Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: John K.

John K. has started 18 posts and replied 253 times.

Post: Seller finance deal

John K.Posted
  • Wholesaler/Investor
  • Dallas, TX
  • Posts 260
  • Votes 222

@Freddy Pettiford

Ok. This is what I would attempt to do, with this deal.

It's time for some reverse engineering. 

The problem with this deal, is the interest rate. That is an extremely high rate, for owner financing. My rates, are usually secured in the 4-6% range, mostly on the lower side. The seller deserves to be paid a premium, but not a 5 point premium. 

Since you know what the seller wants, 100k, this is how I would now approach her. 

Principal:  85,000

Term: 15 years

Dn Payment: 10%

Int. Rate:  4.5%

This makes your principal, $585 per month. I don't know your taxes or insurance, so you will need to add that in, to get your true payment.

This term, pays her just over 105K, in half the time. She of course gives up a ton of interest, doing it this way, but if you frame it correctly, she just may realize that 30 years, is a really long time to be holding a note. 

Obviously, you can play with these terms, however you want, to make it a bit more enticing for her. 

Post: Wholesale contracts for Texas

John K.Posted
  • Wholesaler/Investor
  • Dallas, TX
  • Posts 260
  • Votes 222

You're welcome.

I appreciate the offer, however I do not do JV wholesale deals.

Post: Wholesale contracts for Texas

John K.Posted
  • Wholesaler/Investor
  • Dallas, TX
  • Posts 260
  • Votes 222

@Jonathan Roughton

I would guess that many wholesalers just use the TREC 1-4 contract, that you can get online. 

https://www.trec.texas.gov/

My contract was reviewed and reworded, by my attorney to better suit my needs. I would advise that you sit down with an attorney, so you fully understand on how to wholesale, in Texas. It is legal, but only if you follow the rules. 

Post: Paid wholesale leads

John K.Posted
  • Wholesaler/Investor
  • Dallas, TX
  • Posts 260
  • Votes 222

@Austin Walker

I can't speak to their value, because I generate my own leads. However, I will point out something that you need to take into consideration. These "leads" are sold to what, 100s or even 1000s of people. How likely is it that you find a good lead, that hasn't already gone under contract?

Post: "Subject To" Real Estate Investing is Slimy. Prove me Wrong.

John K.Posted
  • Wholesaler/Investor
  • Dallas, TX
  • Posts 260
  • Votes 222
Originally posted by @Jay Hinrichs:

@John K.@Cody Zucker

OK let me give you guys a real life example of how this can spin out of control.

Guru came through Portland OR. pitching this  sub too Wrap or Sub too lease option.. this group ran out and paid market basically for houses. we were in a buyers market at the time.. they target LE deals so thousand down take over 2k down take over.. they got it done.. did about 40 of them.. then would sell on either lease option or wrap  same thing 2k down or so. and now they were making the delta of say 200 to 300 a month.. great in theory right..  Well right up to the point that their buyers started to default at first it was OK.. one default they could still make the mortgage and take the time to foreclose the new buyer out.. In our state lease options properly done need to be foreclosed. But even without that a eviction even if your RIGHT on top of it is 60 days and then you have to clean it up and release it or re sell it so say 4 months of negative cash flow.. Plus of course the 8k a month or so they were bringing in starting they were using those funds to pay overhead marketing their own rent etc.

So what happened by the time they came to me for help.. they had about 10 or 12 of these had gone turtle on them they did not have the money to pay everyone's first.. so they started defaulting.. and those folks that had the mortgages got VERY HOT VERY quick when they are getting default notices and have their credit trashed..

So I come in and slice and dice i think I saved maybe 15 of them  by taking them over and rectifying the situation .. And then worked hard to help them with sellers that were filing complaints at the AG's office.. etc.. they made it through but they got hammered..

there were others in our market that did the same thing and one even got jail time.

So its just a lot of risk if you are not properly capitalized..  Plus especially in Texas were they can get a default judgment on a owner occ loan.. doubly risky for the seller.

I hear you. There are always those stories, in any strategy. 

My opinion, it failed because they treated OF and L20, as rentals. Getting only 2k down, after putting 2k down, is foolish. These are buyers, not renters. I accept no less than 8% down, period. I always collect more than I put down, so if it does go bad and I have to foreclose, I am using their money to do it. The mindset is completely different with my buyer, then that of a renter. My buyer has considerably more money at stake, not just first and last months rent. Let's be honest, that strategy offers very little security to anyone. I always say that collecting security deposits, just reduces your losses by that amount, when it does go bad. 

If the motivation is wrong, or if you are under funded (sub 2, especially) or you look at REI with rose colored glasses, bad things are going to happen.

Post: Do you think this is a good deal?

