Quote from @James Hamling:
@Nick Grewe seems like #1 is learning the industry, because your mixing up being a construction co. with being a GC, two VERY different things.
Being a Construction Co. is all about the work you do. Being a G.C. is all about the work you MANAGE.
A G.C. is the "Ring Master", not the performer. They have the ability to build a well rounded stable of "performers" and to organize them into a manner that put's together a concise, efficient production that achieves an end for the client.
There is a common delusion that a person get's good at being a tradesman that they will just be good at being a Foreman, and it's not always the case. Or a good foreman too being a Construction Co. owner, or good Construction Co. owner too G.C.. All these are key people but all different, doing different things, specializing differently.
For myself, most important to being a good G.C. is actually being a G.C., just start there, not being a tradesman who think's there a G.C. because they got a license, a license only means you have permission to try, not that you are anything.
You're completely right. I do understand that being a general contractor and a general construction company is different. As I mentioned, I want to learn a lot of the processes of the trades I am hiring out. Until I have some more exposure to my field, I will most likely have to do some of the small work myself. I want to make sure I have my methods, scheduling, financing and papers all figured out before I start sending other people out to work under my company name. It would give me piece of mind knowing that if one of those subs decided to not show up, that I can fill the need if absolutely necessary. Also, I feel as I understand what it's like to do the work, I will understand what the subs should be doing, approximately what things would cost, how long it could take, and what everything should look like in the end. I dont want to hand a sub par job off to my client.