Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Joe P.

Joe P. has started 50 posts and replied 806 times.

Post: What Metric is your "Go-To" at-a-glance analysis for deals?

Joe P.Posted
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 824
  • Votes 1,098

I guess I look at all of the main ones -- 1% rule, ARV, projected cash flow, etc.

A deal is a deal when multiple projections prove profitable. I tell myself this all the time -- if it's a mediocre deal in a perfect world, and a horrid deal if things go south, then I leave it to some other investor who has a higher risk tolerance.

Ultimately, some folks do great with those -- maybe they do their own work, don't have a day job, manage themselves, and are rockstars at all of those things, allowing them to accumulate volume and properties. That's not me.

Ultimately, YOU have to decide what's within your goals and risk tolerance. One area I invest in within NJ, the 1% rule doesn't work...it has to be closer to 2% because of taxes and the age of the homes. But maybe in Philadelphia, investors are fine with 0.5 to 0.8%, and are banking on appreciation...none of us are wrong...some of us might be stupid, but not wrong.

Whatever you decide, you have to be comfortable and happy with. Information is key and the more information you can glean, even at a cursory level in your area, is going to make you smarter and you'll make better decisions.

Post: Tenant just moved in, and now needs to move out

Joe P.Posted
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 824
  • Votes 1,098
Originally posted by @John Liberati:

Joe depending on the laws of your state, You and I are in pa. You are from Philadelphia they have tenant-friendly laws, but you would go by the state law. I have them sign an agreement to hold units off the market for their deposit. If they sign a lease with us, per our state law we can consider it a breach of contract and they are responsible for the length of the lease or up to the time we find another tenant. If we locate another tenant, they would be responsible for the time it took to locate a new tenant, plus any expenses. 

I've owned Multi-family complexes for over 30 years, since 1996 and if this happens we don't give back the deposit and rent unless we can locate some else and deduct all expenses and time. 

It's a business and you need to treat it as one. If they sign a contract with you and you turned away others from renting this unit. You are losing time and money, your time is also worth something. 

Good luck

John Liberati, President

Liberati Capital Group

Hi John - you're the second person I now know who lives in Macungie. :)

Appreciate all of those things -- this unit is actually in NJ. 

Post: Tenant just moved in, and now needs to move out

Joe P.Posted
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 824
  • Votes 1,098

Hi all - thanks for your advice. I've had nothing but pleasant interactions with this young lady, and opted to keep pro-rated rent. She signed a mutual agreement to terminate the lease, and I returned all other rents/deposits. She hadn't moved anything in yet and didn't do anything with the unit. I also charged her for a re-key, which I think is prudent either way.

Part of me wanted to keep her rent until finding someone else or for the month, but this property is a BRRRR and is probably the nicest house on the block after the rehab. I had 30 applicants walkthrough and 20-something applications. I think I'll find someone pretty quickly from that original pool, or someone new.

Yes, this costs me a first months rent in effect. A month I needed...because the previous month had construction delays which prevented me from getting someone in sooner. Probably a financial mistake on my part...but I selected this young lady for tenancy because I had a gut feeling she would be a great tenant, and still could be when she returns to the area.

Post: Tenant just moved in, and now needs to move out

Joe P.Posted
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 824
  • Votes 1,098

I swear this type of stuff might only happen to me. After a lengthy screening process on my BRRRR, I signed a lease with my tenant on November 1. Everything is good, received deposit and first month's rent. Just received a message from them today that they cannot move-in and need to move to another state due to a family member getting suddenly ill.

My radar is up (it's always up) but I want to understand the right process here. I'm thinking as long as they haven't damaged anything, I can do a deposit return/key return with them. They paid for a months rent, which I believe I should hold onto unless I can move someone in ahead of time, and then do partial rent up to that point.

Any thoughts/suggestions on proceeding? Anything I am missing? Anything I should do/shouldn't do?

Post: Would I benefit from getting my Real Estate License?

Joe P.Posted
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 824
  • Votes 1,098
Originally posted by @David M.:

@Joe P.

