Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Michael Plaks

Michael Plaks has started 104 posts and replied 5133 times.

Post: Tax reform Q&A Thread 5 - Miscellaneous Q&A

Michael Plaks
#1 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
Posted
  • Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 5,188
  • Votes 6,090

Colleagues and friends,

The original GOP reform thread started by @Brandon Hall is well over 200 posts by now. This is one of the follow-up threads - for questions that do not have a dedicated thread.

The other threads are:

  1. Tax reform Thread 1 - Pass-through and 20% deduction
  2. Tax reform Thread 2 - Depreciation and Section 179
  3. Tax reform Thread 3 - Itemized and business deductions
  4. Tax reform Thread 4 - New creative tax strategies

If your question is not one of those four categories - then let's discuss it here. And go!

Post: Tax reform Q&A Thread 4 - New creative tax strategies

Michael Plaks
#1 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
Posted
  • Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 5,188
  • Votes 6,090

Colleagues and friends,

The original GOP reform thread started by @Brandon Hall is well over 200 posts by now. This is one of the follow-up threads specifically for discussion of new creative tax planning strategies, in view of the reform. 

PLEASE POST QUESTIONS IN THE OTHER TAX REFORM THREADS. THIS ONE IS FOR THE DEBATE OF NEW IDEAS.

Specifically, Brandon suggested 2 ideas already:

#1: Allocate more basis to land, to increase room for the 20% deduction and decrease depreciation recapture at sale.

#2: Switch from W2 to 1099, to benefit from the 20% deduction.

Both are subject to debate, and feel free to add your ideas. I will add mine for sure. 

Together, we will conquer this monster legislation and figure out how to benefit from it.

Post: Tax reform Q&A Thread 3 - Itemized and business deductions

Michael Plaks
#1 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
Posted
  • Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 5,188
  • Votes 6,090

Colleagues and friends,

The original GOP reform thread started by @Brandon Hall is well over 200 posts by now. This is one of the follow-up threads specifically for discussion of personal itemized (Schedule A) deductions and general business (Schedules C/E) deductions. PLEASE POST OTHER QUESTIONS IN THE OTHER TAX REFORM THREADS.

There are dedicated threads for the new 20% pass-through deduction and for depreciation. Section 179.

Here is a start.

1. Personal itemized deductions changed dramatically.

Here is a very good and illustrated explanation of the Schedule A changes from Forbes.

2. Business and real estate investment deductions are NOT affected. You can still deduct 100% of mortgage interest and property taxes on all your investment properties.

There're lots of questions left, and nobody has all the answers. We all expect more rules from the IRS that will change the game. Meanwhile - let's debate it here. As long as it's on topic, please. There are other threads for other tax reform topics.

Post: Tax reform Q&A Thread 2 - Depreciation and Section 179

Michael Plaks
#1 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
Posted
  • Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 5,188
  • Votes 6,090

Colleagues and friends,

The original GOP reform thread started by @Brandon Hall is well over 200 posts by now. This is one of the follow-up threads specifically for discussion of depreciation and Section 179 changes in the tax reform. PLEASE POST OTHER QUESTIONS IN THE OTHER TAX REFORM THREADS.

Here is a start.

1. Fundamental depreciation rules have not changed. Still 27.5-yr (residential) and 39-yr (commercial) depreciation for buildings.

2. Section 179 is expanded from $500k to $1mil and now includes certain improvements to non-residential properties: roofs, HVAC, alarms and security systems. 

Note: Single-family homes and apartments are residential property and cannot use the expanded deduction.

3. There is a 100% "bonus depreciation" allowing immediate deduction for new and used (!) property that is below 20-yr depreciation. Buildings do not qualify, but 15-yr land improvements and 5- 7- 10-yr personal property does. Cost segregation gets a huge boost.

The rule is retroactive to 9/28/2017 - making this available for some investors on their 2017 tax returns.

4. Depreciation limits for personal automobiles used in business are dramatically improved. Also retroactive to 9/28/2017.

5. There is a new 15-yr category "Qualified improvements" that replaces the existing Retail improvements, Leasehold improvements, and Restaurant improvements.

There're lots of questions left, and nobody has all the answers. We all expect more rules from the IRS that will change the game. Meanwhile - let's debate it here. As long as it's on topic, please. There are other threads for other tax reform topics.

