I am all for this type of investing. There are a few positive points to the side of class c sfr that are being left out right now
1 ease of entry. The first house I bought, after my initial crash and burn, was bought cash for 6500. I had just cleared bankruptcy, that took like 2 years due to some seller financing, had no credit, was scared of debt. I bought it, lived in it, a year and about 15,000 total in, I had a house in good repair. The plumbing furnace , kitchen, and bath were all new. I did all repairs myself except install the carpet. I have had good and bad tenants in there, i think right now, i have a solid long term tenant.
2 learning how to skills. As said I did all the repairs myself. This is in 2006. Before I knew how to search the internet. Some stuff went well, some not so much. Another plus is when you're in a lower rent area, people don't get upset if the grout lines aren't perfect. They aren't going to pass because it has no dishwasher or garbage disposal. If I have no dishwasher, what are my future repairs on it?
3 low negative cashflow. I have no mortgage, my taxes and insurance are low. When I have a tenant not pay, or move out my immediate cashflow goes slightly negative. If I had a mortgage on it, the payment would be due while I was turning the unit.
4 more stability of cashflow through averaging out. In my area, i can be all in 25,000 and pull $600 a month. I can do this consistently, doing the gc duties, but farming out the labor. I have been at it a while and have a decent circle of people. But the point is for $125,000 I have a $3000 rent roll,from 6 people. I usually run better than 90% collection of rents but i rarely take less than full rent so let's say 1 doesn't pay, i have $2400 received. I zillowed my personal house, it's zestimate is 163,000 as an investor, you could get it for say 130,000 and it's rent is 1200.
5 less picky tenants. Like I said, when I started, doing it on my own I did some work that wasn't perfect. Not bad or unsafe, but not perfect. My houses are the equivalent of a 1992 Honda 5 speed with crank Windows. Not a lot of bells and whistles, but inexpensive and mostly reliable, if it breaks not hard to fix, parts are cheap.
6 pull cash out. If i were leveraged in a house, 80% and i NEED CASH! I can't really get it, not an easy refi, hard to fsbo so an agent eats up your equity. I can use mine as collateral to a hml, or sell to an investor for cash. Yes It will suck, but I said need cash.
7 longer term tenants. I may be completely off base here, but since we are ingrained from birth in America the American dream is to own a home. If I have a solid fico and income, i can't see me staying as long as someone without those things. I may be completely wrong here, I'm sure there are exceptions to that rule even if I'm correct
8 better people. I again, may be way off base, but from personal experience, find that the biggest jerks would be in high end rentals. When I have delt with people that were actually wealthy, they were great. They didn't care in a good way, no beating up on price, polite, friendly. The wannabes, not so much. They needed to squeeze every penny out of everything so they could live that image. That's who I picture renting a $150,000 house here. My tenants are, as a general rule good people, they work, pay the bills they just make less.
There are definitely downsides to this investment style, they have been laid out all over the site. I won't buy a property I wouldn't live in when complete. The neighborhoods that i invest in, i consider safe with poor schools, and an income tax. If not for that, i would live there. Sorry so long, just my thoughts