Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Matthew Gentile

Matthew Gentile has started 5 posts and replied 87 times.

Post: Realtors Association agrees to settlement to eliminate fixed fees

Matthew GentilePosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Worcester, MA
  • Posts 88
  • Votes 52
Quote from @Carlos Ptriawan:
Quote from @Matthew Gentile:
Quote from @Jack Seiden:
Quote from @JD Martin:
Quote from @Russell Brazil:

 but he decided he would rather have my business and make less than get no money, I suspect many realtor will follow that same logic.


 Definitely agree you can't predict what will happen, but I feel the risk of inexperienced home buyers going unrepresented could cost far more in the long run if the deal isn't straight-forward. High lawyer hourly on a

What is the percentage of home transaction that's messy and not straight-forward ?

We are in 3 DOM market, These days even Owner / inexperienced buyers are super aggressive, I saw lot of broken homes are bought by owner occupant and not by flipper , if they don't care about all these mess/possibility to sue, then the job of buyer agent is simply a Docusign transaction exchanger.  

With this ruling there's possibility for buyer to contact seller agent  and deal directly. And seller has more space to negotiate because of lowered commision/no buyer agent/dual agent.


 I'm a wholesaler so every deal is messy haha, but I have agent experience that lets me solve those problems. That a first time home buyer probably wouldn't get through at least not without a decent struggle. Comes down to price/comfort, is the going rate to have everything done for you whether it be menial or not 5-6% of the transaction? Maybe, maybe not. I do it myself because I dislike having others do it for me. 

Not sure what the % of non-straight foward deals is at present, inventory is too low to matter like you mentioned. But it won't be too low forever and it'll be interesting to see how this all develops. 

Post: Realtors Association agrees to settlement to eliminate fixed fees

Matthew GentilePosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Worcester, MA
  • Posts 88
  • Votes 52
Quote from @James Hamling:
Quote from @Russell Brazil:
Quote from @V.G Jason:

It's incredibly hard to tell what will happen.

I do think we see a slight uptick in listings, but it's hard to decipher how much of that is from this ruling. This will consolidate a lot of the real estate teams & agents, you'll see some systematic models and approaches being created like ala carte online tools that you pay as you go with it for a buyer. I just don't see how the entry home buyer is going to be able to overcome this, this is just now another hurdle. Or am I off?

The buyer doesnt have to overcome that hurdle. The commission will simply be included in each offer, as opposed to listed on the MLS.


 In less than 24hrs there is articles coming out from Real Estate know-nothings reporting on it declaring there "knowing" on how this will so radically change things, with a narrative as if buyer agency just magically became free, lol. 

I have seen major news outlet's with articles saying things as dumb as now real estate transactions will cost only 1-2% in total, lol. 

So for those not in the know, in simplest terms what was just done is the function between sellers and buyers has been severed. So now, each side must work more independent of the other. Meaning listing a home for sale will require MORE actions, efforts, energy, intelligence.     And a buyers agent will have to also do MORE, be smarter, more experienced, intelligent, AND will have to integrate direct billing. 

That = MORE expense, not less. More = MORE, not less. 

Less buyers = more work to get the buyers. And the childish notion that prices will plumet is ignorant of fact of sellers CHOICE on what price is worth it to sell at. If sellers don't get a worth-it price, THEY DONT SELL, it's just not complicated people. Less homes for sale does not reduce prices, it holds them UP. 

Novice agent's who don't have the chop's for negotiations, who don't comprehend how to negotiate seller concession, there gone baby GONE! So less agent's. Again, less does NOT = cheaper. 

And my personal funniest one I read, on how the various discount/flat-fee brokers are gonna win, LMAO. There gonna loose the MOST. There done, this is an extinction level event for discount/flat-fee brokers because there discounted system was reliant on an ocean of ready buyers/buyer agents bringing buyers because that's literally how they could be discount, they just listed on MLS, did the bare minimum.

Now, in a world where listing agent's are doing way more, spending more, interacting more with more people, namely unrepresented buyers, it's not gonna be some big fire-sale of listing fee's. 

End of day I see it as a change of some paperwork and that's about it, at least for me. How I do listings changes very minimally, because I already did most of what this change will require.    Biggest change will be intaking a lot more unrepresented buyer inquiries and thus a lot higher % of dual agency transactions. 

And that alone, dual agency, scares the hell out of 50%+ of retail brokers/agents because they are not of the professional level. 

I see a LOT of novice agent's leave and being shown the door, because there scared, not up to the job, or brokers have no faith that agent ___ won't mess up dual agency so there not worth the risk.     For me that's going to be my #1 biggest change, adding in new scrutiny that agents are NOT allowed to act alone or as primary on transaction until they can prove mastery of dual agency. 


 It is amazing to see how many articles come out stating what "WILL" happen from folks who probably used an agent and sung their praises on their own transactions. Fits the digital age well. 

