Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Marty Boardman

Marty Boardman has started 5 posts and replied 291 times.

Post: Is this the future of flipping houses?

Marty Boardman
Pro Member
Posted
  • Real Estate Investor and Instructor
  • Gilbert, AZ
  • Posts 303
  • Votes 330

No Justin, I do not believe this is the future of house flipping. 

I was approached a few years ago by an investment group in Phoenix looking to implement this strategy (JV agreement). They wanted me to provide the design concepts/SOW/budget for the properties and utilize my rehab team. They would lend the homeowner the funds for the rehab and compensate me for my time. It didn't work out because there were way too many people involved in the decision-making. The owners were especially difficult to work with. Basically everyone watches HGTV and so everyone thinks they're an expert with design. And since it's still their house they want the final say. Never a good idea to "partner" with someone you don't know.

Also, HUGE risk putting up the rehab funds without owning the property. If the owner files bankruptcy, goes into foreclosure or dies you'll have a difficult time getting your money back.

I agree with @Justin Fox - it's best to have full control over the outcome of the deal. Even with the proper expectations set people are people. Buyers are liars, sellers are worse :)

Post: How I Got my Significant Other on Board

Marty Boardman
Pro Member
Posted
  • Real Estate Investor and Instructor
  • Gilbert, AZ
  • Posts 303
  • Votes 330
Quote from @Michael Mackney:

By on board, I meant more so a partner to help me along the process. Someone that can join me on this journey and learn with me. She trusted what I was doing even when she had no interest, but having her excited to learn as well now makes it so much better! 


 That's great Michael! Congrats!

Post: How I Got my Significant Other on Board

Marty Boardman
Pro Member
Posted
  • Real Estate Investor and Instructor
  • Gilbert, AZ
  • Posts 303
  • Votes 330

So cool this worked for you Michael! I'm curious what you mean by "on board"? Were you seeking her approval to invest money in real estate? Or were you looking for her to be your business partner/co-decision maker?

I've been married for 24 years (dating/engaged for 6 before that) so I've been with my wife for 30 years. I quit my 9-5 job after we'd been married for 5 years to go into real estate investing full-time. I tried everything to get her involved. We attended networking events, mastermind groups, I shared books with her...all of it. But she never had any interest in real estate. I wanted her to be my partner in the business but it just wasn't her thing.

This frustrated me at first, but I had a friend that told me to be grateful that my wife trusted me enough to quit my job, and make important business decisions without her involvement. Sure, it would be cool to be the cute (well she's cute, I'm not) rehab couple that goes around fixing up houses like you see on HGTV. This sounds like an ideal situation and it works for most couples.

The point is if you can get your significant other/spouse to be your partner then great! It's fun to collaborate and work with the ones you love. But don't get too upset if they don't want to run the business with you. All that matters is you have their support/trust.

Post: Funding a Couple of Pre-Foreclosures

Marty Boardman
Pro Member
Posted
  • Real Estate Investor and Instructor
  • Gilbert, AZ
  • Posts 303
  • Votes 330
Quote from @Alex Webb:
Quote from @Marty Boardman:

A HML will still want a significant down payment (at least 15-20%). A partner is a good option if you can find someone that knows the area and is willing to take the risk with you.

You didn't mention any rehab costs in your numbers, are both properties turnkey?

#1 needs a bit of a clean up, but overall in good shape and #2 is completely turn key. 

Got it! You could also wait until it's closer to the sellers' auction dates and negotiate subject-to deals with them. Then you don't need HML or a partner. You could offer each of them 3-5K to sign title over to you. You may have to kick in enough cash to cover their Realtors' commissions as well.

Post: What are Cash Buyers looking for in the Indy Market?

Marty Boardman
Pro Member
Posted
  • Real Estate Investor and Instructor
  • Gilbert, AZ
  • Posts 303
  • Votes 330

I can't comment on Indianapolis, I don't flip houses there. But when I get this question from wholesalers in my market the answer is always...

ALL that matters is MARGIN. If there is enough margin between the ARV and purchase price then I do the deal. I don't care where it's located or how much work is required.

As a wholesaler it's imperative that you understand what it costs to rehab a house, as well as the holding costs, so you can provide your cash buyers with money-making deals. If you can find deals with enough meat on the bone for you and the cash buyer it's a win-win and you'll have yourself a sustainable business.

Good luck Nolan!

Post: Funding a Couple of Pre-Foreclosures

Marty Boardman
Pro Member
Posted
  • Real Estate Investor and Instructor
  • Gilbert, AZ
  • Posts 303
  • Votes 330

A HML will still want a significant down payment (at least 15-20%). A partner is a good option if you can find someone that knows the area and is willing to take the risk with you.

You didn't mention any rehab costs in your numbers, are both properties turnkey?

Post: Joining a mentorship/ mastermind - is it worth it?

Marty Boardman
Pro Member
Posted
  • Real Estate Investor and Instructor
  • Gilbert, AZ
  • Posts 303
  • Votes 330
Quote from @Bruce Woodruff:

I would not pay for any coaching. It's unnecessary and a waste of money and time.... There are plenty of alternatives, starting right here...

Bruce, I see your comments in the forums often and it's clear that you're a successful and knowledgable general contractor. 

I'm curious why you believe coaching is a waste of money? Have you ever invested in coaching before? Did you get burned by someone?

Like @Shiloh Lundahl, every high-level business owner I know values coaching and education, and they all allocate a minimum of 25-30K per year to it.

Post: regarding subject to financing.

