Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Max Bellino

Max Bellino has started 8 posts and replied 24 times.

Post: Anderson Business Advisers Asset Protection

Max BellinoPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Massachusetts
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 15
Quote from @Stuart Udis:

@Max Bellino if you feel the need to interview six separate attorneys for this scope you are over complicating your true needs. I frequently come across investors who approach asset protection the way you appear to be approaching the subject and you’re making this unnecessarily complicated. I can’t keep track of the number of  people I come across on bigger pockets who feel the need to create entity structures more complexed than my former employer that owned a hotel portfolio valued over a billion dollars.

 Truth be told, what you need is in fact very simple and where most make mistakes is actually in their day to day operations. If more investors spend a fraction of the time and energy spent worrying about asset protection and do the things on a daily basis that prevents liability exposure, plaintiffs attorneys won’t eat as well. 

To be clear, I believe real estate should be owned by an entity but there are other things that are far more critical to protecting yourself personally as well as your real estate assets such as appropriate levels of insurance, well drafted vendor agreements & collecting insurance certificates coupled with understanding how to correctly operate the entity in which you form. This should be your priority, not interviewing 6 law firms for what amounts to a very  simple legal engagement. 


Understood. What would you recommend as a structure? Because when considering the complexity of transferring funds between LLCs and the desire to streamline real estate operations, establishing a holding company maybe in my primary state of our holdings seems right? As I see it, consolidating all of our assets under a single holding company offers numerous benefits, including tax advantages, better lending oppurtites, and possibly more liability protection. 

I may be overcomplicating things by considering Delaware, but a holding company still seems beneficial, even without charging order protection. Would opting for a non-charging order protection state LLC be simpler?

Post: Anderson Business Advisers Asset Protection

Max BellinoPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Massachusetts
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 15
Quote from @Chris Seveney:

@Max Bellino

Do you know the reason to have a charging company in Delaware and a holding company that holds other LLC's?


How I understand it is: charging order protection shields LLC assets from being seized to settle personal debts or judgments against its members. Creditors can't force the sale of assets within the LLC, preserving their integrity and protecting the business/real estate. Also, offers great lending oppurtites on your equity in your portfolio of assets.(I know you can do a holding company elsewhere but it seems as if mezzanine lenders like Delaware.)

Do I have it wrong?

Post: Anderson Business Advisers Asset Protection

Max BellinoPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Massachusetts
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 15

Hello Everyone,

Thank you for taking the time to read my post. I'm currently navigating the complex process of finding a reputable asset protection attorney with expertise in real estate. My journey has introduced me to the strategies promoted by Anderson Business Advisers. While I'm open to investing in quality service, the feedback I've encountered suggests that Anderson may not deliver on its promises. It appears to be that their focus might lean more towards collecting money rather than providing substantial support and outcomes. I'm particularly interested in establishing a holding company that is a Multi-Member LLC with charging order protection so looking to place it in Delaware. Although I would like to try to do it myself, crafting effective operating agreements is outside my comfort zone. I have talked to 6 different attorneys from a variety of firms (including Anderson), my priority remains to use a firm that is committed to delivering real value and doing the strategies I'm looking for, correctly. Any advice or recommendations would be warmly welcomed.

Thank you!

~Max Bellino

Post: Anyone Have a good attorney in Massachusetts?

Max BellinoPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Massachusetts
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 15

Looking to close on a property and need a attorney. Thank you!  

Post: Give me your advice

Max BellinoPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Massachusetts
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 15
Quote from @Randall Alan:
Quote from @Max Bellino:
Quote from @Randall Alan:

@Max Bellino

So, not to rain on your parade... but if your thought process around the government supporting your grandmother is centered on Medicaid, you are going to be out of luck.  Medicaid does a 5 year look-back as to assets in her name to specifically exclude patients who gift their assets to qualify for Medicaid. So if that is the case, it won't even matter if you sell the asset, as it would be seen as an asset of hers for the next 5 years (or the proceeds would be seen as hers if it was sold).

Here is a link that has more details:

https://www.medicaidplanningas... 

Otherwise, the easiest thing to do is to have a cosigner on the loan to get you over the age & income hump.  You can manage it, etc, and just let it ride in whomever's names until you could eventually refinance the property into yours when you have more income.  You would just need to coordinate on depreciation and such if you were filing taxes separately.  I imagine there is a way for you to split the deductions & such if needed - or one person could take them all, but a CPA could speak to that better.  It is highly likely you will want to refinance it anyway down the road because you will be buying it at a fairly high interest rate in today's rate environment if the first issue of Medicaid doesn't scrap the deal to begin with.

She could still sell the house and then use the funds to pay for her care... so the house can still stay in the family's name though.