I agree with your take James. I read an article where NAR was "expecting over 1million of the 2million active agents" to be leaving the industry. If true, definitely doesn't lower the price tag on a good professional agent, and even if it did, they would make up for it in the ability to generate new upfront fees. I think you'll be spot on with a paperwork change and the offers containing the commission rate, seems like the least painful way to move forward.

Post: Realtors Association agrees to settlement to eliminate fixed fees

Matthew GentilePosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Worcester, MA
  • Posts 88
  • Votes 52
Quote from @Jack Seiden:
Quote from @JD Martin:
Quote from @Russell Brazil:

Actually youll likely see upward pressure on commissions due to this settlement. I mentioned this in an Axios article I was interviewed for just last month


 That's exactly what I think is going to happen as well. Good agents aren't going to work for nothing, and buyer's agents will probably either switch to a combo system (upfront plus commission) or higher rates. Yes, the worst agents will be advertising some low fees on their end. 

The thing that makes me laugh the most is the idea that home prices will modulate. If that were true there would already be a booming market FSBO. In reality all that will happen is any fees not taken by the agent & broker will just become part of the seller's profit.

I could be wrong, I honestly think this is such a systemic change that it’s hard to predict the ripples, but I find it extraordinary hard to believe this doesn’t lead to a substantial reduction in commissions, I’m literally taking with a client in an hour, I like the guy, I suspect he may be a repeat customer and I’m not gonna take any chance I lose him over a few dollars, so I’ll negotiate with him, I suspect other agents will take the same approach, especially given the real risk buyers just walk and go unrepresented, whether that’s a good idea or not l, it will happen. I was getting a quote for a roof a few weeks ago and the owner of the company called me and told me I just want you ti know we want your business & if you get a lower bid, we will match it, now the area I’m investing doesn’t have a glut of roofers or anything but he decided he would rather have my business and make less than get no money, I suspect many realtor will follow that same logic.

 Definitely agree you can't predict what will happen, but I feel the risk of inexperienced home buyers going unrepresented could cost far more in the long run if the deal isn't straight-forward. High lawyer hourly on a messy drawn out deal and similarly agents taking lower commissions and pushing volume under the new model to make the same amount of money may be detrimental to buyers with more out of pocket fees (pay per showing, pay per offer, etc), versus being able to finance the brokerage costs. 

Will be interesting to see how price reflects the new system whether there is any change or not. I imagine the "work-arounds" for this new system will be plentiful. My opinion anyway.

Post: 2nd Property strategy, little equity... what should I do

Matthew GentilePosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Worcester, MA
  • Posts 88
  • Votes 52


Hi Sammy,

Glad to see you taking steps in your real estate investing career, it helps to get reps in and learn.

As for what you should do, your title states that you have "little equity", does that mean there is little equity in the Florida property or you have little available for another equity investment.

I'd caution a refi with little equity, as stability in the early stages of your investment career is crucial to long-term success, try not to over extend yourself and potentially end up behind.

Having access to investors and partners is the name of the game for scaling and limited funds, if you have access to investor capital, working with a wholesaler to acquire a flip may be a good option just be mindful of the risks of as-is properties and having investor capital at risk. 

Double and triple check your purchase price with your renovation and holding costs and try to hit a single rather than a homerun to start. Try for cosmetic over a foundation repair. 

Hope that is helpful!

Post: SFH versus MFH?

Matthew GentilePosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Worcester, MA
  • Posts 88
  • Votes 52
Quote from @Chris Plummer:

Location, location and location. I would recommend both in a portfolio. If you can grab a small SFH in a hot metro area those are gold and should continue to scale year over year, thosea are few and harder to come by. A smaller footprint less maintenance and repair costs with high rent and low vacancy is a great formula for success. MFH will always out perform SFM in most other cases simple math. If the average SFM is say 300k and you can buy a quad at 600k your average price per door is 150k.

The other comments regarding vacancy expenses etc are also accurate. 

Cheers!

 @Chris Plummer

Thanks for sharing Chris, I agree with everything you mentioned. The numbers would have to be scrutinized pretty heavily for the SFH, especially in some hot areas. I'd imagine the price per door could be equated to the price per bedroom in some hotter SFH areas. Definitely comes down to buying right. I feel like value-added opportunities would be easier in SFH over MFH for resales because families would purchase SFH differently from MFH which could be something to keep in mind in the long run as a safety net if you needed to sell because renting wasn't sufficient.

Post: SFH versus MFH?

Matthew GentilePosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Worcester, MA
  • Posts 88
  • Votes 52
Quote from @Bradley Buxton:

@Matthew Gentile

We work with clients that chose both as a mix in the Reno, NV area. Both SFH and MFH have pros and cons. SFH are more available, affordable, and sellable because of higher demand and larger market pool of buyers making SFH more liquid. You can diversify your portfolio with multiple SFH. However, if you lose a tenant, you lose all income.