Marty Boardman
Pro Member
Posted
  • Real Estate Investor and Instructor
  • Gilbert, AZ
  • Posts 303
  • Votes 330
Quote from @Patrick K.:
Quote from @Marty Boardman:
Quote from @Patrick K.:

Hi all, I have been watching a lot of Pace Morby's videos these days. He is an advocate of subject-to financing to purchase properties. 

In all the videos I have watched, he talked about all the up-side of subject-to financing. but the downside is rarely discussed. I thought I could use BP's collective brain power to help educate myself further on this subject. For all questions below, it is assumed I am the buyer, who wants to assume the seller's loan and take the title of their properties. 

The pinkest elephant in the room is what happens when I as an investor default on the loan payment. I understand the ownership goes back to the original seller. However, if this is during an economic downturn when default would likely happen, there might be no equity in the house for the original seller, and I can't see how a seller would be comfortable being ultimately responsible for a mortgage that might last 20-30 years. It felt like a glorified rent-to-own agreement. 


Any thought would be appreciated. 

As others have pointed out Patrick the original seller does not get the house back if the buyer defaults. The investor has equitable title to the property. If the bank foreclosures the investor receives any surplus funds and the original seller gets nothing (well, they do get a foreclosure on their credit report).

There are really only two types of sellers that are agreeable to subject-to deals:

1. Sellers with no equity

2. Sellers in foreclosure

I've done hundreds of subject-to deals with both. 

When the housing market crashed in 2008 I defaulted on numerous subject-to deals. Values dropped by 55% in my area (Phoenix) and there was no way I could sell these properties. Fortunately, I escaped any legal trouble because I worked out arrangements with the original sellers and gave them their houses back. Others didn't want them back and were okay with a foreclosure. After all, they were headed that direction before I stepped in to buy their house in the first place.

In 2023 and beyond, I think acquiring houses subject-to is a smart strategy, especially if you plan to fix and flip because you don't need to keep the mortgage in the original seller's name for very long.

As for acquiring rentals, subject-to is also preferable as long as you can count on at least $300 + in cash flow (and have reserves for 6 months). But I would advise you have a plan in place to pay off the existing mortgage in 2-3 years because eventually the original seller will become unhappy with having a loan in their name and no house to show for it.

Finally, there's a lot of irrational fear out there about the due on sale clause and the lender calling the note. I've never seen this happen. Banks are in the business of collecting loan payments, not calling mortgages. If you're paying on time they don't care if Santa Claus owns the house.

Good luck Patrick!


 Hi Marty, 

Thank you for the information. What was the worst that could happen to the investor if default happens? from what I understand. the bank forclose on the proeprty whose mortgage is with the previous seller. and their credit report got dented. but you are fine other than losing the house?

Also as for your comment regarding pay off the existing mortgage in 2-3 years. I think with some improvement on the house. I can refinance out the old mortgage and still with no cash down. However I might not be incentivized to do so depends on the rate. What can the seller do if they don't "like" the situation? 

thank you for your time.

I'm sure there are other worst case scenarios that could play out if the investor defaults. The previous owner could sue, for example. But if they don't then the only real loss is the property (and any money invested). 

@Tom Gimer I've never heard of a lender placing a judgment like this on the new owner. Not sure how this would work since the new owner didn't sign the mortgage/note or make a personal guarantee. In many states the lender can't even get a default judgment against the borrower if it was a purchase-money mortgage. In Arizona, for example, this can't be done. As long as the money borrowed is used to purchase the property, the lender is forbidden from obtaining a default judgment for any losses.

As for dealing with the previous seller Patrick, if you disclose your intent to keep the loan in their name for an unlimited period of time, there's really nothing they can do. You may not even need to disclose this at all. But if they become unhappy with the situation they could notify their lender that they no longer own the house. That would make it very difficult for you to make loan payments and/or pay the loan off.

Post: Pre-Foreclosure/ Foreclosure Experiance

Marty Boardman
Pro Member
Posted
  • Real Estate Investor and Instructor
  • Gilbert, AZ
  • Posts 303
  • Votes 330

Hey Hunter! I've been buying pre-foreclosures and at the auction (Trustee's Sales and Sheriff's Sales) since 2002 in Arizona, Illinois and Wisconsin.

Each state has a unique set of rules for how the process works (judicial and non-judicial states). Utah is a non-judicial state, which means that the procedure is governed by state statute.

As a beginner, I think it's best to focus on pre-foreclosures. As a Realtor you will need to be careful and disclose that you're a licensed real estate professional when negotiating with sellers in foreclosure. You may also want to notify your broker.

I've found it's best to approach homeowners in foreclosure when their auction date is 30 days (or less away) because they have limited options at this point. Here's a link to Lundberg and Associates, they're one of the top foreclosure law firms in Utah: https://www.lundbergfirm.com/f...

Are you looking to do foreclosure deals for yourself, or for your clients?

Post: Joining a mentorship/ mastermind - is it worth it?

Marty Boardman
Pro Member
Posted
  • Real Estate Investor and Instructor
  • Gilbert, AZ
  • Posts 303
  • Votes 330

My two main criteria for investing in mentoring/coaching:

1. Is the mentor/coach getting results in their own business?

2. Is the mentor/coach getting results for others?

It should be easy to produce these results (i.e. video testimonials, screen shots). I don't really care about the price of the coaching/program, I only care that it works. 

Think about it like this...if you invest 2K in this coaching but it sucks and you don't see any ROI after 12 months is that better than investing 30K in coaching and getting a 5x return on your investment in a year?