Originally posted by
@Thomas S.:
@Sam Leon
This is the primary reason why ESA should not even be a issue. I can not understand why landlords continue questioning this issue. I have consistently avoided renting to anyone applying to rent having a ESA animal. I consider 100% of them to be a scam. As soon as I see they have a ESA it is automatic rejection since I do not allow animals. If a applicant is trying to avoid paying a pet fee...…...pass.
While I agree with your sentiments regarding the ease of scamming the system, I disagree that landlords should not consider this an issue. I know for a fact that in our area there are individuals who call about vacancies for the sole purpose of tripping a landlord up and then slamming them with a fair housing lawsuit. I’m confident I have been contacted by some of these individuals in the past based on the way they word their questions. If a landlord does not know the law, he/she can easily be tripped up and respond with the “wrong” answer.
Also, under the current laws a tenant can apply, be approved, and move in, and THEN submit an ESA accommodation request. I’m genuinely curious as to what you would do in that scenario? At that point it’s not as simple as moving on to a more qualified applicant.