Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Joshua Thompson

Joshua Thompson has started 3 posts and replied 169 times.

Post: Property tax on Recent Purchased property

Joshua Thompson
Tax & Financial Services
Posted
  • Accountant
  • Princeton, TX
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 94
Originally posted by @Greg Scott:

My 2 cents:  Hire a professional to challenge the taxes for you.  

For my DFW properties I use Resolute.  I contracted with them.  Now, every year they evaluate my property taxes and challenge them as needed.  Their bill is a portion of the money saved.   Sometimes they get my taxes lowered in years I wouldn't have considered challenging.  I sleep well knowing an expert is looking out for me.

It saves me a lot of time and brain damage.  Plus, they know how to talk with the review board so are morel likely to get a favorable outcome than I would.

They would make a good addition to my team. I was looking at Resolute but it looks like they only serve specific counties in Texas. Do you mind sending me their link if that isn't true?

Post: 1031 Exchange Discussion

Joshua Thompson
Tax & Financial Services
Posted
  • Accountant
  • Princeton, TX
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 94
Originally posted by @Nick Cannon:

Hi Bigger Pockets Family. I’m wondering if anyone has an appetite to discuss 1031 exchanges from the angle of unique strategies. I have a pretty unique niche where I help accredited investors who are looking to retire and/or exit the physical management of properties but don’t want to pay cap gains do a 1031 Exchange into a Securities product. They still get monthly income without having to physically manage the property.

There’s obviously restrictions and it’s not for everyone. Just curious as to the potential interest in this forum.

This isn’t a covert solicitation I assure you. Just looking to connect with folks that may have an interest.

If anyone wants to have a discussion please respond to this post. Thanks in advance!

 Hey Nick, I'm pretty sure 1031 exchanges are for like-kind property. Interested on how you're getting around this?

Post: Advice on transferring ownership of my father’s house to me

Joshua Thompson
Tax & Financial Services
Posted
  • Accountant
  • Princeton, TX
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 94

Double check with an attorney but you may want to have him write a will or trust so the property doesn't goto probate. If it does goto probate I know some places you'll be taxed on getting it out. I'm not an attorney but it maybe something you can talk to an attorney about or do more research on.

Post: Quickobooks Version (Tax Strategies: Savvy Real Estate Investors)

Joshua Thompson
Tax & Financial Services
Posted
  • Accountant
  • Princeton, TX
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 94

There are two versions of QB you'll hear about often around here. The first being Quickbooks online (QBO) and the second being Quickbooks desktop. Both have their pros and cons but many people enjoy QBO for its flexibility and ability to link to your bank account. 

As far as "classes" when allocating certain expenses to a property it is recommended that each property is set up as a class in QuickBooks. This allows you to look at P&L reports strictly based on classes (each property).

QB desktop I believe can last about 3 years being supported and cost a flat fee of $300 (probably gone up). 

QBO you pay monthly and can add on services like linking your bank account. The monthly dues quickly add up.

Post: Tax penalty on sale of property

Joshua Thompson
Tax & Financial Services
Posted
  • Accountant
  • Princeton, TX
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 94

@Paul Papamarkos

You need some more detail to your questions. I'm sure plenty of people are hit with a penalty is they sell in under 5 years and (insert incorrect method of reporting here).

Maybe some more details and the reason why you're asking will generate a few good responses.

Post: Rental Property losses carry over

Joshua Thompson
Tax & Financial Services
Posted
  • Accountant
  • Princeton, TX
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 94
Originally posted by @Daniel B.:

@Joshua Thompson Hi, yes, the phaseout begins at $100,000 as we experienced in 2017 (and thus have additional losses to carry forward).  I am self employed and don't have any W-2 income, although my wife does.

@Basit Siddiqi & @Daniel Dietz I am aware of the basics of passive losses can carry forward to cancel out passive income.  However, I don't have passive income in 2018, but $5,000 in losses from rental property after taking into account $30,000 in depreciation.  Can I carry forward previous years losses to increase the losses this year since I am allowed to take $25,000 in losses, but will only have roughly $5,000?  I have already filed a tax extension.

We deducted a lot more last year (traditional IRA's instead of Roth, I opened a SEP IRA I will max out my 25%, etc). Essentially we are on the verge of our AGI being in the low $60,000 range and hoping to get the savers tax credit, which would be $2,000, so aside from us saving the additional taxes by showing more losses from our rental properties, we have a tax credit in play... Thank you for your responses!

 The passive losses can be carried forward. If you have $5000 loss last year that you couldn't use and this year has $10000 in losses you can use, perfect case you would have a total of $15000 in passive losses to offset that W-2 income.

