Just because they flipped houses doesn't mean they will do new construction well. Because this is a new strategy for them, it likely means they have fewer options for construction loans due to lack of experience. If you aren't familiar with the way construction loans work (on a draw and interest only paid on what you lend out) and aren't familiar with construction scope and timelines, I would not lend on this project. You could potentially shore up the loan by adding additional collateral (even if it's in 2nd position behind bank loans) but it's still pretty risky when you aren't knowledgeable about this type of project. Most truly individual private money lenders don't love construction for a number of reasons:
- Time horizon on these projects is too long and the project itself highly speculative
- Most construction loans are non-dutch, meaning you pay only on what funds are released and PMLs don't like having to earmark additional funds that aren't deployed and aren't earning a monthly interest on.
- Handling the construction draw process (without using a third party service to facilitate) can be super cumbersome and difficult to understand to most lay PML investors. Just remember that mechanic liens can precede your loan potentially and lien release waivers and onsite inspections of work completed are super important to the release of funds.
- Any budget overruns could exceed the amount of capital a small PML may have and require the project to be refinanced into a new construction loan elsewhere while the project is inflight and this could pose challenges if the borrower doesn't have much skin in the game or liquidity.
Good luck with this but make sure you dig a little deeper into the project before deciding to move forward.