Originally posted by @Joe Villeneuve:
Originally posted by @Kai Van Leuven:
@Joe Villeneuve
My overall thought is that the purchase price is the only thing that matters. Your “cashflow vs down payment model” to me, is a terrible strategy. My example;
Little Yellow House
Purchase: 127k
Fix up: 25k
Down Payment: Cash
Rent 1475-1800
I let this house be paid off in cash for a couple of years until I needed the money for another investment. I could have BRRR'd it after the seasoning period and taken the money (Value around 350k) but I didn't have a need at the time for the money.
My point is that if I would have just been into it for the least amount, or refinanced it when I didn’t need the money, or any other dogma that is pushed. It would have not made as much sense.
Getting a good deal is what matters.
I can't follow this because there are so many parts missing. I'll mention just a few:
1 - If you think my comments are "cash flow vs. Down Payment", then you don't understand what I'm saying...at all.
2 - When I give examples my numbers are specific to an actual property...not some arbitrary "Little Yellow House"
3 - Again, specific numbers...not "Rent 1475 - 1800"...and the rent isn't what the analysis is based on. It's based on the CF...which you make no mention of at all.
4 - In your previous criticism, you say I left out a number of things, and yet you mention rent...but no monthly expenses. Why?
5 - How many years is "...a couple of years..." payoff?
There's a huge difference between total cost and actual cost...which I don't think you are grasping.
You're right when you say, "Getting a good deal is what matters". What are you basing your "good deal" on though? I know what I'm basing mine on...profit.
I guess I will go at it line by line
1 - If you think my comments are "cash flow vs. Down Payment", then you don't understand what I'm saying...at all.
Your whole argument that a large downpayment hurts you is silly at best. Everyone knows that assets are always repositioned. The idea that a downpayment effects a "deal" is very shortsighted.
2 - When I give examples my numbers are specific to an actual property...not some arbitrary "Little Yellow House"
It is a little yellow house, I own it. I have for 6 or 7 years. I don't really feel like looking up the date and I don't post addresses of deals I have done.
3 - Again, specific numbers...not "Rent 1475 - 1800"...and the rent isn't what the analysis is based on. It's based on the CF...which you make no mention of at all.
I started at 1475, it rents now for 1800. I make a small amount on the property each month. I don't consider monthly income to be a huge reason why I buy property. You really miss all the other large "cashflows" if you are focused on monthly. The Monthly keeps your head above water.
4 - In your previous criticism, you say I left out a number of things, and yet you mention rent...but no monthly expenses. Why?
I just don't like to put it all out there. I am a private guy.
5 - How many years is "...a couple of years..." payoff?
It has debt on it now. My point was, when I first bought the property in cash, I waited to do a refinance. I collected the rent, 1475 at the time, and waited until the right time to pull out money. You might consider that "dead equity" but I also was not paying interest on it and having the money sit in my bank account.
There's a huge difference between total cost and actual cost...which I don't think you are grasping.
If on a refinance I get out about 100k more than I put in, who really cares?
My point is this, down payment does not matter. If you are dealing with a liquid'ish asset (conforming SFR), you buy a great deal, and you plan on growing, you will reposition (sell, refi, ect.) that asset before you pay yourself back off monthly CF. If you limit your down payment, or pay in cash, it really does not matter.