Post: Tax reform Q&A Thread 1 - Pass-through and 20% deduction

Michael Plaks
#1 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
Posted
  • Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 5,188
  • Votes 6,090

Colleagues and friends, 

The original GOP reform thread started by @Brandon Hall is well over 200 posts by now. This is one of the follow-up threads specifically for discussion of pass-through entities (Sch C / Sch E sole proprietorships, LLCs, partnerships, S-corps) that will enjoy a 20% deduction under the tax reform. PLEASE POST OTHER QUESTIONS IN THE OTHER TAX REFORM THREADS.

As of today, we have a consensus on several points.

1. All forms of doing business (aka business entities) EXCEPT C-corporations and trusts will be treated the same way, as pass-through entities:

  • no entity / sole proprietorship / single-member LLC using Schedule C for non-rental business
  • no entity / sole proprietorship / single-member LLC using Schedule E for rental business
  • partnerships and LLCs filing as partnerships
  • S-corporations and LLCs filing as S-corporations

2. All of them are eligible for a 20% deduction from their net profit - i.e. after all deductions

Example 1: Susan the wholesaler makes $150k in assignment fees - gross profit. She deducts $50k marketing, driving, and whatnot - resulting in $100k net profit. 20% of that amount - or $20,000 - is Susan's new "freebie" deduction.

Example 2: Brad the apartment guy collects $300k rent from his property. He deducts $150k for property taxes, mortgage interest and insurance (they are not limited in the reform!) He deducts another $50k for maintenance, repairs and depreciation. Brad is left with $100k net rental income. He also gets a 20% freebie deduction equal to $20,000.

Note: if your business or rental properties show a net loss - there is no 20% deduction. 20% of zero is zero, sorry.

3. This deduction is "under the line" - meaning it is NOT subtracted from the AGI. 

4. This deduction is per business. If you have multiple businesses - each one calculates its own deduction. They will eventually add up on your tax return.

5. This deduction is not limited as long as your total taxable income (including W2s and everything else) is under the threshold:

  • $315,000 for a jointly filing couple
  • $157,500 for everybody else

6. Once you cross the threshold, your 20% deduction becomes limited. You can choose between two ways to figure the limitation, whichever is best.

  • 50% of all W2 salaries paid by the business - or -
  • 25% of all W2 salaries plus 2.5% of initial basis of all depreciable business assets

Example 1: ABC Flip-Flopping, a one-owner S-corp, generated $650k in income (after deductions) and paid $150k in salaries, resulting in $500k net income. The 20% deduction would be $100k. However, it is limited by 50% of the $150k salaries, or $75k. Only $75,000 is deductible. The company has no assets, so it cannot benefit from the alternative limit.

Example 2: XYZ Slumlords, an LLC-partnership, owns an apartment complex that they purchased for $2.5 mil. It generates $500k net income (after all expenses and depreciation) and pays no salaries. 20% deduction would be $100k. Since there're no salaries - we have to use 2.5% of depreciable basis. Let's say that $0.5 mil was allocated to land - which leaves $2 mil depreciable basis. 2.5% of $2 mil is $50k - which is our limit. Only $50,000 is deductible.

7. If you're a "service business" AND over the threshold mentioned in #5 above - then your 20% deduction gets phased out and completely disappears at:

  • $415,000 for a jointly filing couple
  • $207,500 for everybody else

The definition of service business is "where the principal asset of the business is the reputation or skill of 1 or more of its employees" - which is not totally clear. It looks like Realtors and brokers are considered service businesses.

There're lots of questions left, and nobody has all the answers. We all expect more rules from the IRS that will change the game. Meanwhile - let's debate it here. As long as it's on topic, please. There are other threads for other tax reform topics.

Post: Tax Filing on Foreclosed Rehabd Primary Residence/Rental Property

Michael Plaks
#1 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
Posted
  • Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 5,188
  • Votes 6,090

@Steve K.

Most of your questions are answered in this blog post by @Brandon Hall

Post: QBI calculation for Sch C - accountants are confused, too

Michael Plaks
#1 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
Posted
  • Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 5,188
  • Votes 6,090
Originally posted by @Lance Lvovsky:
Originally posted by @Michael Plaks:
Originally posted by @Lance Lvovsky:
Originally posted by @Michael Plaks:
Originally posted by @Lance Lvovsky:
Originally posted by @Michael Plaks:

@Lance Lvovsky

But do you agree that, until further clarifications, reasonable salary for S-Corp becomes even trickier - i.e. much more incentive to lowball it, leading to more controversy and litigation?

