Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Max Bellino

Max Bellino has started 8 posts and replied 24 times.

Post: Online Cost Seg studies Vs Site Visits

Max BellinoPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Massachusetts
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 15

Hey Everyone,

I hope everyone is having a great holiday season! I’m looking for guidance on whether it’s worth opting for a rapid report for a cost segregation study, which is less expensive than a full site visit. What are the pros and cons? Does it still provide effective results? Also, can anyone recommend a reliable company for this? I’m planning to do this for 3 multifamily properties all located in MA, each ranging from 2 to 4 units. Any advice would be much appreciated! Thank you!

Post: Creative Deal Analysis

Max BellinoPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Massachusetts
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 15

https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/15-Windle-Ave-North-Graft...

Hey Guys, 

I’m working on a deal that’s a bit complicated due to the subdivision of land, and I’m having trouble accurately comping the subdivided parcels. Does anyone have advice on how to approach this or know of a good broker specializing in vacant residential land?

Here’s my thinking so far: the property’s been on the market for over a year, and I know they had an offer for $500K. I’m considering coming in with an offer around $600K to $650K with seller financing and setting balloon payments once the land is sold. My goal is to get the single-family house and warehouse for around $400K, which would value the land at $250K across three lots. So after the land is sold have the last balloon payment to get a loan on the new lot with the less land. 

(Lot's are roughly going to be .5 of a acer in north Grafton Ma)

I do have a few concerns: one lot has a FEMA line running through it, two lots are next to a railway, and the terrain is hilly. I haven't toured the single-family home yet, but it likely needs work, and the warehouse would as well. I estimate the house could rent for $2.8K–$3K, while the warehouse might rent for (one unit) $2K–$4K, depending on how much work it needs to suit different tenants. So with another 100K in construction/fix up cost bringing the total to 500K it meets the 1% rule, obviously I would do more underwriting but I need to be solid on those comps.

Any thoughts or advice on this strategy? Or know anyone who specializes in land brokerage. Do you think it's worth my time to get this warehouse hack for free?

Best,

Bobo

Post: Short Term Rental Loans

Max BellinoPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Massachusetts
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 15
Quote from @James K.:

Hi all, I'm thinking about getting into the STR market. Just wondering about how to acquire a STR loan. I'm assuming it will be a DCSR type loan. Is there anyone who could recommend a lender? I'm based out central Mass.

Thanks in advance,

Jim


 Hey Jim, 

I'm pretty local in the Worcester area. I have had good luck with Millbury National Bank, they are pretty old school and if they like your deal they will most likely lend at 15% down. The down side is the higher rate .5-2% above prime depending on deal and your financials. Good Luck, let me know if you would like to try a DSCR lender, I have two but unsure if they would do something like this.

Best,
Max   

Post: Anderson Business Advisers Asset Protection

Max BellinoPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Massachusetts
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 15
Quote from @Sebastian Bennett:
Quote from @Max Bellino:
Quote from @Stuart Udis:

@Max Bellino You seem eager to learn and I hope you accept this as constructive criticism. I read through your posts and it shows a true lack of understanding of asset protection and the rationale for forming any of the structures you proposed. With your current knowledge base you are not in the position to determine the "shortcomings" of any law firm or come to the conclusion they possess a " lack genuine expertise". Perhaps not the best example, but  what you are doing is no different than a medical patient who walks into 6 doctors offices with a broken finger asking to be treated with radiation. Of course the doctor is going to recommend a different treatment plan given radiation is not appropriate. You are the patient who is adamant (incorrectly) that radiation is the correct treatment plan and are out there looking for the doctor who will prescribe this even though its the incorrect course of action. If they have other suggestions, they are incorrectly labeled as having "shortcomings". As I said in my earlier post, trust the professionals. Not only attorneys, but accountants, architects and other professional service providers. There's a lot of bad information available online and its not prudent to rely on most of what you read. I suspect you've fallen victim to this. 


Yes, I agree with you. I've encountered misinformation from a couple of firms which is why I called it "shortcomings". When I talked about something I learned from one firm, another firm said that it was completely wrong, so this is why I'm trying to gather as much information as possible before making a decision. It's concerning to receive different answers from different firms because it's hard to know which one is right. As a client, I need to trust a service that I don't have much knowledge about.

