Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Max James

Max James has started 36 posts and replied 228 times.

Post: Why don't you advertise 'FOR RENT' 6+ months in advance?

Max JamesPosted
  • Investor
  • Cincinnati, OH
  • Posts 229
  • Votes 50
Originally posted by @Elizabeth Colegrove:

I personally advertise as soon as i "know" there is going to be a vacancy. That has worked great for me but it really matters on your area. We are in military areas where people get order 6 months in advance. So it works great for those leaving and those coming in. We do have break lease language that protects people from changing their mind. 

 Nice example Elizabeth!  What do you mean by you have break lease language?  Is that for current residents or future ones?

Post: Why don't you advertise 'FOR RENT' 6+ months in advance?

Max JamesPosted
  • Investor
  • Cincinnati, OH
  • Posts 229
  • Votes 50
Originally posted by @Larry Turowski:

@Max James First, I don't often know a place will be available six months in advance.  Imagine if you have lots of units, this could create a lot of unnecessary work.  Second, most people don't know they are moving six months in advance.  And if they do they are not planning that far out. 

I suppose it could be useful to get a pulse of demand, but you could do that anytime, not just six months in advance.

 Hey Larry, good point on the fact it's going to create some unnecessary work if you have a large amount of units.  Could this be worked into your PM business model though?  To maximize revenue?  If your objective of renting out an apartment is to get the highest rent possible within reason of the comparable market, it seems like it would be worth it to have a system in place to make the extra effort.

As for planning that far out, I think some people actually do plan ahead this far in advance.  Could it be possible this would also attract a higher quality resident?  Could it be that someone who has the mindset to look this far out would be someone who has their life together and be very organized.  Just my 2 cents!

Post: Why don't you advertise 'FOR RENT' 6+ months in advance?

Max JamesPosted
  • Investor
  • Cincinnati, OH
  • Posts 229
  • Votes 50
Originally posted by @JD Martin:

To me it seems unreasonable. What if you have good tenants that tell you 6 months out they plan on buying a house - you advertise and find someone willing to sign a lease that far out. 2 months from the end of the lease, your good tenants tell you that they have decided they would like to stay another year to save up more money. Now you have to let them go and hope the new tenants are as good as the old ones. How many tenants will provide first month + deposit (and maybe last month as well) 6 months in advance? Did the place you rented out give you that money that far in advance? If not, and you send good tenants packing and the new tenants are no-shows, now you have nothing. 

I don't begin advertising availability until a few weeks before a unit will become vacant, at earliest. But all of my units are, by design, in high desirable areas and are easy to rent. So long-term vacancy is not a concern that I worry about. 

 The unit I am referring to is in what I would think is the top three most sought after areas in Cincinnati.  I did receive security deposit, but did not request first months rent.  With the scenario you pointed out above, I do agree, it seems a bit unreasonable.  I guess it really will depend on resident-to-resident situations.  I like to provide future customers with the idea they have locked down their new home well in advance of when they want to move into it.  This eliminates stress on their end and mine as well.  I can also time up the amount of days vacant much better.

Post: Why don't you advertise 'FOR RENT' 6+ months in advance?

Max JamesPosted
  • Investor
  • Cincinnati, OH
  • Posts 229
  • Votes 50

Makes sense to wait in order for current renters to make up their mind.  

With the demand of student housing for UC and Xaiver, it seems like a huge advantage to advertise your units months in advance of the lease expiring.  When I was in college at Ohio University in Athens, we signed leases 12 months in advance of moving into the house.

Post: what do you think of this deal?

Max JamesPosted
  • Investor
  • Cincinnati, OH
  • Posts 229
  • Votes 50

What are your electrical and gas bill and water expenses?

Post: Why don't you advertise 'FOR RENT' 6+ months in advance?

Max JamesPosted
  • Investor
  • Cincinnati, OH
  • Posts 229
  • Votes 50

Is there a good reason why people don't advertise and market their units for rent well in advance of when it's time to turn it over?  I had great luck getting a leased signed in February for a July move in date.  I do not understand why people wait till 30-60 days to start advertising when they know the lease is going to end well in advance of that.  This way, you can also advertise for higher rent you think is within reason and if nobody bites, then drop it some.

How far in advance do you advertise and hope to get a lease signed?

Post: Quadplex Analysis

Max JamesPosted
  • Investor
  • Cincinnati, OH
  • Posts 229
  • Votes 50

This is also assuming you will be managing the property yourself, which I suggest you do.  I would not pay a property manager while you are living in the building.

Post: Quadplex Analysis

Max JamesPosted
  • Investor
  • Cincinnati, OH
  • Posts 229
  • Votes 50
Originally posted by @Mark Douglas:
Originally posted by @Max James:

These are all numbers assuming you do not live in the building.  Which is the main intent (for the long run) of the building.  The other important aspect to consider is the insurance is going to increase by a large amount once you move out of the building.  You will not be able to hold the same kind of insurance since the one you are getting, I'm assuming, will be for owner occupants.  I would ask your insurance agent to run the numbers for once you move out of the building.

What does the BP world think?  Are the above expense assumptions too much?  Not enough?  

 I'd certainly rather overestimate the expenses.... Having said that ,  would this second scenario not cash flow for the first year while I'm in there?

I'm looking into different insurance polices... That's a good point though, to run the numbers with the "investment property" rates.  

I feel good about the cash flow when all units are rented, still unsure about the immediate figures, but I'm working with my realtor to get some accurate data on the property.

While you are in there, you can expect to pay your PITI ($1254), sock away 10% of gross rents into a maintenance account, sock away 10% of gross rents into a cap ex account, pay the water bill, pay the electric bill (since I'm assuming there is common space & outdoor lighting, lets just say this will be $70/month), and that's it pretty much. So even if the units are generating $500/month:

$1500 - $1254 - $133 - $70 = $43/month

So you will be pulling in a positive $43/month while living there the routine expenses are paid.  Pretty awesome right?!  The thing you have to think about too is the maintenance and cap ex.  That is another $400/month you should be putting away for future non routine expenses.  So if you look at it in this sense:

$1500 - $1254 - $133 - $70 -$200 - $200 = -$357/month

If you want to include those items, you would be technically negative cash flowing $357/month.  The odds are you won't be spending $400/month on maintenance and capital expenditures, but you will one day.  Still, in this sense you are only paying $357/month out of your own pocket to live in what will eventually be a positive cash flowing asset.  So I wouldn't get too hung up on the negative cash flowing aspect of $357 while you are living there.  

The thing I would think about and ask around is whether or not the analysis of $102/month cash flow once it is fully up and running as a rental is how you want to run your proforma.  I know @Brandon Turner shoots for $100/door of cash flow per month.  In this case you would want to shoot for $400 of cash flow per month once it is fully up and running when you use all the assumptions I laid out in the above post.

I think it boils down to the PHOTOGRAPHER, not the camera.  I almost think if you are renting to a younger audience, anyone who uses Facebook/Instagram, using your phone might be an advantage.  They might feel more connected with your property listing if you can make them feel like they were pictures they could see themselves taking (and then posting to Facebook or Instagram).

Post: Quadplex Analysis

Max JamesPosted
  • Investor
  • Cincinnati, OH
  • Posts 229
  • Votes 50

These are all numbers assuming you do not live in the building.  Which is the main intent (for the long run) of the building.  The other important aspect to consider is the insurance is going to increase by a large amount once you move out of the building.  You will not be able to hold the same kind of insurance since the one you are getting, I'm assuming, will be for owner occupants.  I would ask your insurance agent to run the numbers for once you move out of the building.

What does the BP world think?  Are the above expense assumptions too much?  Not enough?