Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Karen Orr

Karen Orr has started 2 posts and replied 19 times.

Originally posted by @Marc Winter:

@David Jackson   there is a term in real estate law: "Statute of Frauds".  Simply explained, real estate agreements, in order to be enforceable, must be in writing.  A 'verbal acceptance' is not worth the paper it isn't written on.  I don't really think about it as being 'cut-throat' as previously opined;  rather, it is the only proper way to put a transaction together.

I'd see this as a learning experience which didn't cost you a loss of money.  Just keep on moving forward!

 CORRECT.  If one doesn't under the Statute of Frauds, you probably shouldn't be in this business.  

Originally posted by @Alex Bekeza:

We used to see these guys in the same restaurants we'd hit on our lunch breaks on Ventura Blvd.  Remain diligent on where your money is going!

https://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-shapiro-woodbridge-ponzi-arrested-20190411-story.html

Prosecutors said the Ponzi scheme was orchestrated from Woodbridge’s offices throughout the United States, including in Sherman Oaks, where it is headquartered, and in Boca Raton, Fla., where it was previously headquartered.

High-pressure sales tactics were used to secure money for what were promised to be “low risk” and “conservative” investments, but in reality the funds were funneled to real estate owned by Shapiro, according to the U.S. attorney’s office.

Woodbridge eventually became financially insolvent, the scheme began to unravel, and Shapiro in 2017 considering filing for bankruptcy, prosecutors said.

Still, he, Roseman and Acevedo continued to sell the fraudulent investments without telling investors Woodbridge was on the verge of collapse, according to the indictment. From October to December of 2017, they brought in more than $52 million in investor money before filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in December 2017.

Prosecutors said filing for bankruptcy caused investors to suffer substantial losses on their $1 billion in principal. At least 2,600 victims invested their retirement savings, totaling about $400 million.

Shapiro siphoned off $35 million for his own benefit, according to prosecutors, spending $3.1 million for chartering private planes and travel, $6.7 million on a home, $2.6 million on home improvements, $1.8 million on personal income taxes, $1.4 million for his ex-wife, and more than $672,000 on luxury automobiles.

Roseman received $2.5 million for himself and Acevedo received $1.1 million, prosecutors said.

The Securities and Exchange Commission’s previous enforcement action in 2017 was settled in January for a total of $1 billion in penalties and disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, the agency said. The defendants — Woodbridge, 281 related companies and Shapiro — did not admit or deny the allegations.

Woodbridge, according to the SEC, told investors it would use their money to make so-called hard money loans — a type of expensive, short-term loan that’s secured by property and is often used by house flippers and other property developers. Instead, the SEC alleges, nearly all of the funds went directly into Shapiro’s and Woodbridge’s own projects.

But I bet they had great credit. 

Originally posted by @Susan Maneck:
Originally posted by @Cameron Riley:

@Susan Maneck

True! Lol! I never run credit! I work in the urban areas and low income areas of the investment business. 

Well, I do want to know if they have ever been evicted or they don't pay child support. People who don't take care of their kids are not likely to take care of my house. 

 Finally a statement that is probably true.  Unless their DNA shows they aren't the parent.  

Originally posted by @Alissa Engel:

@Cameron Riley

Always run a credit check!

Most of the reasons why have already been covered by others. Here’s an additional reason that I learned the hard way: people that say they have no recent rental references because they’ve owned for a long time. This is not always true....they might know that they have bad references. A credit report will show their mortgages.

 OR it might show their property is paid off, and they haven't rented in a long time because they were living in a relatives property.  You folks are looking at this as black and white.  Things are never black and white.   They might not have references if occupying a friends house or a relatives. One comes to mind and she was on Oprah years ago.  A very high profile HR recruiter house sat in some of the most expensive homes in Georgia.  This is about 25 yrs I spoke with this person.  They were very credible, yet had no mortgage or rental history.  Things are not always what they seem. 

Originally posted by @Thomas S.:

I rent B class properties. For me a minimum credit score of 650 is everything, absolutely mandatory. If they are below 650 I don't care why, they are too much risk. They are likely living pay check to pay check or living beyond their means to have not been able to bring it back up. When my applicants are above 650 I then dig deeper into the report to determine if there are other factors that will make them too high risk. If they have maxed out their credit limits they are a no go. 

My policy is not only do they have to be able to pay I must also be able to collect when they don't. I want tenants that respect the value of having a high credit score. Most of my tenants are in the high 7s. 

Landlords renting C class properties use much different metrics. Every applicant is high risk regardless of credit score. It would still be wise to set a minimum score requirement, much lower than 650, but the reality is that C class tenants don't place much importance on protecting their credit. They often use credit without concerns of having to repay.

