Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Mike B.

Mike B. has started 8 posts and replied 377 times.

Post: Inherited tenant from hell

Mike B.Posted
  • Developer
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 428
  • Votes 349

@Samantha P. not sure what can be done after the fact. I just know that they are very strict in regards to security deposits being placed in an interest bearing account. If you're off by just pennies in the way of interest, they can hit you with several thousand dollars in fines. It may not be too late to clean up the paperwork and get in front of it but I'd recommend that you speak to a lawyer in regards to that process. If you need a referral, I can PM you my lawyer's number for you to speak direct. 

Post: Why is Rent still due during COVID-19?

Mike B.Posted
  • Developer
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 428
  • Votes 349

This thread reminds me of that scene in Mr Deeds...

-What did you want to be when you were a child?

-A veterinarian

-What do you do now, sir?

-I own a chain of slaughterhouses 

Post: Inherited tenant from hell

Mike B.Posted
  • Developer
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 428
  • Votes 349

The security deposit part of the story may end up being a bigger problem than you're realizing right now. Even if I'm taking over a building with perfect tenants, I require that the previous owner return the security deposit direct. If your tenant demands their security deposit back, a letter from the previous owner stating that "she used it up", will not suffice...and there will be some big time fines associated with that.

With that being said, I would ride out this virus before making any changes. Late rent is better than no rent for the foreseeable future.

Post: Is investing in Chicago brilliant or ridiculous...go!

Mike B.Posted
  • Developer
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 428
  • Votes 349
Originally posted by @Tom O.:
Originally posted by @Mike B.:

You are not getting an eviction done in Chicago in 2-3 months. I'd love to be proven wrong on this, but I have one hundred American dollars and a cup of coffee that says that your lawyer buddy can't produce an example.

Um, yeah this is all that my attorney friend does so you're gonna lose that bet. 

Now, of course it depends on how you define the terms, and what happens and what time of year and all sorts of other factors. 

The first trick of course is to AVOID eviction with cash for keys. 

The second trick is to file and work out a settlement that gets the tenant out without having to wait for the final order and sheriff to serve. A skilled eviction lawyer like my buddy can get someone out in 2-3 months using eviction. That's the bottom line. Remember: it's in the tenant's interest to NOT have an eviction order on their record so it's worth their while to negotiate once the thing is filed AND if you work it out you can agree to seal the file so there's no record of it against the tenant. 

But I do love how you armchair attorneys know more than the litigation attorneys. 


Yeah, but you said your "lawyer buddy can get an eviction in two to three months"...the two things you described aren't evictions. Your original statement made it sound like he can go through the entire eviction court process and have it settled in 2-3 months. Maybe I misread or you mistyped. I'm certainly aware of the cash for keys strategy...I've never considered hiring a lawyer to do something like that but to each their own. I'll also concede that he may be very good at negotiating settlements but again, that's not getting somebody evicted in 2-3 months, it's simply negotiation. We are obviously talking about two different things. 

Post: Wholesaling with Honesty?

Mike B.Posted
  • Developer
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 428
  • Votes 349
Originally posted by @Account Closed:

@Tony Roberts I am an out of state landlord. I get calls and texts and yellow letters and postcards all the time offering to "buy" my property. I have never been cold called.by a realtor. Thats the difference.

 Are you suggesting that Realtors don't market for new business?

Post: Non-metered properties with high water bills

Mike B.Posted
  • Developer
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 428
  • Votes 349

@Silvia Falip nothing you can do (that I’m aware of). I was in a flip for several months and ended up having to pay a $1,500 water bill because I didn’t know I had to register the building as vacant. I was outraged...

Post: Wholesaling with Honesty?

Mike B.Posted
  • Developer
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 428
  • Votes 349
Originally posted by @Jerryll Noorden:
Originally posted by @Mike B.:
Originally posted by @Ross Gleason:

Further, this thread is the first time I've ever seen Jerryl on the site. 

 What the hell dude. I am FAMOUS!!

