Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Monica Boyles

Monica Boyles has started 4 posts and replied 9 times.

Hi all. I've been looking at properties going to auction. Typically it's the lender of the first mortgage that is foreclosing. But occasionally I'll see a property where the it's the lender related to a second mortgage (or even an HOA) that is foreclosing.

My understanding is that (here in CA at least) if you buy a property at auction and it's the lender of the first mortgage foreclosing, a second mortgage is wiped and you won't owe that. (There might be other property liens that remain of course.)

It's also my understanding that if the lender of a second mortgage is foreclosing and you buy the property, you'll still be responsible for the first mortgage. My question is whether you can assume this mortgage under the same terms (or potentially new terms), or whether that 1st mortgage is going to have to be paid in full ASAP. Please let me know if you have any insight.

Quote from @Marshall Leipprandt:

@Monica Boyles Out of curiosity, what is your logic behind saying that buying in CA doesn't make sense? Are you talking in regards to finding a cash-flowing property or a property with high appreciation potential? What are your goals and what's your current cost of living? Do you plan to stay in your current career for many years? How long do you plan to stay in CA?

I think a lot of people discount buying in CA when in reality, it could make sense if you found a duplex or something similar in a solid area and owner-occupied while renting out the other unit. You will not cash-flow on a duplex if you owner-occupy it, but if your current cost of living is lets say $4K/mo and your all-in cost of ownership of a duplex in SF after a 5-10% down payment is $8K and you can rent one side of the duplex for $4K, then your cost of living has not gone up yet you are now able to access the appreciation of the asset, gain equity in the property via principal pay-down, and gain the tax advantages of owning real estate. This is obviously a simplified example, but that is the general logic I use to make this analysis.

If you are fully sold on out-of-state markets, I agree with @Jonathan Taylor from above. A lot of affordable out-of-state markets are the "siren song" calling to CA investors. Certainly a lot to think through when looking at new markets, but I would start with an area that you are either familiar with, enjoy visiting, or have family/friends. Having at least some connection to the area helps you leverage that knowledge and the network in that area to find a trustworthy team. Plus its always great to have someone you know and can actually trust to drive by on occasion and report back to you.

Hi Marshall - I think buying in the Bay Area proper isn't a fit for me as I don't plan to owner-occupy - no plans to move for the time being. Otherwise, your approach could make sense. I do think that Bay-Area-adjacent could work if I can find the right investment. I do like the idea of staying local-ish if I can. Thanks for your suggestions.

Quote from @Ari Stern:

@Monica Boyles, all of the advice on here is solid. Rather than repeating what has already been said, I will stress something that I feel was only lightly touched upon - property management. 

I see this more often than I'd like, where new investors will buy a property solely based on how it underwrites. If the numbers look good on an excel spreadsheet they jump all over it. Yet they don't put too much focus on the actual management side of it, and end up cutting corners, or engaging a third-rate management company. And sure enough, the investment ends up being a disaster.  

Since this is out of state, and you're not likely to self-manage the property, I'd highly suggest putting a lot of your effort into identifying a solid local management company. One of the important things to pay attention to, since you are looking for a small property, is your building's proximity to other properties that the management company is managing. A big mistake a lot of investor make, especially when when it comes to small properties, is that they rely solely on the reviews, feedback and reputation on the company, and disregard how far away the company is from their property. Since you're likely to pay the management company a percentage of income, the management company doesn't end up making all that much on smaller properties, and they tend to not want to inconvenience themselves and deal with issues as they arise, and in a timely manner, if it means traveling a half hour away each time. As apposed to a management company that is already managing a portfolio of properties within a few block from you, and can hop over at any time. As a side note, especially with smaller properties, another thing to pay attention to, is some companies also tend to play games on the accounting and expense side, to prop up how much they make from the property. So definitely do your research on this.

Good luck!


 Great advice - thank you Ari.

Quote from @Stephanie P.:
Quote from @Monica Boyles:

Hi all - looking to buy my first 2-4 unit multifamily (or possibly STR). I live in the San Francisco Bay Area, so buying locally doesn't make sense. I've been looking at more remote but still desirable parts of California, but obviously CA is just expensive in general. Even though I am aiming to put 30-40% down, it seems like it will be challenging to get rents to cover a loan and basic monthly expenses. Would love any guidance on buying out of state -- from best markets to consider, to techniques for research, how not to get burned, is it OK to purchase sight unseen or would you always recommend viewing in person, etc. I'm sure this topic has been covered before, so please feel free to point me to existing guidance if there is some. Many thanks in advance.


 Hey Monica

I'll name a few markets for you.  Kansas City, MO, Pittsburgh, PA, Tyler, Texas, Louisville KY.  We've closed loans in all four cities and the cash flow was great, the values were reasonable and the rents were great.  

Stay away from the coasts.  The values are way too high to sustain decent cash flow.

Pm me if you need some referrals of good Realtors or Property Managers in the area.

Good luck on your journey,

Stephanie


Thanks Stephanie -- funny, I was looking at Pittsburgh properties last night, since I lived there (years ago) and know the city a bit.

Quote from @Carlos Ptriawan:
Quote from @Monica Boyles:

Hi there - I'm considering buying a STR out of state (I live in the SF Bay Area, so costs are pretty outrageous here). I'd love any advice on identifying and vetting properties from afar. I'm also curious if anyone has worked with Awning to purchase a STR...some of their listings do look quite good. Many thanks!


 My recipe :

- only purchase STR at the resort destination only so you have no problem with permits etc etc
- purchase with min. 50% down
- have the STR PM in place before you even bid (very important)
- do intel on your competition for actual cash flows.

 @Carlos Ptriawan - thanks for the advice - what's the logic for 50% down? And are you able to explain the importance of having PM in place before bidding?

Hi there - I'm considering buying a STR out of state (I live in the SF Bay Area, so costs are pretty outrageous here). I'd love any advice on identifying and vetting properties from afar. I'm also curious if anyone has worked with Awning to purchase a STR...some of their listings do look quite good. Many thanks!

Hi all - looking to buy my first 2-4 unit multifamily (or possibly STR). I live in the San Francisco Bay Area, so buying locally doesn't make sense. I've been looking at more remote but still desirable parts of California, but obviously CA is just expensive in general. Even though I am aiming to put 30-40% down, it seems like it will be challenging to get rents to cover a loan and basic monthly expenses. Would love any guidance on buying out of state -- from best markets to consider, to techniques for research, how not to get burned, is it OK to purchase sight unseen or would you always recommend viewing in person, etc. I'm sure this topic has been covered before, so please feel free to point me to existing guidance if there is some. Many thanks in advance.

Post: Best Site for Foreclosures?

Monica BoylesPosted
  • Posts 9
  • Votes 5

Thanks David! Any experience with PropertyShark?

Post: Best Site for Foreclosures?

Monica BoylesPosted
  • Posts 9
  • Votes 5

Hi - I've been using RealtyTrac to identify foreclosure properties, but they've just redesigned their site and I can no longer access the my "saved properties" that I spent hours researching. Looking for a good alternative - anyone have any suggestions? Many thanks in advance.