Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Jaekwan Lee

Jaekwan Lee has started 6 posts and replied 23 times.

Post: Do I need to make sure that a deal is under 1% & 50% rules?

Jaekwan Lee
Posted
  • Posts 23
  • Votes 4
Quote from @Michael Smythe:

@Jaekwan Lee what price do you have to offer so rent covers your mortgage, property taxes, insurance and other expenses?

I think that's my problem. I am not sure what price is good to go as a first time buyer and house hacker. The most tricky part is realistic other expenses. If I make the other exponses too conservative, no deals are good enough to purchase whereas not being conservative makes me scare as I don't know what the realities are.

How do I get the expense most realistic? The below was something I was using but not sure if this is conversative or not.

- Maintenance & Repair: 5% of total rent
- Cap ex / utilities: 5% of total rent
- Property management: 8~10% of total rent
- Misc & reserve: 5% of total rent

Full rent: 4800(rent) - 2600(PI) - 800(TI) - 1150(Expense) = $250/m
Owner occupied: 3600(rent) - 2600(PI) - 800(TI) - 1150(Expense) = -$950/m
Owner occupied & no PM: 3600(rent) - 2600(PI) - 800(TI) - 700(Expense) = -$400/m


I thought it would be $0/m if owner occupied although $400/m for myfamily is low enough.

To cover entire expense, the only thing that can be reduced is PI and should be $2200(PI) and if I do reverse calculate, the house price should be $410k. This seems unrealistic.

Post: Do I need to make sure that a deal is under 1% & 50% rules?

Jaekwan Lee
Posted
  • Posts 23
  • Votes 4
Quote from @Sarita Scherpereel:

Dave Meyer- from bigger pockets wrote and interesting blog a few years ago about the 1% rule being deal. https://www.biggerpockets.com/blog/1-percent-rule-dead

It's pretty fascinating. Such a reminder that these rules are not the standard for investing. As @theresaharris mentioned these are just guidelines. I'm from Sugar Land but now live in Chicago. I'd say if you find inventory to buy in Houston that is close to these guidelines, I'd go for it. Houston isn't making 4 unit buildings regularly. It should appreciate...depending on your area. Definitely ask your realtor about appreciation in the area you're looking to purchase. 

 Best of luck! 


 Thanks @Sarita. I do remember the posting as you mentioned in my another thread. By reading the article makes sense also I can understand the motivation of the article as it was in 2021 when things were crazy. It is good to remind other benefits of having a property. Do you think still 1% doesn't work in many places as we are in 2024? 

Post: Do I need to make sure that a deal is under 1% & 50% rules?

Jaekwan Lee
Posted
  • Posts 23
  • Votes 4
Quote from @Theresa Harris:

Don't worry about 'rules' as they are guidelines some people use to get a quick idea if the property works.  You need to look at the expenses (mortgage, insurance, property taxes, etc) and income.  If you are living in one of the four units, run the numbers as if you were renting all 4 units.  Ideally the rent from the other three units will cover most of your living expenses (ie 'rent') for your own unit while you are living there. If you are planning on buying it with a smaller down payment, that will also increase your mortgage costs as you are borrowing more and also need mortgage insurance.

The price of the home (from the seller's perspective) is based on market value and condition, not on whether or not it matches the 1% rule.   Talk to your realtor about what a realistic price is for the home.

Thanks for the reply. 


I think the main problem is to figure out if the property works as a first time house hacker/ investor. I ran number multiple times but my estimation seems not great as I am not sure what percentage I should allocate monthly expenses as the recommandation is a range such as 5%~15%. With my number, the property gives cashflow of $200-300 without me occupying there. If we stay, we are staying in with $500-$800/m which is cheaper than other renters but not so great as I was expecting living 'free' or $100-$200/m. However, I am also aware if the interest rate gets a little down to 5%-6%, the number should have been better than this.   

Post: Do I need to make sure that a deal is under 1% & 50% rules?

Jaekwan Lee
Posted
  • Posts 23
  • Votes 4

Hi folks, I am trying to buy a quadplex to house hack for my family. We are planning to occupy there for 1 ~ 2 years and looking for cash flow after we leave. So my plan is to get experience on managing property & maintaining tenants. And right now, I am looking at a deal that looks promising but number isn't that great but also not that bad. But it seems the deals is a little out of 1% & 50% rule. Here is the exact number. 

Property ask price: $486k but rent income is $4800($1200/unit). My mortgage will be $2600+(7.3% rate) so expenses can be $2200 at max as 45%. These numbers are not a house hacking scenario but to check if the deal is good so that I can start house hacking. In short, the deal has < 1% rule for rent to asking price and 50% can't be spent as expenses. I also feel this looks not great because of 7.3% interest rate but also I made it so conservative since I didn't take vacancy rate into account. 


- I am aware that possibly I need to negotiate the asking to 480k to match 1% rule but also not sure if that's convincing enough.  