Wish you all the best!

Randy



No, from what I understand because my grandmother is selling it at the tax assessed value. She will get the 460k that the sate will dwindle down
eventually. So when they do the look back they see she sold it at a price where they can't come after us/her.  I can't answer confidently as most of the info is from my attorney. It's been tricky to get through the weeds you could say.

@Max Bellino

I did a little more research (being the curious one....) and I was off on exactly what is allowed on medicaid.  You are allowed to have a house... as long as you are living in it or plan to return to it.  But otherwise the asset limit is still $2,000 to $5,000.  Obviously if you are working with a lawyer they know more than we do on all this.   

I think what you are talking about is what is called the Estate Recovery Program... where after someone passes away, Medicaid would seek to recover what they paid for the patient out of the proceeds of their remaining assets... which is often the house.  I pasted in the blurb below... but this is the link to Florida's program... to which I imagine it is similar across the country given it is a Federal program:

https://www.medicaidplanningas... 

------------

Exemption Rules
For home exemption, the Medicaid applicant must live in their home or have Intent to Return, and in 2023, have a home equity interest no greater than $688,000. Equity interest is the amount of the home’s value owned by the applicant after subtracting any home debt. If a non-applicant spouse lives in the home, it is exempt regardless of any other circumstances. For seniors applying for Regular Medicaid, there is no home equity interest limit.

While one’s home is generally exempt from Medicaid’s asset limit, it is not exempt from Medicaid’s Estate Recovery Program. Following a long-term care Medicaid beneficiary’s death, Florida’s Medicaid agency attempts reimbursement of care costs through whatever estate of the deceased still remains. This is often the home. Without proper planning strategies in place, the home will be used to reimburse Medicaid for providing care rather than going to family as inheritance.

----------

This is a fairly succinct look at income limits.  It was higher than what I thought.  

Wish you all the best with this.  Government agencies are so fun to deal with, I'm sure!

Randy


 Thank you for all this!

Post: Give me your advice

Max BellinoPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Massachusetts
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 15
Quote from @Randall Alan:

@Max Bellino

So, not to rain on your parade... but if your thought process around the government supporting your grandmother is centered on Medicaid, you are going to be out of luck.  Medicaid does a 5 year look-back as to assets in her name to specifically exclude patients who gift their assets to qualify for Medicaid. So if that is the case, it won't even matter if you sell the asset, as it would be seen as an asset of hers for the next 5 years (or the proceeds would be seen as hers if it was sold).

Here is a link that has more details:

https://www.medicaidplanningas... 

Otherwise, the easiest thing to do is to have a cosigner on the loan to get you over the age & income hump.  You can manage it, etc, and just let it ride in whomever's names until you could eventually refinance the property into yours when you have more income.  You would just need to coordinate on depreciation and such if you were filing taxes separately.  I imagine there is a way for you to split the deductions & such if needed - or one person could take them all, but a CPA could speak to that better.  It is highly likely you will want to refinance it anyway down the road because you will be buying it at a fairly high interest rate in today's rate environment if the first issue of Medicaid doesn't scrap the deal to begin with.

She could still sell the house and then use the funds to pay for her care... so the house can still stay in the family's name though.

Wish you all the best!

Randy



No, from what I understand because my grandmother is selling it at the tax assessed value. She will get the 460k that the sate will dwindle down
eventually. So when they do the look back they see she sold it at a price where they can't come after us/her.  I can't answer confidently as most of the info is from my attorney. It's been tricky to get through the weeds you could say.

Post: Give me your advice

Max BellinoPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Massachusetts
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 15
Quote from @Randall Alan:
Quote from @Konstantin Ginzburg:

I'm a little confused as to why she needs to sell the property to meet the state's requirements. Since the property is fully paid off and is owned by her, she should have the ability to do whatever she wants with the property whether its a seller finance or simply signing an Articles of Transference to legally transfer the title to another member of the family. If she needs a certain amount of capital to pay for her treatment from the state, then that is another matter. If you haven't found any financers who are willing to finance the deal as is, then you should just continue to call around to different lenders until you find one that is willing to work with you. Try to go to local lenders as opposed to national chains, from my experience local lenders are more willing to come up with other financing measures rather than 30 year fixed rated standard loans. Try to ask for FHA or DSCR loans to see if they are willing to offer those.

 @Konstantin Ginzburg

The OP has not clarified, but from the nature of the post, I am making a presumption that they want to get the grandmother qualified for (Federal) Medicaid.  Medicaid is sort of the medical insurance of last resort for the poor.  You are only allowed to have assets totaling $2,000 to $3,000... PERIOD.  So if you own a home, or anything else of value (there are a few exceptions) you do not qualify for Medicaid.   The idea  is that you could sell your assets and pay for your healthcare coverage yourself.  