 It depends. S Corp shareholders will want to ensure they get the benefit of the 20% deduction, and for many non-capital intensive businesses, such as mortgage brokers, real estate brokers, attorneys, physicians, etc., it will be important to pay a salary sufficient so to get the 20% deduction.

 No salary is required under the threshold. 

 Without the salary, there will be no deduction for many business owners...

Lance, there is NO salary limitation under the threshold, that's the whole issue! S-corp could have $0 salary, and the entire $100k will qualify as QBI and allow a $20k deduction! So is Sch C. 

But S-corp has a statutory requirement to pay a reasonable salary - in other words, a statutory requirement to shoot itself in the foot. Sch C does NOT have a similar requirement, with the respect to QBI.

 You are forgetting that taxpayers whose income exceed the threshold ($157,500/$315,000) cannot take the deduction unless they meet other requirements, such as the business paying wages. See below:

The qualified business income deduction for noncorporate taxpayer is applied to partnerships and S corporations at the partner or shareholder level. (Code Sec. 199A(f)(1)(A)(i)) Thus, each partner or shareholder must take into account his allocable share of each qualified item of income, gain, deduction, and loss (Code Sec. 199A(f)(1)(A)(ii)), and is treated as having W-2 wages for the tax equal to his allocable share of the W-2 wages of the partnership or S corporation for the tax year (as determined under IRS regs). (Code Sec. 199A(f)(1)(A)(iii)) A partner's or shareholder's allocable share of W-2 wages is determined in the same manner as the partner's or shareholder's allocable share of wage expenses and a partner's or shareholder's allocable share of the unadjusted basis immediately after acquisition of qualified property is determined in the same manner as the partner's or shareholder's allocable share of depreciation. In the case of an S corporation, an allocable share is the shareholder's pro rata share of an item. (Code Sec. 199A(f)(1)(A))

I'm not forgetting. I specifically talk about people BELOW the threshold.

Post: QBI calculation for Sch C - accountants are confused, too

Michael Plaks
#1 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
Posted
  • Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 5,188
  • Votes 6,090
Originally posted by @Lance Lvovsky:
Originally posted by @Michael Plaks:
Originally posted by @Lance Lvovsky:
Originally posted by @Michael Plaks:

@Lance Lvovsky

But do you agree that, until further clarifications, reasonable salary for S-Corp becomes even trickier - i.e. much more incentive to lowball it, leading to more controversy and litigation?

 It depends. S Corp shareholders will want to ensure they get the benefit of the 20% deduction, and for many non-capital intensive businesses, such as mortgage brokers, real estate brokers, attorneys, physicians, etc., it will be important to pay a salary sufficient so to get the 20% deduction.

 No salary is required under the threshold. 

 Without the salary, there will be no deduction for many business owners...

Lance, there is NO salary limitation under the threshold, that's the whole issue! S-corp could have $0 salary, and the entire $100k will qualify as QBI and allow a $20k deduction! So is Sch C. 

But S-corp has a statutory requirement to pay a reasonable salary - in other words, a statutory requirement to shoot itself in the foot. Sch C does NOT have a similar requirement, with the respect to QBI.

Post: QBI calculation for Sch C - accountants are confused, too

Michael Plaks
#1 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
Posted
  • Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 5,188
  • Votes 6,090
Originally posted by @Lance Lvovsky:
Originally posted by @Michael Plaks:

@Lance Lvovsky

But do you agree that, until further clarifications, reasonable salary for S-Corp becomes even trickier - i.e. much more incentive to lowball it, leading to more controversy and litigation?

 It depends. S Corp shareholders will want to ensure they get the benefit of the 20% deduction, and for many non-capital intensive businesses, such as mortgage brokers, real estate brokers, attorneys, physicians, etc., it will be important to pay a salary sufficient so to get the 20% deduction.

 No salary is required under the threshold. 

Post: QBI calculation for Sch C - accountants are confused, too

Michael Plaks
#1 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
Posted
  • Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 5,188
  • Votes 6,090

@Lance Lvovsky

But do you agree that, until further clarifications, reasonable salary for S-Corp becomes even trickier - i.e. much more incentive to lowball it, leading to more controversy and litigation?