@Brenton Arriaga
I guess I have to ask. Why $100k or less? Is it because that’s what you can afford?
If you’ve ever read any Robert Kiyosaki, he always says:
“The poor say ‘I can’t afford that’”
“The rich ask ‘how can I afford that?’”
Price what you pay, value is what you get.
So if I was to find you a $100k or less property that was guaranteed to lose you money. Would you buy it? What about $50k? How about $25k?
Conversely, if I was to find you a $1M property that was guaranteed to double your money in 30 days, would you pursue that if lack of capital was not a bottleneck?
Many people think that Berkshire Hathaway is an expensive stock because it’s $500k + a share. However that’s not really true. It actually might be a great value stock because of its earnings power and future earnings growth and dividend yield. However a penny stock could be very expensive because it’s a junk company with no earnings and no earnings growth potential.
What I’m trying to say it this.
Michael Blank is right. If lack of access to capital was not a bottleneck would that change your thinking? OPM likes to marry OPT, OPE, and OPO
Other Peoples Time
Other Peoples Experience
And Other Peoples Opportunity
Can you create one of these three aforementioned OPs? If then, you can focus on true wealth which lies in value, not price!