regarding the warranty deed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srTDquLh4e8
For the lease, if you want to use the LLC owning the property directly, then yes, it would be named on the lease. You won't own the property anymore, then you should not receive anything in your name as you would pierce the veil of your company and lose its liability protection shield. Be careful of the way the money flows. Why should you receive money from something that has nothing related to you? You are only a beneficiary of the LLC. Then you can only receive money from the LLC. The LLC owns the property. Then rents should go to the LLC. Keep separate bank accounts and do not skip a step.
The setup I am using with my rental real estate is a little bit more complex and is more geared towards FL issue with single member LLC weaknesses:
All my rental properties are held in their own FL LLC (through land trusts also, but for other reasons), all these LLCs are owned by a WY holding LLC.
I also have a FL C corp that is my operating entity. This C corp has a contract with each LLC as the property manager.
The FL landlord/tenant act specifies that the lease agreement should have the name of the landlord. The definition of the landlord is owner or lessor. So I can put my C Corp on the lease. My C Corp collect the rents, pays for all the repairs, bill, taxes, takes a management fee and pays the rest to the LLC.
My C corp is used to write off most of the expenses and also to give me fringe benefits like health care and to contribute to retirement plans. It may also help separating the liability between operation/ownership, but it is probable that everyone will be named in a lawsuit anyway. It adds to the complexity and requires another tax return and filing fee, but I believe that the cost benefit is worth it. It would probably be overkill for only one property, but if your portfolio starts growing it may be an option to consider.
You will find many contradicting opinions in this forum regarding the use of LLC. If you are disorganized, have trouble keeping proper records or don't want to deal with the complexity, then an LLC is not for you and using umbrella policy is a must for you.
In my case, I believe that I am borderline OCD and I love the intricate minutiae of having a very organized structure. I am also a DIY person and I had fun studying and researching all these areas. I drafted my structure, got some legal and tax advice feedback from attorney and CPA and set it up mostly myself. I spent some money on lawyers, books, training. Knowing what I know now, I could have probably saved some money in the process by avoiding some of my early mistakes, but the learning was welcome too. Regarding the yearly maintenance cost, it is not negligible, but I take it as another kind of assurance that make me sleep better.
Even with having this asset protection structure in place, I do have an umbrella insurance to protect myself from outside liability. I don't understand why some people are believing that you should have an umbrella policy or an LLC. They are two different tools that have two different goals. They can both protect you, but not in the same way nor from the same kind of threats. Your cost/risk assessment can make you choose one or the other, none or both. But it is always coming down to what you are willing to risk and leave unprotected.