Post: Duplex that does not cashflows still good for first home?

Jaekwan Lee
Posted
  • Posts 23
  • Votes 4
Quote from @Russell Brazil:
Quote from @Jaekwan Lee:
Quote from @Russell Brazil:

Is your other option to live in a house and not househack that will cost you $4,000 a month?


I could go a single home that could cost me $2500-$3000 a month. 


 So let's look at the options.

Option A: Pay Rent $3,000 a month. You help your landlord grow rich. 

Option B: Buy Duplex. Cost $4,000 a month. Tenant pays $2,000 of that, and you pay $2,000. 

Option B allows you to save an extra $12,000 s month (minus maintenance costs) and build equity. Rents will continue to rise over time as well. Your tenant helps you grow rich instead of you helping your landlord grow rich.

Option B seems like a no brainer to me.


 I meant Option A would be buying a single home with $2500-$3000 mortgage payment and possibly use 'live and fix' to increase the house value. 

Post: Use FHA or conventional if you just started investment but you have enough downpaymen

Jaekwan Lee
Posted
  • Posts 23
  • Votes 4
Quote from @Crystal Smith:
Quote from @Jaekwan Lee:

Hi, I just start getting to know investment after reading a house hacking book and I really want to begin the journey of expanding rental real estate. I am married and my family size is three (me, my wife, and 3 yrs daughter). Since I need to think about sending my daughter school in a couple of years, I want to start with duplex. I have enough savings for down payment 20% but I also hear that you have one chance of using FHA loan. So here is my confusion. Is still better to get FHA loan with 3.5% when I have 20% down payment for the duplex? Since I feel I see two options I can think of.

- Buy duplex with FHA 3.5% and look for another property like fourplex

- Buy duplex with conventional loan 20% down and wait until gain another downpayment 


Because I don't know the price points in your market along with what you can get for rent it's impossible to answer the question about whether or not it makes sense to buy with 3.5% down or 20% down and still positively cash flow a duplex.   I recommend you do some market research on the price points to purchase and what you can get for rent to answer the question yourself.

Regarding a 3 to 4 unit, If you decide to use an FHA loan make sure you research the FHA self-sufficiency guidelines.

@Crystal Smith Thanks. It is good to know FHA self-sufficiency guidelines.

Post: Use FHA or conventional if you just started investment but you have enough downpaymen

Jaekwan Lee
Posted
  • Posts 23
  • Votes 4
Quote from @Andrew Freed:

@Jaekwan Lee - Happy to help. Not particularly. I was saying utilize a 5% down conventional first if possible and find a househack that is at least a 3 to 4 unit property since duplexes don't cash flow once you leave. If duplexes are your only option, I would recommend house hacking that and investing out of state to find more multifamily. Or you can invest in San Antonio and househack there. I know there are more multifamily in that market than Austin TX. 


You are right. I see the number works better in San Antonio than Austin. It is kind of difficult to decide since I need to move with my spouse and 3 yrs old daughter.

Post: Duplex that does not cashflows still good for first home?

Jaekwan Lee
Posted
  • Posts 23
  • Votes 4
Quote from @Dale Line:

It absolutely can be. House Hacking is generally the one situation when purchasing an investment property can be done without positive cash flow. The rationale being you are reducing your personal housing costs as the rented unit will be covering some of the costs. 

I did it with my first home purchase on a 2-family. Ended up living in my unit for about 25% of the price I was getting in market rent for the other unit, even though it didn't have positive cash flow.

Couple things to consider:

1. Make sure you are, in fact, spending less on a monthly basis than if you were buying/renting an equivalent personal property. It may not make sense for your personal finances if over invest and end up with a house hack option that costs more money than somewhere you could live on your own.

2. Run some estimates now on potential future earnings if, at some point, you didn't live in the house and instead it was used as 100% rental. It should have positive cash flow in that future scenario. 
 

Your case made sense because it is just 25% of the price for your unit. The properties I see the price near my area is around or above 100% of unit price (half the mortgage + @) so I don't see a reason to start with duplex. 

Post: Duplex that does not cashflows still good for first home?

Jaekwan Lee
Posted
  • Posts 23
  • Votes 4
Quote from @Russell Brazil:

Is your other option to live in a house and not househack that will cost you $4,000 a month?


I could go a single home that could cost me $2500-$3000 a month. 

Post: Duplex that does not cashflows still good for first home?

Jaekwan Lee
Posted
  • Posts 23
  • Votes 4
Quote from @Sarita Scherpereel:

Hi @Jaekwan it can. Especially, in some areas of the country were appreciation is high. The 1% rule isn't law and came into existence after the housing crisis but now is harder to find- https://www.biggerpockets.com/blog/1-percent-rule-dead

Attend local meetups to find out what the market is doing on a local level. That will help break down that market and give direct insight on deals there. Best of luck! 


Thanks. This would explain why it is hard to find a property under 1% rule.