Originally posted by @Jarrod Kohl:
Thanks Jarrod! Yes I agree that Boston was already well positioned as a Silicon Valley of the East (along with NY and Washington DC), but what I'm trying to figure out is what is "already in the price" and the marginal future growth. Some posters in the past had pointed to financial services as a future growth engine for Boston and this I am not so sure about, unless they mean low cost fin tech and insurance company disruption / innovation. Then I have my big worries on biotech which I outlined in a (overly) long prior post. Yes it's awesome that companies like Moderna may save the world but I think there is a regulatory shadow coming on any kind of expensive medical product or service in the coming years, whichever party is in power. See that it was Trump who put the eviction ban on until the end of the year perhaps surprising some older style Country Club type GOP folks--he and Republicans have also mentioned more price caps on pharma. When both parties agree on something it's more likely to happen, and nothing much even happens these days in Congress.
I think the anti science, anti elite, populist wave that is all over the US, could really be a risk factor for all pharma. I could certainly be wrong but I am not sure I want to spend >$1m+ on a 3 family property in the Boston area that is plugged into the pharma theme. Hence why I'm looking out for sources of growth in Boston that are not old style finance and not pharma/biotech. There are a bunch of stories about tech expansion in the Seaport, as opposed to Kendall Sq only, that may throw up some interesting opportunities in for example Savin Hill. It's already expensive but I imagine it's cheaper than Cambridge/Somerville and one could cycle/scooter to the Seaport. Maybe they will even develop a small ferry.
So to sum up I am not bearish on Boston, I just have lingering fears about reliance on biotech for future growth