Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Matt Nettles

Matt Nettles has started 15 posts and replied 51 times.

@Gaspare U. According to Tim Bratz... he does 100% of value adding and refinances and returns 100% of investor capital no later than 24 months on all of his deals and then holds them for a longer period than a typical syndication but he owns 80-90% of the deal after the refi

@Gaspare U.

I’ve heard it on many podcasts but this was the most recent video I watched where he explains how he structures the deals.. see link below

https://youtu.be/xZsjIhV4BHA

Ordinarily a syndication is heavy ownership % on the LP side .. for example 80% LP 20% GP with or without preferred return.

My question is and I ask because I heard Podcast where Tim Bratz structures all of his deals this way:

He offers 8-12% pref with a 100% LP 0% GP split until refinance and then ownership flips.. LP 10-20% and GP 80-90%

Just want to get opinions or feedback on if you think this deal structure is more effective or does it just depend on the particular deal.

His whole belief is he does not get paid until all value has been added and he refi’s and returns 100% of investor capital back to LP’s

@Ben Leybovich that is a fantastic example. I’ve never thought of it like that. I am most definitely the 2nd option of the two as this is my avenue for creating wealth. Thank you for taking the time to help. I really appreciate you

@Tj Hines TJ I can always count on you to lend a helping hand brother. Thank you once again for your input. Every bit of it is being noted

@Jordan Barta all great ideas Jordan. I have heard many investors say they do not like open and empty space on their property because it could be put to use

@Dan Heuschele Hey Dan. Thank you for taking the time to provide input. It has all been noted. I agree that value add model is the way to go

@Chris Salerno Hey Chris.. thank you for your help my friend. I agree that the best route to maximize ROI is the value add play. However, I was curious to get opinions of others like yourself that are way more knowledgeable and experienced than myself. Much appreciated

@Greg Dickerson all great points Greg. Thank you sir

@Danny Randazzo thanks for the input Danny. I appreciate you taking the time to help seriously. It means a lot