Quote from @Austin Paige:
Quote from @Laura Shinkle:
In trying to decide between two cities, I 100% agree with @Conner Olsen. Remember that a househack is an investment strategy but it's also where you live. If you're miserable in your housing situation, it may make you act a little more impulsively down the road (and impulsive is never a good thing in real estate).
In order to assume a loan, you'll need lots of cash on hand. If the seller only owes $200k and he or she is selling for $500k, then you'll need to bring $300k+ to the table in order to purchase the home. And not hard money cash, all YOUR cash.
I can't speak to the Austin/Houston area, but I don't recommend my clients focus solely on assumable loans. Finding a househack that you like is tough enough in a market where inventory is limited. That will limit your search even further. Not to say that you shouldn't go for it if you find it, but I wouldn't narrow my options that much. Just my two cents.
I’m new here sorry if this was already explained, but what would he need 300k cash? When house hacking is it not possible to get a loan for 500k and just buy the property why does it matter how much equity the seller has in the property?
Great question Austin! So he was specifically asking about assumable loans. "I'd prefer to assume another Veterans Loan, to avoid 7% interest rates". This is a type of creative financing that has been talked about a lot lately since the memory of 3% mortgages is still in our recent memories.
A FHA or VA loan is technically assumable, meaning the buyers are able to take on the seller's current mortgage (if the loan documents state that is possible, you qualify, etc). That sounds great in theory, right? If the seller got a loan 3 years ago and it's at 2.875%, that's a heck of a lot better than the 6.875% that you might get quoted today. However, if you're assuming the loan, you're also assuming the loan amount. You can't increase it to match the purchase price/amount of the current contract.
So let's say the seller bought it 3 years ago and their loan balance is $200k. If it's selling for $500k, and the mortgage that you'd be taking on is at $200k, then that leaves a balance of $300k that you still need to bring to the table. In theory, you could get a second mortgage for that balance (or a portion of it). That said, I don't know of any lender that would do that. Any lender or bank wants to be first in line if something goes wrong and you stop paying. Being a second mortgage, they wouldn't be first in line.
That said, a buyer can still buy that property at $500k and get a normal loan right now with a smaller downpayment. With househacking, that can be as little as 3% if you're a first time homebuyer, conventional loan, or 0% down with VA/USDA loans. The only reason the above example was so cash heavy is because he was specifically targeting the assumable loan piece.
Does that make sense?