Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Mike Miller

Mike Miller has started 19 posts and replied 50 times.

Hmm. So you think there's some states that will completely hide your leela name from public view if you use an LLC? This is what California's DRE website looks like. Seems to show their real name, and then there's a DBA section

I know many people use a DBA/LLC name as an agent, I like the idea for privacy.

However, what if someone looked up my license number on the state Real Estate website, like California Bureau of Real Estate, will it display my real legal name to the public? Will it still show my legal name and indicate that I am using a DBA name?

If a client of mine knows me by my DBA name "Joe Larry", and could look up my License # and see my real name is "Billy Bob". Simply curious to what extent a LLC name anonymizes a real estate agent.

Thanks

Interesting, the responses vary from everyone. Well at least it's not just me!

I got the form from here on Bigger Pockets, under the FilePlace: https://www.biggerpockets.com/files/user/ventekrea...
It's on the front page of the file section, been downloaded a lot. 

Yeah I was thinking the extra lines may be what @Chris K. said, entity type. But that would only explain box 1 and 2. Line 3 can not be for address, as there's already an address line after that. It also can not be for 3 different names, why would the middle line be so short? 

Eh, strange. So many possibilities. 

Oh okay, I was thinking that one of the boxes may be to designate what I am, like  "Company" "individual" "corporation". Got it.

But now if I am wanting to buy it under an LLC, would I put the LLC name in line #1 and leave #2 and #3 blank?

Thanks

If am the buyer and my name is Joe Patterson, I assume that goes on  line #1, .....but then what is #2 and #3 for? (See screenshot.)

Originally posted by @Account Closed:

@Mike Miller For the seller to take, you serious the realtor might ask for a bank statement to make sure the buyer is not wasting the seller's time.

True. But if all the seller has to do is sign a contract that is already written up, and POF would be required later on to proceed, I would think they would be willing to do it from a preliminary standpoint.

But still don't know what contract or form would be used? How does one structure this?

An agent brought me an off-market property. I'd say it's a 60% chance the seller is not serious. So I don't want to unnecessarily introduce my investor to this agent unless it's serious. 

I can't do a generic wholesale contract, since it's not seller-buyer direct, there's an agent. And the new California Association of Realtors form does not allow assignees. 

So that said, how can I get some type of preliminary contract to ensure the seller is fairly serious? I am not looking to execute anything yet or go into escrow. Just want to make sure they are willing to take a $800K all-cash offer, before I bring it to my investor. Would I ask the agent to submit a normal C.A.R. purchase agreement form to the seller for $800K and use an LLC name as the buyer name? Not sure...

@Jay Hinrichs, I completely concur with you regarding wholesalers. With this scenario however,  I don't believe wholesaling was actually ever mentioned. I believe the investor had arranged to buy it directly and pay the "wholesaler" a chunky finders fee. No selling or exchanging of contracts. 

@Paul Bowers This was a vacant house, the seller had already moved out.

At the end of the day, it was just a bad agent. It was vacant, there was no wholesaling, the agent was familiar with the investor, etc. It's just one of those deals you have to walk away from and not squander your time on.

Well bit of a side discussion..... however, there's a number of factors you'd have to be filled in on. 

This wholesaler actually had a serious investor (it's a company) with the funds and was already interested in the property. The wholesaler disclosed to the agent who the investor was and verified his relationship with him. The agent was actually familiar with the investor because his firm does a lot of flips in the area. 

The investor did not want to provide his bank statements until he had a basic walk through. He felt the agent wasn't serious if he was unwilling to provide a basic walkthrough. So yes, you could say the investor is being a bit stubborn himself for not just emailing it over. Bottom line; the agent knew this investor was the real deal, and was unnecessarily being difficult. But there's certainly fault on both sides you could say. 

Hence, that's how this whole thing came about. The wholesaler and I were discussing how he could approach a situation like that down the road, where you have a serious investor ready, but you're dealing with a difficult agent that wants POF. If this was a multi-million dollar finished home, I totally understand demanding POF prior, but this was a cheap fixer upper that was going to have public open houses next month.

Originally posted by @Kenneth Garrett:

I agree with everyone. POF is sufficient. I'm not showing him my bank account. Find another agent. We need another site to rant/vent. Don't want to get scolded either.

Well it is the owner's agent, so there is no choice, the only way to get access is to deal with him.