Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Mike Lambert

Mike Lambert has started 3 posts and replied 1369 times.

Post: Fideicomisos VS. Mexican Corporation for STR in Mexico

Mike Lambert
Posted
  • Investor
  • The Americas and Europe
  • Posts 1,405
  • Votes 1,206

Hi Natasha,

You can choose between the two. In doing so, bear in mind that the cost and admin of a corporation is higher and that the tax treatment is different:

1. With a fideicomiso, the first $200k is tax-free when you sell.

2. With a fideicomiso, the gross income is taxed through a withholding tax whereas, with the corporation, the rate, you can deduct expenses but the taxation rate is higher.

Post: Seeking Advice on Best Long-Term Investment Locations in the USA or Caribbean for STR

Mike Lambert
Posted
  • Investor
  • The Americas and Europe
  • Posts 1,405
  • Votes 1,206

Hi @Natasha Rooney, you can do either or.

Post: Anyone Invested Internationally? Mexico?

Mike Lambert
Posted
  • Investor
  • The Americas and Europe
  • Posts 1,405
  • Votes 1,206

@Alex Scattareggia, the withholding tax, as you suggested, doesn't have to be an issue providing that your property is profitable enough. As you mentioned, you can get overall higher profitability than in the US or Canada but, like in those market, long gone are the days when you could buy any property and make a killing as an STR.

Too many people go to Mexico and buy any property because it looks good. That can work for a lifestyle buyer but isn't ideal for an investor. Investor needs to do their home work.

So, @Hannah Tate, great job asking the community for help. You're on the right path.

Post: Anyone using MTR strategies in Mexico?

Mike Lambert
Posted
  • Investor
  • The Americas and Europe
  • Posts 1,405
  • Votes 1,206

Hey Alex,

I'm not sure what you mean by converting. You can do both at the same time. It's a matter of managing your calendar. In Mexico, as you know, when you rent to visitors, you generally don't do LTR. It's automatically MTR (by the month).

The best strategy is to do MTR in the low season and STR in the high season. Of course, if somebody wants to do an MTR in the high season and at a very attractive rate, you might as well take it. Similarly if somebody wants to rent for multiple months right away at an attractive rate, you might take it too, especially if it's in the low season.

Post: Anyone Invested Internationally? Mexico?

Mike Lambert
Posted
  • Investor
  • The Americas and Europe
  • Posts 1,405
  • Votes 1,206
Quote from @Hannah Tate:
Quote from @Mike Lambert:

@Camilo Restrepo, I don't have any opinion and, to be clear, I'm neither arguing with you nor trying to convince of anything. There are many opinions but there's only one set of facts. If you want to make a comparison, you can check Airdna. IMHO, your problem was not Mexico, it was Cancun. As I wrote in my first reply here, I'd never invest there in an STR. It makes no sense. I'm actually surprised you managed to get a 9% ROI but I guess that's thanks to you being a good operator and getting 95% occupancy as a result. You can't compete against the all-inclusives unless you offer complimentary food and booze or you're cheap, as you seem to be confirming.

This being said:

1) Properties in Mexico/Cancun trade in USD so you have no foreign exchange risk in Mexico while properties in Colombia are traded in COP, the Colombian peso, which has been tanking over the years, eliminating any hope for capital gains for American investors.

2) You can get a mortgage in Mexico but you can't in Colombia so even with lower revenue, Cancun would likely still be more profitable, even if you don't take capital gains into account.

3) The political risk is much higher in Colombia, especially at this present time.

Is Cartagena a bad investment? I don't think so if you're ok with the currency and political risks. But, like most people, I prefer Mexico. For the reasons I mentioned, there's no contest far as I'm concerned.

Anyway, the most important is that you seem to be doing well and be happy about it. Let's hope the COP stops to fall, in which case I'd be keen to invest more in Colombia. 

@Mike Lambert - Thanks for providing this perspective. In truth, that is really what I came here for. I would love to pick your brain on some things. As you might imagine, there is some additional context to my situation and if anything would love to learn about some of the challenges you have faced and the reason why you chose to invest in Mexico and went in that direction. Can I send you a DM?


 Sure. Happy to help if I can.

