I agree with the idea proposed by @Bryan Hancock . I've been thinking for a while about creating a website for my local area that would organize (and publish) the local investor "supply and demand". In other words, it would be a virtual swap-meet where everyone that's involved with anything to do with the local real estate investing industry could post their "wares". I imagine it to look like kind of like a spreadsheet with a wholesaler's column, buyer's column, lender's column, contractors column, etc. that shows exactly what each person has to offer and exactly what they need (supply and demand). Not only would that provide a way to make direct contact with people you want/need to talk to but it would also reveal where the gaps were in the local market. If there's a ton of buyers and very few wholesalers, then people could divert some of their attention to wholesaling (find a need - fill a need) and vice-versa. It would paint a clear picture of the local market that would help everyone make better decisions. I think this could be done on a much larger scale inside BP.....perhaps an extension of the current Marketplace.
I work a full-time engineering job and flip an average of one house every two months (hope to be up to two houses/month next year).........and have a family that I like to spend time with......... so believe me when I tell you that time is very valuable to me! One of the reasons I haven't participated in local reia groups very much is because they're so disorganized and inefficient. I understand that person to person networking is important but it also takes a tremendous amount of time. That's why I'm systematizing everything in my business. I want it to run that way but I also don't have a choice because I have so little time. I think a website like this would really improve my efficiency.....and build a stronger local market.
@Michael Quarles ,I generally hate to voice my disagreement with people's ideas but when the outcome of a discussion will impact my life (or business), I feel the need to speak up. Following your bullets.....
1) I don't see a reason to raise the price/cost for the Pro account. If $14/month works with @Joshua Dorkin , then let it be. How would raising the price improve things for the group???
2) I don't think there should be a minimum number of posts required for anyone. I think the result would be the temptation for people to start posting a lot of very short, worthless (spam) posts just to keep their account in good standing which would really water-down the value of the content.
3) Most replies that people post are done with tact and a true desire to help but I've seen several posts lately that were just degrading and served no purpose other than to make someone look stupid. What's the purpose of giving a thumbs-down vote? It's really easy to just ignore something you don't like so I don't see a reason to publish how much you dislike what someone's saying. Part of the glue that holds this kind of community together is that it's a non-threatening environment.
4) A shopping cart to draw funds from Pro members?!? Are you a stake-holder in BP? .....Josh owes you money and you're trying to collect, right? I'm kidding.....sort-of. I support BP because it brings value to me but I would like to pay as little as possible to do that. I think Josh's purpose for this thread was to find ways to make the Pro area better for everyone, not to brainstorm ideas to further monetize the site. I'll support a reduction of the cost..... :)
Michael, It's not my intention to offend you so please take my comments a purely opinion. I have nothing against you and hope your business thrives.