Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Michael Williams

Michael Williams has started 1 posts and replied 6 times.

What exactly is ePartner Software, and how do we get it?

I found this page that refers to "ePartner® Real Estate Software - Personal Edition" and "ePartner® Real Estate Software - Enterprise Edition".  That is on the "freedommentor" website, which is Phil Pustejovsky, who gets decidedly, mixed, reviews, here.  There are only two, other threads about this software but they aren't very insightful. When you go to the main URL, it just asks you to log in, with no apparent way to figure out what it is.

If you look in this video, it seems Peter Harris of Commercial Property Advisors also uses this software for his mentorship program, and tThat video actually makes it look pretty interesting.

Any insights into how to get it?

Originally posted by @Nnabuenyi Anigbogu:
Originally posted by @Michael Williams:
Originally posted by @Nnabuenyi Anigbogu:
Originally posted by @Jason R.:

@Nnabuenyi Anigbogu Congrats on your success and new marriage! I love hearing about the power of partners.

I agree with @Demetrius Gresham hopefully you'll be sharing your story on a future BP Podcast.

@Michael Williams One more thing to consider. You're comparing a compounded stock market return to a non-compounded REI return. If you want to make a better comparison, you should either factor out the compounding from the stock market calculation (and pretend the returns are used as income) or you should calculate the return on real estate if the cash flow and equity is reinvested. In your scenario, you're assuming that equity and cash flow are never reinvested, but that's not likely in the real world. Adding to what Nnabuenyi said, if you make it an apples to apples comparison, his ROI would dwarf the stock market ROI in your example.

Jason that is a good way of putting it. People i debate with often compare the non compounded return with a compounded one in order to show me how the ROI is better with the Stock market. I like the way you broke it down. For those of us investing with full time jobs, all the profit is reinvested and that should be factored into any ROI comparison to get a true picture.

Guys - do yourself a favor and game it out for 30 years. Don't just assume you make more in real estate!  In my situation, where i have a bunch of cash already, there is no way I am able to create a spreadsheet that shows, over 30 years, even if I live off the interest of my stock market investments, will I instead make more money by investing in Real Estate. I LOVE INVESTING IN REAL ESTATE! It's fun! It's interesting! It's manly!! But it also loses me money. Are you really willing to bet the next 30 years of your life on something that you could evaluate in a couple of hours in Excel and *perhaps* discover that all that effort will just cost you money??

I double-dog dare you: post your Excel spreadsheet that shows how you make more money in real estate over 30 years, compared to 10% compounded in the stock market AND ALSO where you subtract out your living expenses from your stock market investments. You post yours, then I'll post mine. (I sort of already did!)

Hi Micheal, you may be right or wrong. Numbers can be manipulated to show whatever a person wants and im not here to convince you to change your investing style. I personally don't have a spreadsheet comparing the 30 year return in REI vs Stocks.

My only argument is that my specific situation with my Giddings property that you analyzed cannot be beat by the stock market in my opinion and here is why. I put down 100K to purchase a property and generate cashflow. In less than a year i am able to pull out 100% (some people pull out more) of my 100K. Now i still own the building, live for free and am making the 7% you had listed on your spreadsheet. The kicker is that im making all that money without any of my own money in the building. I am free to reinvest that 100k in the stock market and will only be 9-12 months of compounding behind someone who went straight to the stock market initially.

 I fail to see how taking that initial 100K and buying stocks with it can generate more returns than this scenario. Please enlighten me. 

I appreciate the success you are having -- rock on! But you are missing the point. Yes, you made a great return on that investment. But you are still alive. And we are all hoping you live for many decades more!  You will NOT be able to do that deal, with every one of your dollars, for the next 30 years. IMPOSSIBLE.  You will not always have that much appreciation. You will not always be able to take out money in the morning and then reinvest it in the afternoon -- there will be times when your money will sit in your bank account, and more and more so the bigger you get. You will hit many economies of scale -- you can't personally manage 1,000 rentals or 10,000 rentals all by yourself. You will need to pay lots of people to do this for you. You won't be able to find and buy enough properties to invest all your money into. Etc, etc.  When you invest in the stock market, every penny is working for you every second of every day.

When you have say as "little" as $1 million you can not only live off your investments, but the money you don't live off of will grow faster than if you invested it in the real estate. This becomes more and more true if you have 2 or 3 million. 

For your own sake, try this!  Plug in numbers that make sense to you. But let's say you are 30 years old, want to live off of $80,000 per year, already have $2,000,000, want to retire when you are 31, want to live 40 more years (that's the max it will go), and expect 10% return on your investments (reasonable).  Not only can you live off $80,000 per year (adjusting upward every year), but 40 years later you will have $50,000,000! 

In other words, the day you achieve $2 million, you can easily retire, never work another day in your life, live off $80K/year, and have tens of millions of dollars to pass to your children, set up a foundation, give to charity, etc. Or if you don't have kids, you can crank that $80K number up and live an even more comfortable life, etc. without ever needing to work again. 

This is just an example. Plug in your actual numbers and game it out.