John K.Posted
  • Wholesaler/Investor
  • Dallas, TX
  • Posts 260
  • Votes 222

@Denise James

You need to find out the actual ARV, not go off the tax assessment. This is not always reflective of the actual value of that home. It could be much more, a little more or even less.

Post: "Subject To" Real Estate Investing is Slimy. Prove me Wrong.

John K.Posted
  • Wholesaler/Investor
  • Dallas, TX
  • Posts 260
  • Votes 222

@Jay Hinrichs

For sure. 

Post: "Subject To" Real Estate Investing is Slimy. Prove me Wrong.

John K.Posted
  • Wholesaler/Investor
  • Dallas, TX
  • Posts 260
  • Votes 222
Originally posted by @Jay Hinrichs:
Originally posted by @Cody Zucker:

@James Wise

I understand why the discussion comes into play but when the term slimy is used regarding strategies like this or wholesaling it still baffles me that people are judged when using creative strategies when most investors talk about buying properties off market for .60 on the dollar I don’t see how this is worse.

There are always bad actors in any arena of business but labeling the strategy with this kind of taboo seems silly. As long as the buyer fulfills their end of the contract, what does it matter?

Motivation is motivation - and if someone is open to an offer that gets them what they want (out of a problem property) why is this an issue?

From my view point as someone who has done a lot of it and seen a lot of it over the years.. Its not that its slimmy.. its that is RISKY in a huge way to a seller who simply may not understand the repercusions if their sub too buyer defaults.  Thats the issue.. and of course as you state we are all out there trying to score real estate deals.. so most folks that would sit down with a civilian seller IE not sophisticated in the least are not going to point out all the RISK factors for them. they are just going to talk about the blue sky this is great for them factors.

Where these create trouble is

1. under capitalized investor thinking hey i can get into a proeprty with little down and no credit. Well what happens when this investor puts a tenant in there that stops paying.. and now they have to pay the mortgage and of course they never thought that far ahead and they simply dont have the means.. boom the original sellers mortgage goes into default. .and they could have had perfect credit and they are sunk.

2. Original seller stills has mortgage on their fico and cant get another loan becasue of it.. No one told them that part.

3. Nefarious folks do this in a predatory manner and really screw people get into title dont pay on the underlying and just rip the rents..

for quick turn around rescue resell retire the mortgage i get that..  but to couch this as some benefit to most sellers just BS. 

There are "those" people in every strategy known in real estate. It's impossible to get away from. Thieves will be thieves. 

As far as your 2nd point. The likelihood they would qualify for a new loan, after having late payments on a mortgage, is pretty slim. Even if they did, they are not going to have the 20% or more down, to even think of buying a new home. If they had that much cash, the would not be in this situation. But yes, they should be informed that it's not likely they would get a 2nd mortgage, regardless. 

Post: "Subject To" Real Estate Investing is Slimy. Prove me Wrong.

John K.Posted
  • Wholesaler/Investor
  • Dallas, TX
  • Posts 260
  • Votes 222

@James Wise

The 2 strategies that I use against LE deals, are as follows:

1. My system alerts me to any property, that I identify as being in the GO ZONE. This is what I refer to as a neighborhood that has an historical record of consistently strong appreciation, over a period of time. For me, it's 10 years. Let's say that number is 8%, per year. In a little over 12 years, I would be looking at doubling my money. Even if I wanted to capitalize it in 10 years, I would still be doing very well. Since landlords are more concerned with cash flow, they wouldn't be looking at LE deals, thus never see this opportunity. 

2. The most lucrative strategy, is to wrap this into an OF deal. My deals are 9.5% interest, if I secure a sub 2 at 4-6%, I'm doing pretty well. The beauty of this strategy, i have ZERO expenses, and my cash flow is considerably more than $100-200 per month.

As far as the DOS clause, I don't lose any sleep over it. I know banks are known for doing some pretty dumb things, but if they are foolish enough to call a performing 4-6% note due, only to risk having to resell it at 3%, there is not much that can be said about that.

Yes, there are those people that think they make more money by taking advantage of a sub 2 and letting it foreclose, they make a few grand. However, those that do this to actually make real money, actually do help the seller. Our payments are always on time and it's the seller's credit that gets the benefit. 

Post: "Subject To" Real Estate Investing is Slimy. Prove me Wrong.

John K.Posted
  • Wholesaler/Investor
  • Dallas, TX
  • Posts 260
  • Votes 222

@Jay Hinrichs

I have no doubt that there have been many investors that have failed at the low equity game, but I know several, that are killing it. Those that know how to do it, including myself, make substantially larger returns, than most rentals.  

I would be willing to bet that the number of failed LE investors, pale in comparison to the number of failed rental portfolio's. I don't track those numbers, but I wholesale/buy a lot of properties from rental portfolios, that are failing.