I make the best decisions for my situation when I have information, but I am struggling with something I don't have enough information about. I hope this makes sense.
Right now I own three real estate properties, each bought intentionally for my use for reasons, in three different states, two single family and one three family. For example, my other work was taking me to Worcester, MA regularly from upstate NY, and I kept finding it difficult to find a place to stay with two dogs. Three years of trying! After I decided to buy a property (my third), I decided a multifamily was best, and to rent out two floors to pay for it.
I purchased real estate other times for excellent reasons, and now I am trying to decide what to do about the first two places and what role geographic diversity has in my decisions when I personally do not need the properties anymore. Rent or sell?
I will be asked about the numbers, but the numbers are attractive enough on the face of it to rent one, and a close call on the other, if they were both down the road from me here in Worcester. I just keep picturing the loop, from Worcester, to eastern upstate NY to southwest VT, then the loop back to eastern upstate NY and back to Worcester (there is no better direct road from SW VT to Worcester) to check on property -- and I cannot decide if it's a good life. I can do it, and most of the year it's beautiful. (FYI, I have to see property and cannot manage it on the phone.)
But I picture what else I would be doing if I wasn't doing that. Would it be better to sell both properties and buy another property in Worcester solely for investment? Or is it a bad idea to own two old 3 families in Worcester with ancient sewer systems?
Does anyone have any stories, insight or data to share about whether there is a benefit to be diversified in location? I need to understand it better.
Thanks for reading this wordy post.