And this is just one calculator. There are numerous others. And you can compare what you actually could achieve in real estate investing -- that's where I showed you earlier how it might look like a lot, but it turns out to only be 7%, which makes a MASSIVE difference over 40 years. Try it out in the calculator!

Originally posted by @Nnabuenyi Anigbogu:
Originally posted by @Jason R.:

@Nnabuenyi Anigbogu Congrats on your success and new marriage! I love hearing about the power of partners.

I agree with @Demetrius Gresham hopefully you'll be sharing your story on a future BP Podcast.

@Michael Williams One more thing to consider. You're comparing a compounded stock market return to a non-compounded REI return. If you want to make a better comparison, you should either factor out the compounding from the stock market calculation (and pretend the returns are used as income) or you should calculate the return on real estate if the cash flow and equity is reinvested. In your scenario, you're assuming that equity and cash flow are never reinvested, but that's not likely in the real world. Adding to what Nnabuenyi said, if you make it an apples to apples comparison, his ROI would dwarf the stock market ROI in your example.

Jason that is a good way of putting it. People i debate with often compare the non compounded return with a compounded one in order to show me how the ROI is better with the Stock market. I like the way you broke it down. For those of us investing with full time jobs, all the profit is reinvested and that should be factored into any ROI comparison to get a true picture.

Guys - do yourself a favor and game it out for 30 years. Don't just assume you make more in real estate!  In my situation, where i have a bunch of cash already, there is no way I am able to create a spreadsheet that shows, over 30 years, even if I live off the interest of my stock market investments, will I instead make more money by investing in Real Estate. I LOVE INVESTING IN REAL ESTATE! It's fun! It's interesting! It's manly!! But it also loses me money. Are you really willing to bet the next 30 years of your life on something that you could evaluate in a couple of hours in Excel and *perhaps* discover that all that effort will just cost you money??

I double-dog dare you: post your Excel spreadsheet that shows how you make more money in real estate over 30 years, compared to 10% compounded in the stock market AND ALSO where you subtract out your living expenses from your stock market investments. You post yours, then I'll post mine. (I sort of already did!)

Originally posted by @Nnabuenyi Anigbogu:

By the way i just did a calculation. If you put in 100k in the market at an return rate of 10% (which is decent) and you deduct 1000 a month for rent, you actually have a negative return over 30 years. That alone is enough to show that for this particular situation, real estate FAR outweighs anything the market can do. That would be a true apples to apples comparison since you have to live somewhere. Also i can take all of my extra cash flow (even if it is 1k a month) plus the money i would have paid in rent (1k) and then invest that in the market for 30 years. 

12K a year (1k a month) invested at 10% for 30 years compounded daily = 2.2 million. 24k compunded is 4.5 mil. To do a true comparison as you are trying to do you have to factor these numbers in. Otherwise you are picking and choosing.

So if you could just find a job that pays you $1k/mo to cover rent, and you invest your $100K for 30 years at 30% or more return (your numbers), you will end up with about 3/4 Billion dollars. Or more!  Is that your expectation?

Originally posted by @Nnabuenyi Anigbogu:
Originally posted by @Michael Williams:

PLEASE help me understand this. Please!

Go here and download the BP Renal Analysis spreadsheet.

Do your best to enter in numbers for the Albany Park 4-Unit. (the OP didn't really give us enough into to fill this out completely, such as Interest Rate, etc) I put in numbers until it worked.

Look at the first image below, it shows the numbers pretty much identical to the OP, right down to NOI.

Now look at the second image. This is what you get when you slide all the way to the right and evaluate this property after a full 30 years. On his $100,000 investment he made a Total Return, including Equity Accrued, of $761,181.  

Now whip open your handy compound interest calculator and dial in 100,00 for 30 years, and here's the important bit -- 7% interest -- and you get $761,226 -- basically the same number.

I must be missing something!

Yes I know he can rent out one more unit and make some more money, but it does not make much difference in the end. Because from everything I can tell, if you invest extremely conservatively in the stock market for 30 years you will achieve at least a 7% return, and almost certainly higher, and you did not have to spend 30 years of your life being a landlord, plunging toilets, evicting tenants, doing rehabs, financing properties, etc., etc.  Now maybe you like doing all that stuff -- but if you had the choice between 30 years of work, or 30 years of literally no work at all PLUS MORE MONEY which would you choose? Would anyone actually prefer to make less money and do lots of work?!

Again, perhaps I am missing something entirely. Please let me know!

 You make some good points Micheal. However there are plenty of things that are not factored here that can challenge what you said.

First of all as you stated cash flow is increasing. I am moving out next month which adds over 1k a month (12K a year) into the cash flow category. That right there drastically increases the total return over time (an extra 360K at the minimum). Second the rents on one are going up over 200 a month in about 4 months (originally rented in winter) and rents on another are going up about 100. 300 more a month is quite a bit and can really move the ROI meter.

