Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Yang Lu

Yang Lu has started 4 posts and replied 36 times.

Post: Tenant asking for reimbursement due to a bad HVAC repair

Yang LuPosted
  • Investor
  • San Jose, CA
  • Posts 36
  • Votes 19

We got a note from one of our tenants requesting reimbursement for an HVAC repair that was done improperly, supposedly causing electricity over-usage. How do you recommend we respond to something like this? Thank you.

Post: Agent Commission Deal when Flipping

Yang LuPosted
  • Investor
  • San Jose, CA
  • Posts 36
  • Votes 19

Thanks for the information here!

Follow up question:

Is there a formal process for this? e.g. is there a form or something that documents the whole agreement so that the investor does not ultimately flake and use another agent as the listing agent for the renovated property?

What is the default/most secure way to lock in such a deal? 

Let's say I found a great deal, showed it to Investor John. John says "you give back X amount to the seller, or take a flat fee for the purchase, and I'll have you as the listing agent at standard rate."

Is there such a document that legalizes that agreement?

Post: Fence & Boundary Dispute - San Jose SFH (Blossom Hill)

Yang LuPosted
  • Investor
  • San Jose, CA
  • Posts 36
  • Votes 19
Quote from @Bill B.:

You’re going to need an attorney. After a certain number of years this fence can legally become the new property line. It happens all the time on farm land in MN. My BIL went through this a few years ago. A rock pile (rocks picked from the fields) was treated as the boundary for more than 30 years he owned the land. His neighbor got a survey and it showed the rock pile was 30 feet on the neighbors side. This is over a full mile of land. 

My BIL offers to reimburse him for the value of the land but they wanted the land. It went to court and basically the rock piles had become the de facto property line. He still tried to pay the neighbor but he hasn’t cashed the check and they aren’t speaking 3 years later. 


 The attorneys said that adverse possession/prescriptive easements are very hard to pull off here, in this subdivided lots. They're a lot more prevalent in areas like the ones you referred to. 

The prescriptive easements, if they use a fence to block off OUR usage of that land, it's no longer a prescriptive easement. 

Post: Fence & Boundary Dispute - San Jose SFH (Blossom Hill)

Yang LuPosted
  • Investor
  • San Jose, CA
  • Posts 36
  • Votes 19
Quote from @Joel Forsythe:

Nobody wants or needs negative neighbor issues, but you made significant efforts to be amenable. I agree with others, it’s your property, you do what you need to. If you indeed did civil survey, and at least consulted the city and an attorney, your due diligence should be enough to move forward, shift any legal instigation to (her?) side. It sounds like if she seeks representation, she’ll be advised to pay for her own survey and likely be shown what is and isn’t her property, and that she’ll have little leverage to make legal fees worth it. (I’m no attorney, and you’d have to ask one about your state’s view on Abandonment based pre-existing fence incorrectly set, but I’d say that’s gotta be weak sauce)

I’d do the certified letter as advised above, leaving a list of all the efforts made to address the matter in good faith, with dates, and the neighbor’s response to those efforts. Then pull permits for new fence (if required), demo the old one, have surveyor stake or spike the property line, and like Bruce said, finish side at least a couple inches on your property.

She’ll have to engage and pay for an attorney to get you to stop, but that seems unlikely if your survey is correct and not in error. If she engages the city, and you have a certified site plan, staked property line, and permits, then they aren’t getting involved. Does she seem like someone with disposable legal bill income? Does moving the fence over radically inhibit her preexisting use (clearances etc) on her side? Added burden ingress/egress issues?

Good luck.




 Great points, thanks Joel.

She is a semi retired lady, and likely will not want to spend exorbitant amounts of $ for this, but she also seems like the kind that is irrational (i.e. her anger may cause her to pursue litigation, even though it makes no sense). I think that isn't too big of an issue. Moving the fence does not radically change her preexisting use. She is just enjoying a wider side alley.  

I posted a photo of the situation in the response above. I wonder if you have an idea what we would do about that side door of hers, which currently encroaches 1.5ft on the left side through the boundary line.

Post: Fence & Boundary Dispute - San Jose SFH (Blossom Hill)

Yang LuPosted
  • Investor
  • San Jose, CA
  • Posts 36
  • Votes 19
Quote from @Chris Seveney:

@Yang Lu

Just get an attorney to send certified letter noting the concrete is on your property and you will be removing it (if that’s what you want to do or keep it and add to it) on X date.

Prior to removal we will snap a chalk line for the area to be removed but please be advised the removal of concrete may cause damage to the concrete on your property which we cannot be held responsible for.

That way you show where everything is being removed - also check your county bylaws and or HOA as typically you cannot install any permanent structure like concrete within 1' of a property line.

