@Don Konipol
"(b)Escrow accounts -
(1)Requirement to escrow for property taxes and insurance. Except as provided inparagraph (b)(2) of this section, a creditor may not extend a higher-priced mortgage loan secured by a first lien on a consumer's principal dwelling unless an escrow account is established before consummation for payment of property taxes and premiums for mortgage-related insurance required by the creditor, such as insurance against loss of or damage to property, or against liability arising out of the ownership or use of the property, or insurance protecting the creditor against the consumer's defaultor other credit loss. For purposes of this paragraph (b), the term “escrow account” has the same meaning as under Regulation X ( 12 CFR 1024.17(b)), as amended."
Your post was extremely informative. What I'm wondering is how did this loan pass origination, get sold, then bought, if it violated the requirement quoted above? In summary, no escrow should have meant no loan or am I missing something?