Post: Seeking Advice on Best Long-Term Investment Locations in the USA or Caribbean for STR

Mike Lambert
Posted
  • Investor
  • The Americas and Europe
  • Posts 1,405
  • Votes 1,206
Quote from @Nick Belsky:
Quote from @Mike Lambert:

@Nick Belsky

I'm not sure why you're generalizing the mortgage conditions in Belize to the rest of the area because they're very different. I've been investing on the area for years and I haven't seen that kind of conditions anywhere else. For example, in Mexico, you don't have to put minimum 40-60% down, interest rates are not in the 10's and you can get 20- to 30-year mortgages and you can't get any shorter actually and the right areas would fir within @Richard Foltys' criteria. As Nick mentioned, Airdna would be helpful here.

Mexico may be the exception.  Moxi offers very reasonable terms for Mexico, but they only lend in Mexico.  My example was to compare and contrast, in general, that you will not find similar terms to what you find for US properties.  Obviously, that does not apply to every single market on the Caribbean, but generally speaking, it does.

Cheers!

Nick, as you mentioned, Mexico's the best for that matter indeed. Pretty much all the banks in Mexico lending to foreigners offer better terms but there are other countries offering better terms as well. On the other hand, other countries, like Nicaragua for example, likely offer worse terms, if you can get a mortgage at all but I'm not sure anybody would want to buy an STR in those countries anyway.

Post: Seeking Advice on Best Long-Term Investment Locations in the USA or Caribbean for STR

Mike Lambert
Posted
  • Investor
  • The Americas and Europe
  • Posts 1,405
  • Votes 1,206

@Nick Belsky

I'm not sure why you're generalizing the mortgage conditions in Belize to the rest of the area because they're very different. I've been investing in the area for years (not in Belize) and I haven't seen the kind of conditions you're describing so maybe they just apply to Belize. For example, in Mexico, you can put less than 40-60% down, interest rates are in the single digits and you can get 20- to 30-year mortgages (and you can't get anything shorter actually) and the right areas would fit within @Richard Foltys' criteria. As Nick mentioned, Airdna would be helpful here.

Post: US Citizen/Resident Airbnbing Properties In Portugal?

Mike Lambert
Posted
  • Investor
  • The Americas and Europe
  • Posts 1,405
  • Votes 1,206

Hi Jake, the fact that you're a US citizen/resident has absolutely no bearing on the process. The rules are the same for everyone. You need to research/know the rules, laws and regulations (including HOA if applicable), like you'd do in any US city.

Post: has anyone invested outside of the US - for example COCO in Bali

Mike Lambert
Posted
  • Investor
  • The Americas and Europe
  • Posts 1,405
  • Votes 1,206

@Rusdianto Rusdianto

Leasehold isn't ownership and so you don't have control. And, then, as time passes, because the lifetime of the lease decreases, the real value of the property actually decreases towards 0 until the lease gets renewed and there's absolutely no guarantee that it will. The purpose of owning real estate is to have the value go up over time, not to 0. I'd never buy under leasehold but, if you want to "own" in Bali , you have to accept that. Otherwise, there are many other countries with high growth potential, tourism demand, and relatively affordable prices compared to Western markets that don't discriminate again foreigners that way.

What you mention about corporations is interesting. But that leaves me asking: If the Indonesian government indeed doesn't want foreigners to own/control land in the country, why would they allow for such an obvious loophole? In other words, what's the catch? There are other countries in which you can buy through a corporations but foreigners cannot own or control more than 49% of the company.

Post: has anyone invested outside of the US - for example COCO in Bali

Mike Lambert
Posted
  • Investor
  • The Americas and Europe
  • Posts 1,405
  • Votes 1,206

Yes, I've been investing overseas for years and help many others doing so but investing internationally differs from country to country so asking about international and specifically in Bali.

There can be fraud everywhere, including in the US, so you should always beware and the risk will be higher or lower, depending on the country. When it comes to taxes, it'll depend on the country.

I personally haven't and I won't invest in Asia because you almost never can own the land freehold. That's the problem because you have no ultimate control of your property and it's a sign that you're treated second class compared to the locals . I don't know about you but I don't want to invest money where I'm treated second class, with all the consequences that go with that.