I wouldn’t even bring up the fence just remove it. It’s on your property and you have the survey

The day you start removing it you will know the outcome if they fight or not until that date you are stressing over it and stop stressing just do it.

 Thanks for the suggestion! We will likely pursue this route. 

So the set up looks like this. The orange fence is our side, and the gray fence is her side. If we demo the concrete, up to the property line, what happens to that door she has there that leads to the side alley? A part of that door will stick over the property line. 

Post: Fence & Boundary Dispute - San Jose SFH (Blossom Hill)

Yang LuPosted
  • Investor
  • San Jose, CA
  • Posts 36
  • Votes 19
Quote from @Chris Seveney:

@Yang Lu

If you have a licensed survey get an attorney to send them a letter to remove the fence - if it’s not removed by x date you will remove it yourself

I had a co-worker go through this and they ended up just removing it.

By the way how do you know they even put up the fence? Did you check with permit office who installed the fence?

Who knows it could have been people who owned your home.


 It is possible that the previous owner built this fence. But he has passed away, so I cannot verify. Does it matter who built it? I think I have the right to tear down the fence, and even cut the concrete that the neighbors poured up to the fence on their side, since all of that is on our land. 

I wish it was as simple as remove the old fence, and build a new fence 1.5ft out. There is concrete on that side that we would have to cut off too in order to build a new fence. The neighbor might blow up if we just decided to tear down the fence and cut the concrete on that side, even though 1.5ft of it is on our side of the boundary line.

Post: Fence & Boundary Dispute - San Jose SFH (Blossom Hill)

Yang LuPosted
  • Investor
  • San Jose, CA
  • Posts 36
  • Votes 19
Quote from @Matthew Paul:

So , there is a fence on the property YOU own . And that fence is 1 1/2 feet inside YOUR property . It MUST be your fence then .  Looks like your neighbor may have attached to your fence . 


 That may have been the case. Some neighbors in this cul-de-sac said back then the owner (when he was alive) built this fence with the help of some people from his church. Not sure what he used as measurement when he put the fence in (whether it was a previous fence, or he just decided to put it somewhere he felt was right?). And then after that, possible that the neighbor poured concrete up to the fence on their side. So now, if we remove the fence, there is still concrete on that side of the fence that is technically "our land."

Post: Fence & Boundary Dispute - San Jose SFH (Blossom Hill)

Yang LuPosted
  • Investor
  • San Jose, CA
  • Posts 36
  • Votes 19
Quote from @Theresa Harris:

Ask the county what the next step is if she won't go to mediation. Just because she doesn't want to move the fence, doesn't mean she won't have to.  It may mean going to court in which case you can also try to get her to pay for legal fees as part of any settlement since she refused mediation.  The county may also just tell her if she doesn't want to mediate, that they will make the decision.


 Hello Theresa, I tried talking to the county but they say they cannot get involved in this matter, which boggles my mind...

If we pursue the legal route, it's going to get costly, and we would likely ask for legal compensation, but I'm not sure if that is possible.

Post: Fence & Boundary Dispute - San Jose SFH (Blossom Hill)

Yang LuPosted
  • Investor
  • San Jose, CA
  • Posts 36
  • Votes 19

Hello friends,

My wife and I bought a house here in Blossom Hill, and it was a trust sale as the previous owner passed away. 

Recently we decided to build an ADU, so we did a land survey. The results of the land survey show that the side fence between our neighbor and our house was built 1.5ft into our side, leading to a 3.5ft width of our side walk alley and a 6.5ft side walk alley on her side. This fence has been built for many years, it seems like. The 3.5ft width on our side probably will pose issues going forward. Also, since we discovered this, some people told us we have 3 years to fight for the land back, or there is some kind of statute of limitations after that, in which we will lose the land...

We showed her the survey result and we offered to pay for a new fence altogether (the old fence is falling apart as well), but she refused to agree, and said she is not interested in dealing with us. We talked to the Santa Clara County mediation office, who called her about mediation, but she said she does not want to do mediation. She is not accepting our calls, or answering us when we ring the doorbell.


At this point, we're not sure what to do. Can anyone provide some guidance?

Thank you!

Yang

Post: What are my options as a first time home buyer in the Bay Area?

Yang LuPosted
  • Investor
  • San Jose, CA
  • Posts 36
  • Votes 19

Kevin, love that you're thinking about this, and considering house hacking.

I bought a 4bed2bath in san jose 2 years ago, and have successfully house hacked for the entire time, paying essentially nothing to live there.

I think a 3/4 bed in the ~1M range would be very good for your situation. If you want to chat more, feel free to message me directly! I can walk you through the pros and cons.