Originally posted by @Todd Goedeke:
@Kathryn Morea, consider NNN leasing new construction STVRs in an area where vacationing is big part of economy and thus STVRs won t be restricted. With NNN lease of 10% she should net 75k per year. She can purchase 4-5 New duplexes in one area at $400k each to satisfy 1031 parameters.Since she will be turning over management of properties via NNN lease distance is not an issue. By owning properties directly instead of a syndication she/you maintain control of lease terms and leasee.
Vacation areas like Henderson,Nevada, Austin, Phoenix Area, Nashville and Panama City Beach are good areas to explore. A qualified builder and manager/leasee can be found.
Hi Todd, Thanks so much for your reply. I appreciate you taking the time to post. I'm not sure I fully understand your suggestion. So are you saying she would purchase new construction in a vacation area (4 duplexes for example at 400K/each = 16K) and then NNN lease those back to a local operator? I'm not sure how you get to 10% or 13%. Can you explain that part? I've not seen NNN leases used with residential leases. Are there short term operators who will agree to pay NNN (including property taxes and all maintenance)? If so, this may be a good move, and give her exactly what she's seeking. And to answer your other question about if she is willing to take on more debt, the answer is maybe. She's probably willing, but the other side to that is a bank must be willing to lend. For duplex lenders, this is considered 1-4 unit residential and she would likely need to qualify similar to if buying a 2nd home. DTI will likely be a problem in qualifying for new loan(s). Whereas with a commercial purchase, like an apartment building, the property will help qualify and her personal income/DTI is not as big a factor. Some of the areas you mentioned, while resort destinations, also have their struggles with cities cracking down. (Locally Anaheim & Palm Springs are also heavily regulated, even though these are historically tourist areas). Curious if others are considering going all-in on STVR with recourse loans and then having cities ban / severely restrict Airbnb as they have in Los Angeles / Santa Monica where I currently have multiple STVRs myself. The swiftness of cities/Airbnb to enforce new laws and cancel all existing bookings leaving the property owner holding the bag is pretty shocking. This seems risky. Would anyone else care to chime in? Thanks again for the response!