Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Mike Miller

Mike Miller has started 19 posts and replied 49 times.

I was curious if any REALTORS here have personally received an offer from another license agent, that was not on a Reatlor form? I understand First Tuesday provides a free popular purchase agreement form that many non-realtor agents often use.

Did you take it and copy it over to a REATLOR form for your client? Or how did you personally handle it?

Post: Any Cloud Brokerages that Do Not Require You to Join a MLS?

Mike MillerPosted
  • Oakland, CA
  • Posts 50
  • Votes 4

Thanks guys! This has given me a lot to think about. To try to reply to everyone's post:

-How I find my properties without the MLS: I have been finding my properties for the past 4 years without EVER using an agent or MLS. Lots of methods and resources. It's always been off-market too.

-Obtaining disclosures/reports: I have never had trouble getting copies of disclosures and inspections, agents/sellers will just send it to me when I ask.

-What Form would I use without being a NAR member: That is a good point, I suppose I could join NAR, and just not the MLS. The MLS is the larger cost of the two that I truly don't need.

-Hanging my license as a referral agent: But then I can not write my own offers, only refer. But as Daniel Y mentioned, I could just ask someone to represent me and request a referral fee. At least get something extra from it. Perhaps I will go that route.

One of the reasons I wanted to get my license is that some of the properties I find off-market  have an agent representing the seller. They almost always refuse to accept any offer form other than the Association of Realtor forms.
I once had to scramble to find an agent to represent me on a time sensitive deal, but the agent demanded to view the property herself first before writing my offer. I then went to find another agent, but by that time, the seller accepted another offer. If I had a license, I could have done it myself and moved much quicker. I also could take 2.5% from the transaction. 

Post: Any Cloud Brokerages that Do Not Require You to Join a MLS?

Mike MillerPosted
  • Oakland, CA
  • Posts 50
  • Votes 4
Originally posted by @Cara Lonsdale:

Having access to the MLS and your lockbox key will allow you to search for properties in real time and gain access/entry when you want to view. Don't you find that of value when working as your own Realtor?

Also, having the ability to write offers, e-sign them and put together offer packages with all the forms you need....isn't that a value?

Sure, you are going to be getting/saving the Realtor commision, but in order to do that, you need to spend the investment into the Real Estate supplies that get you there.

Thanks, I am certainly aware of the MLS benefits and agree. But I'm only curious about Brokerages that Do Not Require you to Join a MLS.

Post: Any Cloud Brokerages that Do Not Require You to Join a MLS?

Mike MillerPosted
  • Oakland, CA
  • Posts 50
  • Votes 4

I got my license to write my own offers on my own rental properties I buy. I have no intention to represent sellers or buyers, or ever list a property. No need for the MLS.

Including the cloud brokers like REAL and EXP Realty- all the brokerages I've researched so far require to join a local MLS & NAR. As a company policy, not law. My local MLS comes out to $966 per year! It bundles CAR membership. I have no need.

Any brokerages you know of that don't require MLS membership?

Originally posted by @James Wise:
Originally posted by @Mike Miller:

Say you interviewed two real estate agents that you we're considering to list your home with. You met them at THEIR OFFICE, they did not come over to your house. The agent does know your address though.

You have not signed or decided with either agent yet. One of the agents you interviewed then told outside parties about it, perhaps their friend or fellow agents in the office.

A couple days later, several neighbors are now aware of your intentions to sell, asking you about it, and other agents start approaching you saying they heard you are selling soon. 

Is that legal for agents to disclose their awareness of it with others like that? Or just not moral/ethical? 

 Sounds like the agent is out there hustling. The agent doesn't even have a commitment from you & they are already out there getting the word out about your property. I think you are barking up the wrong tree. I think you should be calling that agent & putting their hustle to work for you.

 Well of course they're out there hustling, they want a commission. But that's besides the point. In this event, it was my inlaws home, they decided to transfer the house to their son, (my brother in law), through Prop 58. So there was no reassessment tax. 

So it's no longer going to be sold anyways, but neighbors and agents are still approaching them. Just was curious on the morality or legality of it. I thought such discussions would be confidential regardless of signing a listing agreement. Guess not

Say you interviewed two real estate agents that you we're considering to list your home with. You met them at THEIR OFFICE, they did not come over to your house. The agent does know your address though.

You have not signed or decided with either agent yet. One of the agents you interviewed then told outside parties about it, perhaps their friend or fellow agents in the office.

A couple days later, several neighbors are now aware of your intentions to sell, asking you about it, and other agents start approaching you saying they heard you are selling soon. 

Is that legal for agents to disclose their awareness of it with others like that? Or just not moral/ethical? 

Originally posted by @Max Gradowitz:

From what I understand, the CBRE (used to be called the DRE) keeps records of all licenses carried by all persons.  Persons carry these licenses, not business entities.  If you do something that warrants taking your license, they want to be able to take YOUR license, not a business entity's license.  That way you don't just open up a new entity each time CBRE shuts you down for unethical practice.  Even large brokerages have to have individual persons designated as the practicing brokers.

This is really important if you think about it. If YOU were screwed over by an unscrupulous Realtor, you'd want to be able to easily identify the person (not some random LLC!) so you could notify CBRE and have that PERSON (not some LLC) have their license at stake or otherwise sanctioned, right?

So... to answer your question about anonymity with CBRE: no.  Or as they say on the east coast "FUGET ABOUT IT"!

Well you would still be easily identifiable. The LLC name is unique by law. So if someone wanted to report me, they could just go by my LLC name and the DRE could look it up to match it to me. You would not need my legal name to report me.

It's like LLC's, the actual Secretary of State's office has your real info, they can pull it any time. It's just not viewable to the public.

Basically all I am trying to say in a nutshell, is I was hoping that the DRE allowed agents to use a unique DBA name, and hide their legal name from the public. But clearly that is not how the DRE is set up. Legal name will be displayed online to the public no matter what. Got it.

^ Of course, no doubt. I'm only wondering about this specific scenario though. How DBA/LLC name's function with public visibility through DRE


Originally posted by @Toi H.:

Yes, if someone looks up your California license number it will show your real name and mailing address. Also, if you have an LLC/Corp in California, it is very easy to look up information. Simply go to: sos.ca.gov, click on Business name search/look up and type in the name of the LLC, Corporation name or individual names. You will see the registration docs, signatures, addresses and the names of the mangers or registrants.

You can do the multiple LLC's, put your LLC into a corporation or get one in another state like mentioned above. However, I would recommend not using your home address or home phone number for anything that may have the potential to be public, like a state license or LLC. Get a mailing address and VoIP line to give yourself a little privacy.

LLC's are easy to mask though, because you can use an attorney or LegalZoom as your contact agent, and PO Boxes, so when people look it up, your name and info is not on any of the registration documents. The real ownership names are within the private documents that only they have and the state.

But as far as being a real estate agent and registering with the DRE, that's what I'm trying to figure out. Can we register under a DBA name and not reveal our legal name publicly. I know the DRE themselves would know my real legal name of course, but just publicly is what Im trying to figure.

Hmm. So you think there's some states that will completely hide your leela name from public view if you use an LLC? This is what California's DRE website looks like. Seems to show their real name, and then there's a DBA section