Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago,

Account Closed
  • Houston, TX
20
Votes |
37
Posts

Check my buy-and-hold rental assumptions for Houston, Texas

Account Closed
  • Houston, TX
Posted

Hi all,

I'm interested in acquiring a small (~10) portfolio of SFH rentals to supplement my income in ~15-20 years. As I play around with my numbers, and especially as I look at how property taxes work here in Houston, I've been questioning if a long term buy and hold strategy works very well here. I've probably been playing around with spreadsheets too much, so I'm taking a step back and hoping some more experienced folks can check my reasoning and assumptions.

First, my assumptions - by my numbers, the profit margin here in Texas is more like 40% (i.e. 60% expenses instead of 50% that everyone quotes as a rule of thumb).  I'd love to hear other people's thoughts on this.  A typical example of my assumptions in a decent B suburb:

- $130k retail value

- $1350 market rent, netting $1285/mo gross revenue after accounting for $65/mo (5%) physical vacancy

- $300/mo property taxes (2.8% annually on assessed value.  I know it will probably be lower initially based on an off-market purchase price, but I'd imagine the appraisal district will aggressively increase the assessment to market value within a few years).

- $110/mo (8%) PM

- $70/mo insurance (just hazard, no flood ins)

- $75/mo turnover allowance (1 month rent to PM to place new tenant every 2 years plus $500 every 2 years to get the place cleaned up for new tenants)

- $75/mo maintenance allowance

- $75/mo capital allowance ($900/yr, or $27k in today's money over a 30 year span)

- $50/mo misc (usually like a $25/mo HOA for the subdivision, plus accounting for other misc things like lawn maintenance when the place is vacant).

Total:

- Gross Revenue: ~$15,400/yr

- Average Expenses: ~$8,800/yr (57%)

- NOI: ~$6,600/yr

The off-market price for this sort of house that I'm seeing from wholesalers is maybe 110k purchase + rehab cost if you're super lucky, which after a 75% LTV debt service at 5%, is pretty much within noise of no cash return, and yet these deals are getting snatched up immediately. Yes I know there's the tenant paying down your debt, but the return on that in the early years is around 4%, so that's not terribly compelling to me.

Am I missing something here? I'm really interested if I'm being overly conservative relative to a lot of folks' assumptions, but at the same time, I question if $27k capex is really enough over a 30 year span, and I'm not really accounting for the rare evictions, etc. I see lots of posts that people won't accept less than 10% CoC deals, but I'm not sure if that's because they are getting deals for so much less or that the assumptions on expenses are different.

Thanks!

Loading replies...