It appears the OP wants to get the house out of his grandmother's name so that she would qualify for Medicaid.  I was saying that the Medicaid program does a 5 year lookback for any assets, so the idea of selling the house will not accomplish the objective of getting her on Medicaid (if that is actually what he is attempting to do

Randy


 Yes exactly. Thanks Randy.  

Quote from @Erle Thompson:
Quote from @Max Bellino:

Background:

My grandmother who is unfortunately needing full-time living care owns a three-family property and because she has this care now the state could take the property. My grandmother would want the asset to stay in the family and so do my parents so, they are trying to kick start my real estate investor career. I have enough money for the deposit, closing and could even start to fix it up. I would like to own this property in my own name and I would rather not have a co-applicant because they are already giving me so much help from selling the house at the tax-assessed value so the state can stay out of this.

The deal:
The cost of purchase is(tax assessed value): 460K
The appraised value is(from my dad trying to refinance but fell through with grandmother's credit): 650K
Rental income: 4.5k monthly (under market rent so with money to fix up the units could get 5.2-5.5k)
The home is fully paid off but we can't do seller finance because the state needs their money so my grandmother can be fully supported by the state.

The issue:
The issue is I don't show a stable income because I am 19 years old. And another smaller issue is my income being 40k a year and with the 70% of the rental income; I would barely squeeze by. Although, I have great credit (760) but all the mortgage brokers I talk to all say the same thing about those two issues! I know this could be a great investment if I could just get a loan!
Any advice is appreciated!

 Many options, here are a couple:

-You could have her transfer it to a trust- say to the benefit of her kids or grand kids or whoever. Then you buy it from the trust either for seller financing, or conventional with a small seller carry back. Potential cuts the state our completely?

- Taking on a partner or co-signer is not that big a risk if done well. If you found someone who has done rentals before then you could actually benefit and learn from them on the transaction. and you probably would not need to give away to much of the deal, especially if you already have the down payment. And could be a good BRRRR where you cash them out in a refi in a year or 2.

- If the state has not yet taken the house, or started the process then you could still do seller finance for some or all, and the state can shove it. If this has to do with her not having an ongoing income then that could still be an issue though.

- Your grandma could 'gift' some or all of the house to 1 or many people. as an example she gifts 10 family members 10K or 1% of the house and the amount you pay at the sale goes to her costs/ the government. then the other family members are the seller financing for the rest.

There are many unknowns in your situation, so these may or may not apply. Either way you should consult an attorney and CPA to help set any of these up and verify they are legit, but I would think it would be worth the cost, if only for the education of what is possible.


 Thanks for the advice. I will talk to my attorney about some of these. Thanks you!

Quote from @Henry Clark:

Don’t do anything.  The state and fed “will” go back through all her records and look for any asset or cash transfers minimum of two years.  Those funds will need to be returned to her account. Even if whoever received them loses money.  

Go talk with an assisted living provider and pose your question.  And timing.  All her assets up to $2,000 used up first before government pays.  

Is she mentally capable?  Is there a power of attorney?  Any relative or debtor can challenge if this is not in place.

No, from what I understand because my grandmother is selling it at the tax assessed value. She will get the 460k that the sate will take eventually. She really isn't mentally capable but these questions I can't answer confidently as most of the info is from my attorney. It's been tricky to get through the weeds you could say.

Post: Give me your advice

Max BellinoPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Massachusetts
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 15

Background:

My grandmother who is unfortunately needing full-time living care owns a three-family property and because she has the care now the state could take the property. My grandmother would want the asset to stay in the family and so do my parents so, they are trying to kick start my real estate investor career. I have enough money for the deposit, closing and could even start to fix it up. I would like to own this property in my own name and I would rather not have a co-applicant because they are already giving me so much help from selling the house at the tax-assessed value so the state can stay out of this.

The deal:

The cost of purchase is(tax assessed value): 460K

The appraised value is(from my dad trying to refinance but fell through with grandmother's credit): 650K

Rental income: 4.5k monthly (under market rent so with money to fix up the units could get 5.2-5.5k)

The home is fully paid off but we can't do seller finance because the state needs their money so my grandmother can be fully supported by the state.

The issue:

The issue is I don't show a stable income because I am 19 years old. And another smaller issue is my income being 40k a year and with the 70% of the rental income; I would barely squeeze by. Although, I have great credit (760) but all the mortgage brokers I talk to all say the same thing about those two issues! I know this could be a great investment if I could just get a loan!

Any advice is appreciated!

Happy to connect with anyone! Would love to hop on a call anytime!