I like to think I understand the point of your question, but I'm stumbling over the mechanics:  "...share the proceeds with you."  I'm not sure how to legally do that, so your question is moot.

Meanwhile, asking a commission-based person to reduce their commission (it would have to be on a listing) doesn't truly make sense.  Most people thinks it make sense because they are trying to equate it to a salary/wage based employment.

If you are doing that many deals, I would like ot think the Realtor is part of your team providing value in ways other than just submitting an offer or listing a property (which there is more work than just that anyway).

Also, what sort of deals are you doing?  If you are just buying distressed properties (as you stated), there is actually more work for the Realtor for very little compensation since the price points are low....  I've had "clients" who wanted me to help them purchase really distressed properties (so lots more research and wanting me to check things for examle) for $50k to $100k that they told me later they would sell themselves for $300k or $400k plus.  So...  why am I even busting my *** for a "few hundred dollars" and they won't even give me the list side?  Now, you are suggesting I somehow give him a discount?  In this example, the two deals I would be averaging $200k a deal...  In NJ that's low...

So, I get what you are saying, but agents aren't compensated by the hour.  They can, not always, provide value.  For investment deals they don't necessarily get compensated much because of the price points.  And, I'm not sure how you were thinking of doing a volume reduction in fees legally.

Does that make sense?

Absolutely does, and the point was to illicit your thoughts from the other side of the coin. I've thought about OP's idea to get my license, and I've thought about working with my realtor to reduce commissions to help sweeten the deal (although haven't asked, just a means of "ramping up" and making the investor's numbers work) and so your opinion is helpful.

My thinking is If I use the agent for low purchase and commit to using them again for a (hopefully) high sell...but I am buy-and-hold strictly at the moment, so my poor agent is only getting the low purchase. :(

Post: Would I benefit from getting my Real Estate License?

Joe P.Posted
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 824
  • Votes 1,098
Originally posted by @David M.:

@Joe P.

How are you suggesting this "investor friendly agent" share the proceeds with you?  Thats sort of the whole point of licensure and the fact that brokering of real estate is regulated in every State (as I believe as every State has licensed Agents I thought).

I wrote another post about the benefits of a Realtor/real estate agent on your side.  Many BP members and investors just see them as money grubbing sales people making tons of money via commission (as you can see above, they don't necessarily).  Also, agents seem to be compared with salary-type positions vs. any other sales/commissioned-based positions.  You might want to find and think of them as one of your "team members" which is talked about so much.

For me personally, I can do flips and handle my own investments since I quit my day job recently.  Previously, when I was working 100+ week for my day job, my agent handled lots of things for me.  It was just part of the service...  In the end, she was well compensated for it.  She has gotten dozens of sales of my tenants, and she got all my transactions.  So, to spend some time here and there running around or making phone calls for me as basically a property manager was a huge payoff, much more than any property manager would have made (I didn't run the numbers, but you get the idea).

Anyway, what was your point?

The point was determining if you should get your license versus working with an investor-friendly agent who would share proceeds with you on a deal. Certainly I wouldn't expect it, but wondering if volume from a single person buying multiple MLS properties in the course of the year would allow someone to recoup some of that money (sweetening the deal for the investor), especially if the investor is taking their time to find the properties first.

Certainly not an argument that it should happen, was just asking a hypothetical question in the thread. I'm a consultant for my day job, and if I have a client who is committing or consistently proving to put multiple contracts in front of me, I would certainly consider a "volume discount" for that client, especially if they asked.

Post: Would I benefit from getting my Real Estate License?

Joe P.Posted
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 824
  • Votes 1,098
Originally posted by @David M.:

@Dennis Soto

https://www.biggerpockets.com/...

In the above I wrote a bunch on this topic.  There were a few other recently, but I can't get my hands on it quickly.

So, don't forget that you have a split with your broker (or really, the broker is splitting the commission with you since all deals are broker to broker, and agents work for brokers).

As I wrote, your yearly fees and dues are anywhere from $2k to $4k depending on a bunch of factors.

