profit you want. 

Basically, you would calculate how much you can pay for the land by estimating the numbers below:

Final sale price - Build cost - demo cost - permits - holding costs - desired profit = “Lot value”

Now that would be the Lot Value to you. Someone else’s lot value might be higher or lower, depending on what they plan to do with the land. For example, a developer who is going to build 4 townhomes on that same lot can probably pay more for it and still make a profit.

Figure out how much you can spend and offer that much. You can use your estimates to justify the offer price. If they take it, great. If not then it’s not a good investment for your chosen strategy

Post: 3/2.5 SFR in Houston Texas - Deal Analysis

Nick S.Posted
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 69
  • Votes 41

Do you include all of the items below in your 40% expense estimate? 

  • Property tax
  • Insurance
  • HOA fee
  • Vacancy
  • Maintenance/repairs
  • Property management (I assume = $0, since you self manage)
  • CapEx (different than maintenance/repairs)

I find it better to break down each item individually instead of using a % as a rule of thumb. When I plug your numbers in, depending on what I assume for some of the line items above, this deal is right on the brink of cash flow positive and negative. So COCR ~ 0%.

I guess if you only plan to hold it for a few years and you don't set aside any money for CapEx the numbers could look more appealing. Really depends on your risk tolerance!

Post: Just Closed on my First Investment Property

Nick S.Posted
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 69
  • Votes 41
Originally posted by @Collin Garbarino:

A few people asked how I found and financed the house. (Even though we're in the Houston area, it's not a flood house.) I might write up a longer post about the deal later, but this deal was a bit of a unicorn.

I started thinking about real estate investing at the end of 2016. I began reading books and listening to the BiggerPockets podcast. I started piling up cash for a down payment.

Since I had real estate on my mind, I started talking about it with people. One of the people who knew I was looking for a property was a neighbor. One day, out of the blue, he approached me and told me that he was planning to retire and move to Florida. He offered to sell me his house.

Because he liked me and my family, he offered the house to us at such a low price we were able to pay cash for it. It's going to need some work, but I've already got so much equity into it on day one, that BRRRRing the property will be easy. I expect to end up with $500 of cashflow with no money into it.

In one sense, this crazy-good deal fell into our laps. But really, if I hadn't been learning about real estate, talking about real estate, and saving up to buy real estate, there wouldn't have been a deal.

The moral of the story: Let people know that you're looking for a deal. You never know who might have one for you.

Congrats! What an exciting deal. $500/month cashflow with no cash in the deal will make doing the next one(s) even that much easier

In looking through the HCAD records for Harris County, I'm trying to figure out what to make of the code that seems to go by many names. In one place, it's called "State class code", in another place it's called "State category code" and in yet another it's called "State category ID". These are the codes such as "A1 - Real, Residential, Single-Family", or "B1 - Real, Residential, Multi-Family".

Are these codes just a reflection of how the property is being used? 

For example, if a property is categorized as "B2 - Real, Residential, Two-Family" and you wanted to add a third unit on the property, what's the process? I know you would have to operate within any deed restrictions but other than that, how would you change to "B3 - Real, Residential, Three-Family"?

Another question is "B1 - Real, Residential, Multi-Family" seems similar or overlapping with "B4 - Real, Residential, Four- or More-Family". I googled around but didn't find a good resource that further explains these categories and what exactly they mean and how they are used.

Thanks @Elias Camhi, this is some good data! Just curious, you said the average time based on your data set is 2.4 years. Did you also calculate the median? Is your data only SFR's or is it a mix of SFR's and apartment units?

@Account Closed Your numbers are very much in line with what I've come up with for my assessment of the state of the market in the Houston suburbs. 

And I tend to agree that your capex allowance may be a bit low. I recently made a thread on that very topic. 

Are we both being too conservative? Maybe. But I don't want my first deal to be something I lose money on continuously. 

Post: CapEx and Property Management - higher than expected

Nick S.Posted
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 69
  • Votes 41

@Cody L. I agree! My goal is to understand all of the costs and benefits in as much detail as possible to assess deals. Another thing to consider is taxes and depreciation. 

Post: CapEx and Property Management - higher than expected

Nick S.Posted
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 69
  • Votes 41
Originally posted by @Matt R.:
Originally posted by @Nick S.:

As I continue to analyze deals while I look to buy my first rental property, I've recently come to the realization that my initial cost estimates were probably on the low side. Just today, I think I've convinced myself that my previous assumptions for CapEx and Property Management were previously too low (I was assuming ~7% of rents for CapEx and ~10% of rents for property management).

As far as CapEx goes, I was previously just using 7% of rents because it seemed like a "good enough" number. But after some more research and reading, it seems like 10% or more is more realistic in the longterm. Brandon Turner put together a nice table with data to back this up in this article: https://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2015/10/1...

As far as property management goes, I was assuming 10% of rents because that's what I've always heard as a rule of thumb. However, in Houston, I didn't realize that most management companies will ALSO charge 1 months rent to get the unit leased. 1 month of rent in a year is 8.3%, so that comes out to be 18.3% of gross rents go toward property management every month? Sheesh!

Once I start assuming these costs, coupled with high property tax in Houston, it's looking like I'm going to have to search for an even better deal in an area that has very strong rents in order to get a decent return on investment. Something like purchase price + rehab = $110k and rent for $1500/month to get $100/month of positive cash flow with a 20% down payment. Not too many of those deals out there right now, it seems.

I'd appreciate some feedback on these numbers to see if I'm on the right track -- do my numbers sound about right?

 Well you just figured out two big BP perpuated investment myths, so hats off. First, percentage of rent is not related to capex uniformly. This notion I am not sure where it originated but it is so business bassackwards it is amazing. Second, PMs have a base 8-12% they charge and that some folks even state this final number to sell others investments, leaving out the real known PM percentage cost to the investors. The actual national average PMs charge after standard lease up fees and the rest is 14% and that is if everything goes near perfect. To this day BP sellers will sell you on it is 10%. Don't be fooled!

Good for catching this as most seem to not be aware of these bogus marketed myths. 

Yeah I understand that CapEx isn't really related to rents, but it can be very crudely approximated as such for a given market. You probably aren't going to be replacing the flooring in a $1000/month apartment with the same stuff you would put in a $1500/month place. But things like roofs and water heaters are going to be pretty even across the board. Would definitely be better to assume a capex number based on 1) sq footage and 2) level of finishes.

I think I'll update my cost estimating spreadsheet to do just that