Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Matt Swearingen

Matt Swearingen has started 4 posts and replied 35 times.

Post: Denver couple face felony charge over Airbnb

Matt SwearingenPosted
  • Georgetown, PA
  • Posts 35
  • Votes 19
Thanks for your thoughtful response 

@James Carlson. 


Not arguing, just a counter point: Housing/rental shortages are almost always caused by zoning laws and restrictive building codes that make it difficult or even impossible for developers to add to the supply of units in a growing demand area.

Often established property owners in the area fight FOR these codes to keep the competition from driving down the rents on their existing buildings.  They're creating a barrier to entry with the help of local politicians, no room for corruption there I'm sure.

Grant Cardone even offers advice on how to buy properties in areas like this.

So the government creates the problem and then rides to the rescue to solve it?

Sydney (a growing metro) got their housing costs down, by making it easier to build more housing. Supply and demand, imagine that.

Sorry for the cynicism. Not directed at the posters here of course, merely the situation. 

Originally posted by @James Carlson:

@Matt Swearingen

I don't mind the question at all. It's a good one. 

I think some people think regulations are bad. Period. End of story. For me, I weigh the intrusion of government oversight with the intended goal of alleviating a societal problem. I think housing affordability is a serious issue, and a few studies -- here and here, to name a few -- show that an increase in short-term rentals leads to a decrease in long-term rentals. (Economics tell me fewer LTRs equals higher rent prices.)

For some people, the calculus might lead them to say the intrusion is not worth the small exacerbation of the housing affordability problem in Denver. For me, it does. I think unfettered markets result in yawning inequality. I don't want an outright ban, just small measures. A primary residence rule, or even a primary residence + one STR type of rule seem reasonable.

I can see the other side. I just don't fall into that camp. 

Post: Denver couple face felony charge over Airbnb

Matt SwearingenPosted
  • Georgetown, PA
  • Posts 35
  • Votes 19

"I don't have a problem with STR regulation"

@James carlson

May I ask, why not? Not looking for a flame war or competing political diatribes. 

I just don't understand why investors (even left leaning ones) are so indifferent to the state telling you what you may and may not do with your property. Why let them have more power?

For those who would argue that 'Denver doesn't want investors bidding up property values' or 'short term rentals cause problems' I would say: When does government picking winners and losers or price controls ever work?  This restriction will just create unnecessary externalities that serve no one.

Someone made the comment that the sharing economy is the wild west. That's a good thing. Look how much wealth and value for customers was created in such a short time. Property owners get vetted tenants and the collection and marketing services of airbnb, the tenants get vetted places to stay and a rating system for the properties. What's not to like?

Post: Lack of qualified applicants

Matt SwearingenPosted
  • Georgetown, PA
  • Posts 35
  • Votes 19

@cassi justiz 

If you don't want a PM and you're struggling with finding tenants: have a successful, local real estate agent find you tenants.

They will be able to tell you the quality of competing units and the pool of available renters and then go find who you want. Then there's no long term commitment like with a PM, just a one time commission.

You can't be an ace at everything, find the people who are and learn from them.

@Nicholas Morgan

If you feel you MUST have this duplex and it's truly worth $112k to you then the other option is to get the owner to agree to close at $92k with the FHA loan and then get him to carry the paper for $20k over 5 years at 5% interest as an unsecured loan.

If you structure it right your payments won't be much more than a $112k FHA loan and everybody gets what they want.

Standard disclaimer: paying more than appraised value is rarely if ever a "good deal". 

Check with your loan officer whether that's legal or not with FHA.

You should be able to have someone manually underwrite the mortgage if his income is really high enough. 

Post: Very Rural Properties

Matt SwearingenPosted
  • Georgetown, PA
  • Posts 35
  • Votes 19

@John Davis

I know a rural investor from my hometown with 40+ doors. The guy runs a roofing business, can't even turn on a computer and does mortgage amortization tables in his head. Also he's a multi millionaire. He and his wife always drive brand new model year cadillacs.

The key to rural investing is find a  good school district. For people that like rural living good schools are hard to find.  With a more limited pool of rentals it isn't hard to have the nicest ones in the area. Then you can be selective about tenants. 

If you must invest in rural areas I would suggest you look into flips and mobile home parkCadillac. Flips are easier to get into because houses take longer to move with lower population density.

Check the county's census results and see if the area is growing or shrinking. Some rural areas are just dying, so not good for long term plays. 

The best rural locations are unincorporated townships that are close driving distance to jobs and stores. The property taxes are lower than the burbs 5 miles away, with less regulation. You'll find random outcroppings of "McMansions" in plans where a developer bought a farmer's field at auction (usually when he passes) and put in a bunch of cookie cutter yuppie houses.

What is the goal of your investing? Do you just want financial freedom? Maximum returns? Find out your goals and your "why". Then see if rural investing fits your goals. It might not be worth it and driving to Greensboro might be the right answer for you.

Post: How to analyse a deal with insufficient data

Matt SwearingenPosted
  • Georgetown, PA
  • Posts 35
  • Votes 19

Submitted an offer letter with a Master Lease with Option to Purchase. Payments were $50/paying tenant/month. Purchase was in year 5 for $200k.

Offer letter was detailed and described my reasoning for the offer and had a picture of the family and kids on it (play to the audience).

Offer was refused. I set a 1 month reminder on my Google Calendar to resubmit the same offer. I'm betting they won't get any more than $200k. 

Post: How to analyse a deal with insufficient data

Matt SwearingenPosted
  • Georgetown, PA
  • Posts 35
  • Votes 19
Originally posted by @Richard W.:
Originally posted by @Matt Swearingen:

For anyone following along at home. 

They want $289 for the 13 acres, might offer $100.

Yes, Im interested to see your DD unfold, please consider updating this thread. 

So the township called me yesterday and had a nice chat. They haven't paid their $25/lot permit fees in 2 years. They will only ever be allowed 18 lots on that property because the DEP deemed the flat space below the park to be wetland. So the max gross rents from the park will be $315x18 = $5,670/month (tenant owned homes).

If I paid sticker $289k that's the 1.9% rule. I don't plan to pay anywhere near that.

Post: How to analyse a deal with insufficient data

Matt SwearingenPosted
  • Georgetown, PA
  • Posts 35
  • Votes 19

For anyone following along at home. I viewed the property today and the results were predictable. The owners were both in their 80's and the husband who ran the place died in August 2017. All the information about the park died with him. They had next to no data available. 12 lots had homes on them (out of 30 available). "We don't do leases."

"How many people are actually paying?" 

"Some of them, I think.

The SFH on the premises was built in 1800 and was occupied by the owner's deadbeat son. It was condemnable, I wouldn't store tools in it.

This looked like a bulldozer special. Just start completely over. 

They want $289 for the 13 acres, might offer $100.

Post: How to analyse a deal with insufficient data

Matt SwearingenPosted
  • Georgetown, PA
  • Posts 35
  • Votes 19

Agree on the 'can't beat the IRS' sentiment, I think that was the realtor's excuse. Will definitely request leases. 

Also contacted the township about the cost of permitting new pads, if they even allow it. If I could cash flow from day one and increase revenues by adding pads this could be a good investment.