MFH are more costly and  in most markets scarce, and can be harder to sell because of the limited buyer pool. But they provide steady income even with vacancies. The downside is more maintenance and repairs, more toilets, stoves, water heaters etc...

Depending on what your goals are for the investments and your acquisition strategy would point you toward one asset class or another.  You also don't have to stick with one or another. Mix and match depending on your ultimate goal and plan.

@Bradley Buxton

Thanks for the insight! In MA all you typically hear about is MFH which is like you said scarce in some areas, we definitely have a surplus here so it makes sense to hear more about them and the benefits. I have just never heard anyone make the case in favor of SFH.

The only time I typically hear about SFH rentals in MA is rent by bedroom near colleges and universities. But I imagine larger families that rent might be more interested in SFH as well. Definitely something I'll be looking into as I am developing a wholesaling operation focused around flippers and SFH for now. But I agree couldn't hurt to mix and match a portfolio.

Post: 25 Year Old with 500K in liquid Cash. Wanting to build duplex - all the way to quad

Matthew GentilePosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Worcester, MA
  • Posts 88
  • Votes 52
Quote from @Jacob Hancock:
Quote from @Matthew Gentile:
Quote from @Account Closed:
Quote from @Jacob Hancock:
Hi everyone,
I have a chunk of money I am wanting to put into real estate. I am wanting to get some advice on what to do. I do not currently own any investment real estate.

My question is, with the cash that I have what would be the best route to go? Duplex, triplex, or even quadplex?
*how much is the costs to build each of these?
                    - ideally I would like to do two bed two bath or maybe even one. not opposed to 3 bed two bath.
I would like to build new.
-I have good connections with a local contractor that could do it. Mind you on these I would use mini splits.

secondly, would you recommend a barndomenium style, brick with vinyl siding, or all vinyl?
Im not scared to leverage but on my first investment I would like to do half down to limit risk and build more knowledge before I started leveraging more.

any tips or ideas are most certainly welcome. Thank you so much guys. Best, Jake


@Jacob Hancock: Listen bub, if you can accumulate $500,000 cash by the time you're 25, you don't need us. We'll just slow you down. Just keep doing what you've been doing and you'll be fine.


 It could also be an inheritance Mike


It is 100% self made. But asking and learning never hurts. I definitely do not know everything as a "young" guy.

 In that case, absolutely just continue doing whatever you're doing and I'd recommend investing in a professional already in the space, rather than take on the task yourself. That time dedicated to your current objectives would be better spent. If you can clear that much by that age it is definitely more bang to keep that train rolling. My opinion anyway.

Post: 25 Year Old with 500K in liquid Cash. Wanting to build duplex - all the way to quad

Matthew GentilePosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Worcester, MA
  • Posts 88
  • Votes 52
Quote from @Account Closed:
Quote from @Jacob Hancock:
Hi everyone,
I have a chunk of money I am wanting to put into real estate. I am wanting to get some advice on what to do. I do not currently own any investment real estate.

My question is, with the cash that I have what would be the best route to go? Duplex, triplex, or even quadplex?
*how much is the costs to build each of these?
                    - ideally I would like to do two bed two bath or maybe even one. not opposed to 3 bed two bath.
I would like to build new.
-I have good connections with a local contractor that could do it. Mind you on these I would use mini splits.

secondly, would you recommend a barndomenium style, brick with vinyl siding, or all vinyl?
Im not scared to leverage but on my first investment I would like to do half down to limit risk and build more knowledge before I started leveraging more.

any tips or ideas are most certainly welcome. Thank you so much guys. Best, Jake


@Jacob Hancock: Listen bub, if you can accumulate $500,000 cash by the time you're 25, you don't need us. We'll just slow you down. Just keep doing what you've been doing and you'll be fine.


 It could also be an inheritance Mike

Post: SFH versus MFH?

Matthew GentilePosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Worcester, MA
  • Posts 88
  • Votes 52

Hi All,

I'm curious how current investors feel about SFH versus MFH, I understand SFH is not the best scaling factor for real estate investment, instead I was hoping to see if there is an argument FOR SFH over MFH? (specifically long-term, non-vacation rentals) Would love to hear a discussion on this!

Thanks for sharing your thoughts!

Post: Location, location, location for my rental

Matthew GentilePosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Worcester, MA
  • Posts 88
  • Votes 52

It is a great questions @Taahir Shaikh. One major consideration to take into account would be do the zoning, laws, HOA etc... allow for rentals in that neighborhood. I'm not familiar with Texas so maybe they all do but still something to consider. No one in my experience leasing condos ever cared who owned and who didn't, it doesn't seem to be of any concern in MA.

Good luck to you. I think there is a lot of value for SFH rentals if you find the right deals for sure.