Lol I see your post count, playboy. Don’t know how I missed ya.  

Post: Wholesaling with Honesty?

Mike B.Posted
  • Developer
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 428
  • Votes 349
Originally posted by @Ross Gleason:

@Jerryll Noorden I understand that everything is situational, but the specific numbers he provided gave no context and was specifically constructed to make realtors look bad. I'm not saying that all of his points aren't valid, I was only trying to show that that one specific point was not constructed well, there are certainly situations where those numbers hold to be true and I can't refute that. But offering those numbers up as a "this is always true" statement is inherently false. I even acknowledged that in my original post, that there are situations where using a wholesaler may cost the initial seller less.

The benefit of providing an unbiased argument (even if you yourself are biased) is it allows others to see how you think and the real benefits of using your way of things with as much of the necessary information as possible. Giving a flat statement like that is misleading because there is no possible way that those numbers always hold true.

On a separate note, your use of condescending language tells me that you've only come to defend your friend instead of providing something useful to the conversation. I would really appreciate it if you would refrain from treating me and other people on the internet like some monkey with a keyboard because we have a slight disagreement. Especially given this is a networking forum where many people expect the respect and professionalism that you would expect from other industry professionals.

No, I asked about one specific example, I never said it was the case in every situation.

Further, this thread is the first time I've ever seen Jerryl on the site. 

Post: Wholesaling with Honesty?

Mike B.Posted
  • Developer
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 428
  • Votes 349
Originally posted by @Brian Pulaski:
Originally posted by @Mike B.:
Originally posted by @Storm S.:

@Dean Carter contrary to wholesalers beliefs, realtors can offer sellers quick and fast closing to investor clients off market too

 Yes, anybody can "offer" quick and fast closings, but can you guarantee it? Will you hand the seller $5k nonrefundable on the spot to back up your claim? That's the difference I'm referring to.

I rarely is ever see wholesalers who do this. The majority (not all) are new to REI and have no money. They can't guarantee anything. Most offer $0-100 EMD, not $5000 (just look through forum posts on the subject).

The larger outfits probably can, but I see more people discussing clauses to get out of wholesale deals, than ways to close if they can’t find a buyer.

I’m not saying everyone should go realtor verse wholesaler, as it seems most wholesale deals the seller wasn’t even a seller until contacted, and that to me is where the wholesaler stands out (marketing to potential leads). I just don’t agree the wholesaler “will” sell the house in instances a realtor won’t. In the market we are in, deals get tons of offers from flippers/buy and holders.

People call themselves wholesalers without ever completing a deal. I can say that I'm an Astronaut, it doesn't make it true. Nor would it make sense for someone to judge all Astronauts based on my claim to be one.

I really think the disconnect here is that most of the claims against wholesalers are based off of what you're reading on this site. You have to keep in mind that this is one of the first places new people come to learn and the term wholesaler is the easiest title to give yourself in the investment community.

Post: Wholesaling with Honesty?

Mike B.Posted
  • Developer
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 428
  • Votes 349
Originally posted by @Ross Gleason:

@Mike B. While I'm not someone who has any experience with wholesaling, that last point isn't really a fair argument to make because those numbers are situational. I know that a realtors commission is a percentage of the total value of the home, so if you're competing for the sale of an expensive home those may hold true but what about with cheaper homes. 

In my hometown, a lot of the flips that I see are being sold initially for around 50-70k. Your 10k upcharge is going to be significantly more of the equity than the commission of a realtor. A true unbiased argument there should have been "A wholesaler will put in similar amounts of effort to a realtor for less of a cut on higher priced homes (If your cut is 10k then your generally going to make less than an agent on homes priced over 167k).

Even if we use the same number, the point still holds true. The original claim was that "every cent a wholesaler makes comes from only one place - the equity of the property"...but so does the Realtor's commission. I'm not understanding why it's a noble act for a Realtor to charge that fee yet looked at as dishonest when a wholesaler charges a fee.