Wow, I give up on this thread.....you completely missed the point of Stuart's post. You really should re-read what he wrote. He is not talking about the law firms you interviewed!



Instead of suggesting that people give up, why not offer them help next time?

Post: Anderson Business Advisers Asset Protection

Max BellinoPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Massachusetts
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 15
Quote from @Sebastian Bennett:
Quote from @Max Bellino:
Quote from @Stuart Udis:

@Max Bellino You seem eager to learn and I hope you accept this as constructive criticism. I read through your posts and it shows a true lack of understanding of asset protection and the rationale for forming any of the structures you proposed. With your current knowledge base you are not in the position to determine the "shortcomings" of any law firm or come to the conclusion they possess a " lack genuine expertise". Perhaps not the best example, but  what you are doing is no different than a medical patient who walks into 6 doctors offices with a broken finger asking to be treated with radiation. Of course the doctor is going to recommend a different treatment plan given radiation is not appropriate. You are the patient who is adamant (incorrectly) that radiation is the correct treatment plan and are out there looking for the doctor who will prescribe this even though its the incorrect course of action. If they have other suggestions, they are incorrectly labeled as having "shortcomings". As I said in my earlier post, trust the professionals. Not only attorneys, but accountants, architects and other professional service providers. There's a lot of bad information available online and its not prudent to rely on most of what you read. I suspect you've fallen victim to this. 


Yes, I agree with you. I've encountered misinformation from a couple of firms which is why I called it "shortcomings". When I talked about something I learned from one firm, another firm said that it was completely wrong, so this is why I'm trying to gather as much information as possible before making a decision. It's concerning to receive different answers from different firms because it's hard to know which one is right. As a client, I need to trust a service that I don't have much knowledge about.

Wow, I give up on this thread.....you completely missed the point of Stuart's post. You really should re-read what he wrote. He is not talking about the law firms you interviewed!


I get what Stuart is saying. If I ask different lawyers, I'll get different answers. But my problem is, sometimes when I tell them what other lawyers said, they tell me it's wrong (meaning on the legal side..nothing to do with stucture). That's why I'm trying to figure out who's right and who's wrong. I also understand now that making a holding company LLC in Delaware, like he said, is making things too complicated. Thanks for your input.

Post: Anderson Business Advisers Asset Protection

Max BellinoPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Massachusetts
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 15
Quote from @Sebastian Bennett:
Quote from @Stuart Udis:

@Max Bellino You seem eager to learn and I hope you accept this as constructive criticism. I read through your posts and it shows a true lack of understanding of asset protection and the rationale for forming any of the structures you proposed. With your current knowledge base you are not in the position to determine the "shortcomings" of any law firm or come to the conclusion they possess a " lack genuine expertise". Perhaps not the best example, but  what you are doing is no different than a medical patient who walks into 6 doctors offices with a broken finger asking to be treated with radiation. Of course the doctor is going to recommend a different treatment plan given radiation is not appropriate. You are the patient who is adamant (incorrectly) that radiation is the correct treatment plan and are out there looking for the doctor who will prescribe this even though its the incorrect course of action. If they have other suggestions, they are incorrectly labeled as having "shortcomings". As I said in my earlier post, trust the professionals. Not only attorneys, but accountants, architects and other professional service providers. There's a lot of bad information available online and its not prudent to rely on most of what you read. I suspect you've fallen victim to this. 


 Lol post of the day!



Could you please provide details on what knowledge I lack in asset protection and point out the specific areas where I may be mistaken? Thank you.

Post: Anderson Business Advisers Asset Protection

Max BellinoPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Massachusetts
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 15
Quote from @Stuart Udis:

@Max Bellino You seem eager to learn and I hope you accept this as constructive criticism. I read through your posts and it shows a true lack of understanding of asset protection and the rationale for forming any of the structures you proposed. With your current knowledge base you are not in the position to determine the "shortcomings" of any law firm or come to the conclusion they possess a " lack genuine expertise". Perhaps not the best example, but  what you are doing is no different than a medical patient who walks into 6 doctors offices with a broken finger asking to be treated with radiation. Of course the doctor is going to recommend a different treatment plan given radiation is not appropriate. You are the patient who is adamant (incorrectly) that radiation is the correct treatment plan and are out there looking for the doctor who will prescribe this even though its the incorrect course of action. If they have other suggestions, they are incorrectly labeled as having "shortcomings". As I said in my earlier post, trust the professionals. Not only attorneys, but accountants, architects and other professional service providers. There's a lot of bad information available online and its not prudent to rely on most of what you read. I suspect you've fallen victim to this. 