 AND without fear of being correct, stating an absolute that all applicants with a score below 650 don't place much importance on their credit is literally a ball faced story and has no basis in fact.  There are too many factors nowadays that can deflate credit in one day.  Things such as Identity theft.  Their spouse wiped out the accounts, ran up the cards without their knowledge.  A child, whether adult or adolescent did something stupid with their cards or identity.  I know of at least one family member that happened to.  The child stole the checks, the cards everything, and the parent wasn't aware for months.  Stuff happens.  On the flip side looking at all of these postings, from a consumer side, I find that investors are asking a fortune for properties that are in bullet ridden neighborhoods and have done nothing but "paint" the place after purchase.  As a consumer I have a choice, too.  And I screen and run background checks on YOU.  This is not a unilateral contract.  They are bilateral.  the 14th amendment comes to mind.  Having dollar signs in your eyes and heart with no compassion or ability to read between the lines is not the kind of landlord I would want, nor would I sell to.  Sellers can be choosy, too.    MY 2 cents.  There is an old saying, there but for the grace of God so I.  I worked with people who were "investors" like the ones on here.  I saw their climb up. I saw them fall down and become tenants.  Just sayin. 

DB OBrien

replied about 1 hour ago

You: Sadly, the report run by PM was not thorough. After the eviction process stated I ran a background check and the bankruptcy came up, it must have been too new to show up on the credit report (I’m assuming, as it occurred just a month before the lease was signed). My point of my post is, if the credit report was falsified, isn’t that fraud? Can I have her charged with committing this fraud? I’m trying to legally make her life uncomfortable...

Not necessarily.  I can think of at least two scenarios that explain it away.  One, their name was commingled with one similar or the same, and that is the credit report your PM found.  They may be a victim of identity theft.  It doesn't always show up right away.  

Secondly, once had a friend that was stabbed in the back by a business partner and had an 850 credit score when they filed bankruptcy.  It isn't necessarily fraud.  Check with an attorney but, it would only be ID theft or fraud if they presented a credit report that wasn't theirs. 

Thirdly, nobody asked, but I will state here. It is okay for someone to print out their own credit report and give to a landlord.  Because if you pull it, it is a hard hit and depending on their goals in life (college, need student loans, new baby on the way, anticipating needing a new car), then a hard hit impacts them for a long time.  Thus harming the prospective tenant. And frankly, unless someone is a bank or a court order, nobody should give out their EIN unless you can guarantee me AND accept liability for lack of competent record retention, putting me at risk of ID theft.  One in 4 ppl now have been a victim. I don't give mine out except to regulated institutions - period.  No matter who you say you are.  A copy is sufficient - or show the letterhead version to the landlord.  

A friend had an aunt die last week.  They are potentially desiring to put the property up for sale on BP.  The other spouse was in the hospital when she died.  And if they live, will head to rehab after hospital. So their question is this, before signing up for BP.  Due to obvious problems with security, people breaking in, knowing the owner is incapacitated, children not living around the corner, is the address required for them to advertise in the Marketplace?  Otherwise, they are looking for another way to advertise once the property goes through probate.  As the surviving spouse, if they make it, may go live with one of their children.  
1) So is address required for advertising in Marketplace?  2) If so, they can't advertise here. 3) So, where can they advertise?  Does Hotpads and others require the address? I believe Zillow requires the address (correct me if I am wrong).  All help appreciated to help this elderly widower. 

In reply to Erik Whiting, this post.

Erik Whiting Real Estate Investor from Springfield, Missouri

replied 4 days ago

Thomas S. has a point about obligations due under a lease, and I will expand on it just a tad.

Yes, you do need to do everything by the book as others have encouraged. My policy is we will accept an Early Lease Termination (ELT) request for a fee equal to 6 weeks of rent. The tenant must also give 30 days notice and pay rent for that month, remove all personal property, and leave the unit "broom clean". They do not forfeit their Security Deposit automatically, and it will be refunded less damages and cleaning beyond normal wear and tear.

~~~

Yes, indeed.  You must follow the law or the landlord could find themselves liable.  Some of the advice given here, to me, was flat out dangerous.  Just because someone goes to jail does not waive their rights, civil rights, bundle of rights etc.  Plus, what if the person is eventually exonerated under an innocent relief process?  Every situation is different.  If the landlord follows the law, then you don't have to prop up the truth.  It will stand on its own. 

Back in the day, it was the home of the General Motors Lakewood automobile plant.  Then when it closed, the ripple effect of every dollar being spent, 5 times, eventually affected the whole area. 

Jimmy Martz - go look at Alexander's profile.  It explains it.  He works for a lender.  Good way to learn.  Best way to learn, from the inside.