Originally posted by @Aaron Barber:
I was wanting to stay local so I could manage the properties myself but I dont mind investing out of state.
Aaron, I want to offer a counterpoint to your statement here. Many new investors (myself included) get stuck in this mindset that they have to invest locally so that they can manage their own rentals to save the management fee. This can be extremely counterproductive. First of all, do you enjoy managing properties? Are you extremely good at it? Is the time spent managing your rental worth more than $100/month? For most investors, we do not enjoy being property managers. It is usually much more productive to pay a good property manager and spend that extra time doing what investors enjoy and are good at; finding the next deal and building relationships.
The second reason this is counterproductive reasoning, is that it forces you to stay in your local market, which may or may not be conducive to your goals. It sounds like your goal is cash flow. You aren't going to find much cash flow West of Missouri/Oklahoma. By freeing yourself from the mindset that you must self-manage, you open the doors to better markets that will better serve you in accomplishing your goals. There are markets where you will have better cash flow after paying for a property manager. Think about this. You can free yourself and your time from the burden of collecting rent, evictions, clogged toilets, etc and still have more cash flow if you allow yourself to think outside the box.