Yes, I agree with you. I've encountered misinformation from a couple of firms which is why I called it "shortcomings". When I talked about something I learned from one firm, another firm said that it was completely wrong, so this is why I'm trying to gather as much information as possible before making a decision. It's concerning to receive different answers from different firms because it's hard to know which one is right. As a client, I need to trust a service that I don't have much knowledge about.

Post: Anderson Business Advisers Asset Protection

Max BellinoPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Massachusetts
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 15
Quote from @Stuart Udis:

@Max Bellino The take away from my first post was to trust the legal professionals who will prioritize what’s important and put you on the right path. Your follow up message coupled with the fact you already reached out to 6 law firm tells me you are not only over complicating this process but also looking to collect free legal advice. You will get much further in this business trusting and paying professionals. That’s how you build meaningful relationships who will add real value. This doesn’t merely apply to real estate this applies to any business endeavor you pursue. 


For me, making the best decision is crucial. Collecting free but potentially inaccurate advice when I can only somewhat afford to pay hourly rates for an attorneys, some of whom may not even possess adequate knowledge, seems impractical. It's surprising to uncover the shortcomings of certain firms that lack genuine expertise. Perhaps I could be mistaken, but I believe diving into a relationship without fully comprehending it myself could result in unnecessary expenses if the relationship turns out to be wrong. Therefore, while I acknowledge the necessity of investing in a relationship, I want to gather as much information as possible and make the most informed decision possible.

Post: Anderson Business Advisers Asset Protection

Max BellinoPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Massachusetts
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 15
Quote from @Account Closed:
Quote from @Max Bellino:

Hello Everyone,

Thank you for taking the time to read my post. I'm currently navigating the complex process of finding a reputable asset protection attorney with expertise in real estate. My journey has introduced me to the strategies promoted by Anderson Business Advisers. While I'm open to investing in quality service, the feedback I've encountered suggests that Anderson may not deliver on its promises. It appears to be that their focus might lean more towards collecting money rather than providing substantial support and outcomes. I'm particularly interested in establishing a holding company that is a Multi-Member LLC with charging order protection so looking to place it in Delaware. Although I would like to try to do it myself, crafting effective operating agreements is outside my comfort zone. I have talked to 6 different attorneys from a variety of firms (including Anderson), my priority remains to use a firm that is committed to delivering real value and doing the strategies I'm looking for, correctly. Any advice or recommendations would be warmly welcomed.

Thank you!

~Max Bellino

How many properties do you currently own?


10, but the emphasis lies in distributing the liability of the equity across the LLC's. I've come to realize that opting for a Delaware LLC might be unnecessary at this stage; it seems more fitting for the future when my portfolio experiences significant growth.

Post: Anderson Business Advisers Asset Protection

Max BellinoPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Massachusetts
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 15
Quote from @Chris Seveney:

@Max Bellino

Holding company is really not needed unless you run multiple operational businesses like a property management firm, construction firm etc that you want to roll up into one entity

Having a holding company that holds one company you that owns real estate would have me question what’s the use case?

What are the concerns? What are you trying to prevent ?



I believe that having multiple properties can enhance the performance of each property I own. For instance, if three of my properties are generating significant cash flow and performing well, they can offset any issues that may arise with another property, such as a heating system failure. By centralizing funds through a holding company and allocating them strategically within my portfolio, I can optimize its overall performance.

Moreover, leveraging the tax advantages of this arrangement can significantly simplify matters and yield greater benefits. Additionally, the lending opportunities that arise from banks assessing the equity of the entire portfolio as a cohesive entity are substantial. This holistic approach to portfolio management can yield massive advantages in terms of efficiency and financial leverage.

Furthermore, the liability shield provided by this structure could prove extremely advantageous.