Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Jung-Jin Shim

Jung-Jin Shim has started 2 posts and replied 3 times.

I've been searching for rental properties in Columbus for months, but I've noticed that it's extremely difficult to find a property that's profitable with high interest rates and already significantly increased property prices. Some say there are still opportunities in Columbus since it's growing, but I'm unsure if investing with the hope of future appreciation is a good idea when current cash flow is very weak. Some suggest investing out of state for better cash flow, but that's not an option for me at this time.

Recently, I ran into a realtor who suggested mid-term rentals to construction workers as a more profitable investment model. She mentioned that she's doing it herself and finding it very profitable. Before taking any action, I'd like to research whether this model is truly profitable and feasible. Has anyone done this or heard about this type of rental? How do I attract construction workers as tenants? How does this differ from long-term rentals or mid-term rentals for travel nurses?

Thank you!

Quote from @Kevin Sobilo:

@Jung-Jin Shim, a few things to keep in mind.

1. A deal is what YOU make of it NOT what is advertised. If the asking price is $185k, it might not be a "deal" worth it for you unless you can get it for $165k. You buy because its a "deal" not because you like it yourself personally.

2. You make money 3 ways: cash-flow, mortgage pay down and market appreciation. All of them figure into what you expect to get out of the deal even though cash-flow in my opinion is the most preferred of the 3 ways.

3. Deals can get better over time. Over the next 3-5 years, it is not unreasonable to expect rents to go up a little and for interest rates to go down. So, that is you refinance your cash-flow will improve quite a bit.

4. Stocks suck! If you invest $100k in stocks and they go up 10% you make $10k. If you invest $100k in real estate you can acquire a $400k property and if that appreciates 10% you make $40k! Plus real estate is tax advantaged!

Real estate is better because leverage allows you to multiple your return. Your return is tax advantaged and also you have more direct control over the investment. 

Thank you so much for your answers. I was wondering if you have any bottom line in terms of an initial cash on cash return.

Hello, I am new to a real estate investment. I’ve run some numbers with a current real estate listing, but it seems hard to find a house with positive cash flow. Even if I found one, the cash on cash return is very small. I understand Columbus is a highly appreciated area, but do you think it is still worth investing with the small cash on cash return (sometimes 0)  if appreciation is expected? Is it worth going through when the average yearly rate of s&p is about 10%, which is pure passive income? Thank you,