Post: Rental Property losses carry over

Joshua Thompson
Tax & Financial Services
Posted
  • Accountant
  • Princeton, TX
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 94

@Daniel B. Hey man, not a CPA or EA but here are a few things I've picked up on and recommend you verifying with a CPA or EA.

The passive loss a rental produces each year can be used against your earned income (W-2 wages) if you earn below $150k married. There is a phase-out area your CPA/EA can speak more about if it applies to you. However, only up to $25k in passive losses can be used to offset earned income in one tax year.

Example: You earn a $75k W-2 income and have a $26k passive loss from a rental. You can use $25k of the $26k to offset your W-2 wage.

Taxes usually aren't cut and dry like that so you must realize there are other factors that can affect this and I'm really just scratching the surface.

However, I am not sure if you are able to carry forward ALLOWABLE passive losses. You can for sure carry forward passive losses that you were unable to use in previous years.

Post: How many exemptions should I put with paycheck?

Joshua Thompson
Tax & Financial Services
Posted
  • Accountant
  • Princeton, TX
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 94

The number you put in for your allowances on a W-4 is what I believe you're talking about. What number to put there all depends on your senerio, for example how much you make, how many dependents, are you married ect. With this information your CPA/EA should be able to give you the number you're looking for. If you earn a lot on your W-2 job you may want to claim 0 but it all depends on your situation and numbers.

Post: California LLC Fee when selling a property.

Joshua Thompson
Tax & Financial Services
Posted
  • Accountant
  • Princeton, TX
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 94
Originally posted by @Matt Ward:
Originally posted by @Joshua Thompson:
Originally posted by @Matt Ward:
Originally posted by @Joshua Thompson:

@Kaveh E.

Not a tax professional, but what you may be able to do to is form an LLC but elect to be taxed as an S corp. This should get rid of the California gross receipt tax that I believe you are referring to.

As far as the $500k ($250k if single) exclusion, if the property is your primary residence and you meet the requirement (a big one being have lived there for 2 of past 5 years) you can exclude up to $500k of the gain. However, once you start getting into the whole short term rental of the property I would recommend finding a good CPA/EA that specializes in real estate.

Also if the property is your primary residence and you aren't renting it at the moment I don't see a need to put it inside of an LLC. Honestly, it may be more of a headache then its worth.

Don't stop here, find a good professional there are plenty on BP. Good luck

 You definitely DO NOT want to have rentals in an S Corp.  That's #1.  

#2 is that as soon as you turn your primary residence into something else, like a rental, you are now entering the territories of losing your $500k Sec. 121 exclusion (MFJ).... of which there are variations based on timing and circumstances.

#3 is, if it's just for liability protection, why not get an umbrella policy? Same effect and it would be cheaper than the annual LLC tax ($800)

You're right on the not putting the property in an S-Corp. However, when you are an LLC and elect to be taxed like an S-Corp in CA to get around the gross receipt tax, that's different than having the properties in an S-Corp isn't it? Correct me if I'm wrong

The primary reason to not put rentals in S Corps is because if you ever need to move the property out of the S Corp and into your personal name, S Corp tax law treats that as a sale and you would be subject to the tax on the gain even though you are effectively just moving it from yourself (S Corp) to yourself (personal). LLC taxed as S Corp does not change this treatment.... I believe.

 Sweet! Thanks for the correction. I'll read up on it more.

Post: California LLC Fee when selling a property.

Joshua Thompson
Tax & Financial Services
Posted
  • Accountant
  • Princeton, TX
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 94
Originally posted by @Matt Ward:
Originally posted by @Joshua Thompson:

@Kaveh E.

Not a tax professional, but what you may be able to do to is form an LLC but elect to be taxed as an S corp. This should get rid of the California gross receipt tax that I believe you are referring to.

As far as the $500k ($250k if single) exclusion, if the property is your primary residence and you meet the requirement (a big one being have lived there for 2 of past 5 years) you can exclude up to $500k of the gain. However, once you start getting into the whole short term rental of the property I would recommend finding a good CPA/EA that specializes in real estate.

Also if the property is your primary residence and you aren't renting it at the moment I don't see a need to put it inside of an LLC. Honestly, it may be more of a headache then its worth.

Don't stop here, find a good professional there are plenty on BP. Good luck

 You definitely DO NOT want to have rentals in an S Corp.  That's #1.  

#2 is that as soon as you turn your primary residence into something else, like a rental, you are now entering the territories of losing your $500k Sec. 121 exclusion (MFJ).... of which there are variations based on timing and circumstances.

#3 is, if it's just for liability protection, why not get an umbrella policy? Same effect and it would be cheaper than the annual LLC tax ($800)

You're right on the not putting the property in an S-Corp. However, when you are an LLC and elect to be taxed like an S-Corp in CA to get around the gross receipt tax, that's different than having the properties in an S-Corp isn't it? Correct me if I'm wrong