Minneapolis and Saint Paul are both great markets for real estate investing with around 5% average appreciation for the last eight years and steady rent growth of about 3%, you really can't go wrong in the Twin Cities. But which one is better? That depends on your criteria and investment style. There are pros and cons to every market. Here's a few to consider when searching for your first or next deal. Keep in mind that some of these are subjective or anecdotal but this is at least my experience in these markets after helping dozens of investors buy in both cities.
Minneapolis-
✅ Pros:
Larger Economy & Job Market: More Fortune 500 companies and a stronger job base (Target, U.S. Bank, etc.) which attracts a younger, mobile workforce—great for rentals.
Higher Rental Demand: Urban neighborhoods like Uptown, North Loop, and Northeast draw renters, especially millennials and professionals.
Development & Appreciation Potential: More redevelopment projects and transit investments (Green Line, Blue Line extensions). Neighborhoods like North Loop and Powderhorn have seen solid appreciation.
Cultural Amenities: Museums, theaters, dining—makes it appealing to short- and mid-term renters.
Typically more inventory: It seems there's more options to choose from especially in NE, Columbia, Heights, Fridley, Powderhorn, and Longfellow.
❌ Cons:
Regulations: Stricter landlord/tenant regulations and rent control debates. Eviction moratoriums have been slower to lift.
Crime Perception: Certain areas (esp. post-2020) have struggled with crime perception and safety concerns, which may affect renter confidence or insurance costs.
St. Paul-
✅ Pros:
Lower Entry Cost: Slightly more affordable median home prices than Minneapolis. Easier for first-time investors or those looking for cash flow.
More Stable Rental Market: A bit more “family-oriented” and long-term tenant friendly. Less transient renter base = lower turnover.
Historical Homes & Character: Neighborhoods like Mac-Groveland, Summit Hill, and Highland Park offer charming homes that hold value well.
More Predictable Zoning & Rules: Compared to Minneapolis, regulations can be a little more straightforward (though St. Paul has rent control now—more on that below).
Generally Less Competition: Especially since rent control has been the law of the land, many investors have steered clear. This can open up more room for people who are willing to deal with it. There are ways around it through self-exemptions and such.
❌ Cons:
Rent Control Law: In 2021, voters passed a strict rent control ordinance (3% cap). It’s been amended but still deters some investors.
Lower Appreciation Potential (in some areas): Slower growth in certain neighborhoods compared to hot zones in Minneapolis.
Less “Buzz”: Doesn’t have quite the same draw for trendy businesses or nightlife, which can mean slower rental demand in certain pockets.
Generally Higher Taxes: St. Paul tends to have higher property taxes, but it is very case by case for certain areas.
I hope this helps anyone considering buying investments in the Twin Cities. For those out there who already have properties in Minneapolis or St. Paul, what has your experience been like?