Another very important aspect you did not consider, while living there i am saving 1000-1500 a month in rent. If i put 100K in the stock market i still have to go pay 1000-1500 (based on my area for a 1-2 bed) in rent. so if you want to compare it to that you should subtract 1000-1500 every month from the money you put in the stock market at 7% for 30 years. I bet your returns are now much lower. (minimum of 360K subtracted from your return plus all the compounding that would have come with it)

Another aspect not factored is depreciation. This year i am taking about 12K or so in depreciation which lowers my taxable income by 12K. That is another bucket that cannot be gotten from stocks and increases ROI by decreasing the amount you have to pay the Gov.

Another great one, appreciation. My building i bought last year for 500K was appraised at 645K when i went to get a heloc a couple of months ago. So i have made 145K in equity in less than a year due to the area gentrifying. I pulled out 50K of my initial investment that i am using to flip so technically i no longer have 100K in the building. Redo your analysis with 50K and i guarantee you get a different ROI also. I would have pulled out all 100K but did not know the building would appraise for that much. I will pull out the rest of the 100K (maybe more) in about 4-5 months and at that time my cash on cash return is infinite because i have no money in the building (and the rents cover all of it and still pays me cash every month). Try doing that in the stock market. If you buy in a good area and wait 30 years you will always get appreciation. However i bought in an area that is rapidly gentrifying so that i can be sure it appreciates quickly

So in the end i fail to see how the stock market can beat this unless you consistently return 30%+ a year. In which case i need to park some money with you and you need to start a hedge fund asap.

@Nnabuenyi Anigbogu -- I *really* want to invest in real estate! I like the work, and I assumed it would make me more money than just investing in the market. But I really don't see the numbers working out.

I took that spreadsheet, upped your Income by $1000/month and it brings your total return after 30 years to 1,159,804. To get that in the market you would have to earn a rate of 8.5%, and never work a day in your life. If you increase the rent some more, that just means you need a few more fractions of points more in the market.

I totally get that we all have to live somewhere, so it seems like paying yourself in a mortgage is better than paying a landlord in rent. But again, every penny you have in the market is compounding over 30 years. But every penny you pay on your mortgage is NOT going to you -- much of it goes to interest, of course. You really have to run all the numbers to get the complete comparison.

We could go back and forth on numbers all day -- but all I see is the bottom line. Do I really want to work really hard for 30 years and earn the same amount as I would have earned if I did nothing at all? That's why I look at the bottom-line number on that spreadsheet -- THAT indicates what your true return was, or will be, after 30 years.

And I really think we have to run some numbers at 30% return to see if that is actually realistic. There are lots of guys with $1 million, right? Any number of them could take their $1 million, invest in real estate for 30 years at 30%, and -- what would they end up with? $2,619,995,643! Try it here. That's $2.6 Billion!  I really don't think there are many guys who do that! I think you quickly run into economies-of-scale, mortgage rates and down payments are higher for Commercial loans, etc. If you leave your $1 million in the market, every penny is working every single day for you, with no effort on your part, even if you have $2.6 Billion!

I don't want to get off-topic, or into politics at all! But there is one guy who fancied himself a great real estate developer, but it turns out if he had never worked a day in his life he would have BILLIONS more dollars. One could argue that his entire lifetime of work was wasted. Check this out.

I don't want to be that guy! At the end of 30 years you can look back at all your numbers and see exactly what your rate of return was on all your money, and you will be able to see exactly what you would have earned in the market.  What if it didn't work out?!  Again, I have invested in real estate in the past, and I am all geared up to do it again -- but I did some hard-analysis of some real numbers, and I just don't see them working out. This is SO not what I expected!

PLEASE help me understand this. Please!

Go here and download the BP Renal Analysis spreadsheet.

Do your best to enter in numbers for the Albany Park 4-Unit. (the OP didn't really give us enough into to fill this out completely, such as Interest Rate, etc) I put in numbers until it worked.

Look at the first image below, it shows the numbers pretty much identical to the OP, right down to NOI.

Now look at the second image. This is what you get when you slide all the way to the right and evaluate this property after a full 30 years. On his $100,000 investment he made a Total Return, including Equity Accrued, of $761,181.  

Now whip open your handy compound interest calculator and dial in 100,00 for 30 years, and here's the important bit -- 7% interest -- and you get $761,226 -- basically the same number.

I must be missing something!

Yes I know he can rent out one more unit and make some more money, but it does not make much difference in the end. Because from everything I can tell, if you invest extremely conservatively in the stock market for 30 years you will achieve at least a 7% return, and almost certainly higher, and you did not have to spend 30 years of your life being a landlord, plunging toilets, evicting tenants, doing rehabs, financing properties, etc., etc.  Now maybe you like doing all that stuff -- but if you had the choice between 30 years of work, or 30 years of literally no work at all PLUS MORE MONEY which would you choose? Would anyone actually prefer to make less money and do lots of work?!

Again, perhaps I am missing something entirely. Please let me know!

OP Numbers:

OP Grand Total Return:

OP Rate of Return

Just for fun -- if you take $100,000 and put it in the stock market for 30 years and make 10% return, you will end up with $1,744,940 -- a cool Million Dollars more -- wow!  And no work at all.