You need to find a broker that is willing to take you on knowing, or will find out, that you are really just wanting to represent yourself.  Thus, your production will be minimal, at best, thus potentially actually costing him/her money.

There is the usual concept is how well can you really represent yourself as a real estate agent?  Its is a profession, and if you never really spend time learning the trade...  I know many investors who don't have a license, find their deals off-market (really where the deals are to be found) and just hand it off to a Realtor to sell when they are done.  They don't spend time dealing with it, and focus their time on what they know best.  That being said, yes, I personally am an "investor with a real estate license" but I do also work full time as an agent representing "regular" and investor clients...

Yes, you could save some listing fees (not so much the cooperating fee) for your flips by representing yourself.  You maybe you are saving 1%..  Obviously, it adds up but don't think you are saving the 5%-6% listing commission.

I know its a bunch of info.  If you want to chat about (two way dialogue is always so much easier), send me a direct message and I'd be happy to chat.

@David, wouldn't it make *more* sense for an investor to try and find an investor-friendly agent, someone who might be willing to share some of THEIR proceeds with you, especially if you find the deal yourself?

For example, the property I just BRRRR'd, I went on MLS to find distressed properties that had stale listings, found this one, asked to tour with my realtor, told her to make the offer, etc. Now she did most of the work on the realtor side, but I'm wondering how appropriate (or not appropriate) it would be, in that type of situation and perhaps ongoing, if I'm finding those properties and making those deals, should I ask for some of the proceeds back to help with the numbers? I think its kind of disrespectful to ask, so I am curious to know a realtor's perspective in that situation.

Post: Would I benefit from getting my Real Estate License?

Joe P.Posted
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 824
  • Votes 1,098

I believe you need to be sponsored by a broker, meaning you need to work for an agency or strike out on your own as a broker in addition to the license itself.

I'm sure you're not the first person to think of this idea, I've thought about it on my own, so there must be a brokering agency that has investor-agents on their staff and maybe take some nominal fees while you do all of the work.

Following the thread to see if any investor-agents know. I wonder if I could bother @Tara S. since I know she's a NJ agent and might also do some work on her own..

Post: Starting while working 60 hour weeks

Joe P.Posted
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 824
  • Votes 1,098

Is your job flipping/rehabbing, @Ryan Guffey? (Thats what you listed as your job on the boards...)

If so, could you sub out some of those hours your spending? Could you take half of your business once you clear your projects out and dedicate it to personal projects?

Post: First official investment property on the books!

Joe P.Posted
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 824
  • Votes 1,098
Originally posted by @Greg Koszkul:
Originally posted by @Joe P.:

Congrats @Zach Gring. One thing I'll tell you is unless you're going through the property with a fine tooth comb, be prepared for a good six months of issues popping up. Make sure your reserves are high enough to handle whatever your tenants find and need fixing/replacement. Within the first year on my duplex, I replaced one water heater, fixed a backed up sewage line, fixed the same pipe when it literally fell to the ground during a massive rain storm, pumped the basement out 3 times, added a new checkvalve, bought new fridge and new oven, and had to have the heater serviced twice. And that is just the first few months.

Point is...these can be either items of operation, or items of pain. If you know (and are honest with yourself, as well not being so hard on yourself), you can quickly act to get someone in to solve these issues quickly.  And then its fixed.

I'd recommend having 5k-10k in reserves just for the first few months and your first year to be relatively break-even, if not costing you a few bucks. That's OK - you're stabilizing the property, which makes Y2 so much better.

Good luck!

 Hi Joe! What would be a good system to have in place (due diligence) when inspecting the property to weed out houses that may end up costing tens of thousands in maintenance and repairs in the first few months of ownership? It seems that sometimes the numbers make sense for what you are purchasing it for but once it is in your hands it slowly starts to become apparent that there are more and more issues that show up.

Honestly? Experience and knowledge are probably the only substitutes, and either being able to comb through yourself or with someone that can do that is the only way. There's a book by J. Scott that I purchased that does a great job of helping to level set you if you aren't sure.